Sounds like a you problem. There are some things that just are. And Women and Females, Men and Males is an immutable fact. Just because a small percentage of believe themselves something else, doesn't make it true, they're going against biological facts.
yes and no. i do agree that female and male are biologically factual concepts.

transgenderism is still a thing though, with differing brain activity from the actual sex for example.

but why would that be my problem? more like logikos problem
Post automatically merged:

I just typed half of a lengthy response to describe how what he deems as woke, most anti-woke people don't consider woke, but then I got tired.

So I'm just going to say I'm right and pretend everyone accepts that. :milaugh:
based
 
Ah yes the classic villain with a point trope. Radical leftist going against the status quo and brings up a shit ton of good points, yet is still the villain. Why? Because they always do some generic, mustache twirling evil shit to make sure the audience doesn't side with them. Just bad writing(looking at you Killmonger.)
Yes, indeed, bad writing.

But it goes farther than that. The reality of the problem of modern entertainment is political and it takes its roots into the core values of liberals ideas and precisely the depolitization of said entertainment.
 
A perfect example is the animated Mulan vs lie action Mulan. Both are about gender issues and female empowerment. Difference is that the animated version is an entertaining masterpiece while the live action is a shitty woke disaster.
Not the first or the last one that got ruined :josad:

I saw that she didn't cut her hair in the live action and refused to watch. Mulan cutting her hair is the biggest sign of dedication for a girl of her status and age.
 

Uncle Van

Humans Evolve. Taxes Never Do.
Not the first or the last one that got ruined :josad:

I saw that she didn't cut her hair in the live action and refused to watch. Mulan cutting her hair is the biggest sign of dedication for a girl of her status and age.
The whole movie is about Mulan being the perfect gifted warrior since childhood, but can't realize her true potential because of the partraichy. Her conflict is that she has to pretend to be a man in order to be respected as a warrior. The animated version and the original tale didn't give a shit about respect as a goal. She just wanted to save her father.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
You know something is up when Democrats are coming out and saying the Democrats are weaponizing the law system against Trump. Calling it lawfare instead of beating him at the polls.

I'm not sure if they want to say it or if they feel like they have to, to save face and separate themselves from it, since anyone with common sense has caught onto it is a big sham.
 
@Logiko I'm 7 minutes into the first video. I challenge you to summarize it for me in 3 non-run-on sentences.
- Aristote described the function of Art (and storytelling specifically) as corrective mesures to assure perfection in humanity and that ALL art are subject to, and make up, a sovereign art: Politic.

- As such, what we call "Catharsis" in storytelling today was actually a tool of coercion in Aristote time, as through "Catharsis", negative emotions are purged and those emotions, in his time, were actually the emotions that could push the audience to question the system and the political oppressive status co (like crying for a tragedic dying king that is promoting slavery for ex.)

- What we explain is that this coercion never evolved with time and "Catharsis" and by extention storytelling are still used as tools to prevent people from questionning the status co and promoting liberal and capitalist and sometimes oppressive values (like for example, the fact that radical progressive militants are always depicted as some form of terrorist, when it doesn't really make sence to begin with)


I will had that final one:

A stories is always political and when it tries to avoid this aspect, it usually means that there is a fly in the ointment.
 

Uncle Van

Humans Evolve. Taxes Never Do.
You know something is up when Democrats are coming out and saying the Democrats are weaponizing the law system against Trump. Calling it lawfare instead of beating him at the polls.

I'm not sure if they want to say it or if they feel like they have to, to save face and separate themselves from it, since anyone with common sense has caught onto it is a big sham.
It's a multitude of factors.

1) Biden is completely senile and they try their hardest to hide them, and it makes people lose faith in Biden.

2) Every time someone big or controversial happens, like with Epstein or Hunter Biden, they always focus on or blame Trump.

3) Their obsession with Trump only begged the question as to why don't they have the same energy with other corrupt politicians, which made it obvious they were only trying to kick him out the election race.

4) Republican presidential representive Nikki Haley was revealed to be a democratic plant, as all her endorsements, financial donations and policies were from the democratic party.
 
The whole movie is about Mulan being the perfect gifted warrior since childhood, but can't realize her true potential because of the partraichy. Her conflict is that she has to pretend to be a man in order to be respected as a warrior. The animated version and the original tale didn't give a shit about respect as a goal. She just wanted to save her father.
:lawsigh: way too dumb
 
H

Herrera95

I wasn't talking only about economy. Capitalism is not only an economic system, its a social one as well.
And anarchism has no different from it.

