Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei must go gaolang > your fav is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
A bad employee is an employee that hurt the compagny more than it helps it. In a capitalist society, its simply not viable to keep them. So either you want your compagny to fail, or there are no bad employee in your compagny. Just less productive than others.
But even then, noone is inherently a bad employee. You actually don't know about people's life and the reasons why sometimes they put more effort in their own life rather than their work. Sometimes there are very good reason for it.
Again. Maybe you should look again at the way you see you employee. Maybe, say something nice to someone you think is bad.. that might make their day just a little bit better and give them the incentive to be even more productive for you.
A compliment cost you nothing. But it can change the day of someone that don't see any future.
They just requoted correctly the message.
But even then, noone is inherently a bad employee. You actually don't know about people's life and the reasons why sometimes they put more effort in their own life rather than their work. Sometimes there are very good reason for it.
Again. Maybe you should look again at the way you see you employee. Maybe, say something nice to someone you think is bad.. that might make their day just a little bit better and give them the incentive to be even more productive for you.
A compliment cost you nothing. But it can change the day of someone that don't see any future.
They just requoted correctly the message.
Here is a prime example of someone who knows nothing they talk about. There is a reason our good employees stay. Some of them have worked for my father for over thirty years. This line of thinking of yours is delusional when you are not involved in the system.
Companies want the best productivity, so they get more value. That is why those of value get paid more, promotions and are kept around longer, while the others stay in a turnover cycle without any forward projection in their careers.
Companies want the best productivity, so they get more value. That is why those of value get paid more, promotions and are kept around longer, while the others stay in a turnover cycle without any forward projection in their careers.
I like showing off my accomplishments and others should be proud of theirs as well. But, trophies aren't the only reward system. Rewards come in pay raises, extra perks. Even credit cards and the like offer reward insensitives. It can be stretched even farther, to earning good grades and getting offers others do not for that. It's a system that helps push people to achieve more or in credit cards spend more lol.
I used trophies as symbolism to umbrella all rewards.
I used trophies as symbolism to umbrella all rewards.
Yeah... Giving a compliment to a worker... Straight communism lol
I know some people here who might actually think that unironically.
Sure...
Me thinking that no human being is inherently bad at working is delusional ? Hm.. sure ..
Wanting productivity is fine as long as it stays ethical for the workers.
"Those of value" Are you reading what you are typing here ?
That meritocratic cynicism...
What a despicable vision of workers. I'm actually low key disgusted here. Not even kidding (and it takes a lot for me to be disgusted on this forum)
I know some people here who might actually think that unironically.
Sure...
Me thinking that no human being is inherently bad at working is delusional ? Hm.. sure ..
Wanting productivity is fine as long as it stays ethical for the workers.
"Those of value" Are you reading what you are typing here ?
That meritocratic cynicism...
What a despicable vision of workers. I'm actually low key disgusted here. Not even kidding (and it takes a lot for me to be disgusted on this forum)
H
The far from Capitalism the closer to communism even if you aim to stay between. There is nothing besides that.
Soviet Union.
You are hurting me with your ideas. Stop talking.
My problem with it is how random it actually would be.
Well I don't know French people so can't tell. I've also heard that Chinese are also very political.
This doesn't work even inside the house with your own family. Imagine in a country.
Like I said minimum wage is meant to create unemployment. I forgot to add that also illegal or informal work too. Not everyone even completes high school. Even less college. Some people can't produce enough to be paid minimum wage therefore you won't get hired. This is specially prejudicial to Youngs trying to join the market and get their first job since you can see that most ads of hiring requires experience.
And dude for God Sakes France has similar level as Brazil in unemployment. That's very high. You really want to destroy the country and see people miserable in poverty. All you care is about the few ones that will remain with the increased minimum wage while a lot more join the unemployment.
Here in Brazil we had the political promise of nursery area to be raid their minimum wage. There are 2 "famous" nurses that made a video saying thanks to Bolsonaro for passing the bill but then saying they would vote for Lula because the two things were unrelated. And the end Lula got elected and removed the raise of their minimum wage. They got mad, protested but ended up without it which is a good thing but not before the employees got fired previously because they knew they wouldn't be able to afford the new wage. So like I said people got unemployment because of it.
In the United States, the late 19th-century ideas for favoring a minimum wage also coincided with the eugenics movement. As a consequence, some economists at the time, including Royal Meeker and Henry Rogers Seager, argued for the adoption of a minimum wage not only to support the worker, but to support their desired semi- and skilled laborers while forcing the undesired workers (including the idle, immigrants, women, racial minorities, and the disabled) out of the labor market. The result, over the longer term, would be to limit the nondesired workers' ability to earn money and have families, and thereby, remove them from the economists' ideal society.[20]
Wtf? Then what will do the raise if production remains the same? You really knows nothing about economics.
What is bullshit? I'm not denting that. I'm saying that an employee that is more skilled is more valuable asset than others. And if there is a need to cut someone out than the less profitable will go.
Meritocracy does exists. It is not simple as just being skilled. I used just for example to be understood. Your skills has to be useful and today world (better start learning how to improve your work with AI you hater) and you need to learn how to sell yourself as a worker.
It is an insane statement to say that meritocracy doesn't work. If you don't work hard and study you won't be able to even get a job even less a good one.
What is the reshape in its structure that police needs?
What is the big change in education of the police that it needs?
What kind of stressful situations that are not needed?
Who says they are above the law?
Who are the bad apples?
There are single heroes. I've saw many times at instagram reels the little boy who saved his sister from a dog attack (I believe it was a pitbull) he is a hero. But to change a whole society it can't be a one man job even if he is a dictator.
Merit does exist. One thing has nothing to do with the other. You are just denying reality like you do when claiming your gender nonsense.
Governament employees (I see politicians as employees) that fights corruption and to make the world better must be considered heroes. Bolsonaro is a hero. Trump is a hero. Lula and Biden are criminals that shouldn't be I'm power. While also the whole corrupted system that allowed them to get their. The media or in Brazil case the judgement system.
Soviet Union.
You are hurting me with your ideas. Stop talking.
My problem with it is how random it actually would be.
Well I don't know French people so can't tell. I've also heard that Chinese are also very political.
This doesn't work even inside the house with your own family. Imagine in a country.
Like I said minimum wage is meant to create unemployment. I forgot to add that also illegal or informal work too. Not everyone even completes high school. Even less college. Some people can't produce enough to be paid minimum wage therefore you won't get hired. This is specially prejudicial to Youngs trying to join the market and get their first job since you can see that most ads of hiring requires experience.
And dude for God Sakes France has similar level as Brazil in unemployment. That's very high. You really want to destroy the country and see people miserable in poverty. All you care is about the few ones that will remain with the increased minimum wage while a lot more join the unemployment.
Here in Brazil we had the political promise of nursery area to be raid their minimum wage. There are 2 "famous" nurses that made a video saying thanks to Bolsonaro for passing the bill but then saying they would vote for Lula because the two things were unrelated. And the end Lula got elected and removed the raise of their minimum wage. They got mad, protested but ended up without it which is a good thing but not before the employees got fired previously because they knew they wouldn't be able to afford the new wage. So like I said people got unemployment because of it.
In the United States, the late 19th-century ideas for favoring a minimum wage also coincided with the eugenics movement. As a consequence, some economists at the time, including Royal Meeker and Henry Rogers Seager, argued for the adoption of a minimum wage not only to support the worker, but to support their desired semi- and skilled laborers while forcing the undesired workers (including the idle, immigrants, women, racial minorities, and the disabled) out of the labor market. The result, over the longer term, would be to limit the nondesired workers' ability to earn money and have families, and thereby, remove them from the economists' ideal society.[20]
Wtf? Then what will do the raise if production remains the same? You really knows nothing about economics.
What is bullshit? I'm not denting that. I'm saying that an employee that is more skilled is more valuable asset than others. And if there is a need to cut someone out than the less profitable will go.
Meritocracy does exists. It is not simple as just being skilled. I used just for example to be understood. Your skills has to be useful and today world (better start learning how to improve your work with AI you hater) and you need to learn how to sell yourself as a worker.
It is an insane statement to say that meritocracy doesn't work. If you don't work hard and study you won't be able to even get a job even less a good one.
What is the reshape in its structure that police needs?
What is the big change in education of the police that it needs?
What kind of stressful situations that are not needed?
Who says they are above the law?
Who are the bad apples?
There are single heroes. I've saw many times at instagram reels the little boy who saved his sister from a dog attack (I believe it was a pitbull) he is a hero. But to change a whole society it can't be a one man job even if he is a dictator.
Merit does exist. One thing has nothing to do with the other. You are just denying reality like you do when claiming your gender nonsense.
Governament employees (I see politicians as employees) that fights corruption and to make the world better must be considered heroes. Bolsonaro is a hero. Trump is a hero. Lula and Biden are criminals that shouldn't be I'm power. While also the whole corrupted system that allowed them to get their. The media or in Brazil case the judgement system.