They could call themself communist, but the system wasn't and what they did wasn't.
We also don't have capitalism so what you so butthurt about.

Random means random. It doesn't mean selected on specific attribute.
I thought even someone not blessed by intelligence like you could understand that. There will be corruption. There won't be random selection but selective selection.

You are applying a economic strategy and system that was economicaly quantified and demonstrated (all the economic solutions of LFI) to the situation a house with 3 to 6 people. This is nonsense and this has nothing to do with the subject
It does. Hierarchy system of power works in house and companies and governaments. Micro and macro. Anything different from Capitalism doesn't works not even in a simple house.

If you can't pay someone the minimum wage, don't start a compagny to begin with. Minimum wage is not an option.
In other words you are saying fuck the unemployed people. You don't even understand why you getting paid the value you are getting paid.

In bad societies yes. Start paying people more and they will be able to pay their taxes correctly and live happily.
This is not how economy works. You can't just pay people more and expect things to get better because it doesn't. You will cause inflation and scarcity of resources.

Unemployement is not here because of the value and producing power of people, its here because of a mad management, the belief in meritocracy and very questionniable economic politics.
Unemployment is here because people like you work hard to prevent creation of new jobs and growth of economy.

Yes it does. At least in my country, that's the law. If you pay me less... you will have some problems.
And then you obligate people that are willing to be paid less to be unemployed. And this affects specially uneducated and young people that have no experience in the market. So your solution to minimum wage causes unemployed.

Indeed, minimum wage is not enough. That's why we need to raise it, tax rich people more and redistribute the ressources.
And cause more unemployment. You really hate poor.

Because meritocracy doesn't exist doesn't mean that the system, that believe meritocracy do exist, does not exist. We need to crush the BELIEF and the system that is perpetuating that belief.
Nonsense and illogical.

Actually its not. Sorry. Watch the damn video and EDUCATE yourself.
Try get out of your bubble and look for real data.

Meritocracy is not physics or science, its the opposite, its a myth. A story to keep you believing in the hope that you can become one day a billionaire just because of you efforts and work. If you still believe that after being explained why its a lie and why it does not exist, then you are lost.
Meritocracy exists even in wild animal life or any form of existence in the universe.

Again, there is no such things as communist country in the world.
Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea.

Tell that to teachers in high difficulty area. You don't understand what is hard and what is not. Because someone has knowledge doesn't mean its hard.

Following your logic (that you don't understand yourself), people working on construction site, lifting tons of metal pipes concretes should be millionaires.
Sorry I wasn't raw enough to someone like you to understand. Being a doctor is harder because it requires knowledge and intelligence that not everyone has. Working on construction site depending on your position there doesn't require the same amount of knowledge and intelligence. But of course the people in positions of knowledge and intelligence are earning enough money to be millionaires. Like the CEOs.

Liberals believe in meritocracy, just like you. They are therefore rightist, just like you. Once again, you missed your shot.
Libertarians.

If that was the case, you wouldn't deny a genocide right now. You don't care about people, you only care about your beliefs.
You are the one who deny Hamas being a terrorist group that wants to genocide the Jews not me.

Actually, its your ideas that are provocking poverty mate. Its capitalism and the belief in merits that are in the systems right now. YOUR ideologies, YOUR poisons. Not mine :)
The poverty just minimized more and more ever since capitalism became a thing.
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
- Aristote described the function of Art (and storytelling specifically) as corrective mesures to assure perfection in humanity and that ALL art are subject to, and make up, a sovereign art: Politic.

- As such, what we call "Catharsis" in storytelling today was actually a tool of coercion in Aristote time, as through "Catharsis", negative emotions are purged and those emotions, in his time, were actually the emotions that could push the audience to question the system and the political oppressive status co (like crying for a tragedic dying king that is promoting slavery for ex.)

- What we explain is that this coercion never evolved with time and "Catharsis" and by extention storytelling are still used as tools to prevent people from questionning the status co and promoting liberal and capitalist and sometimes oppressive values (like for example, the fact that radical progressive militants are always depicted as some form of terrorist, when it doesn't really make sence to begin with)


I will had that final one:

A stories is always political and when it tries to avoid this aspect, it usually means that there is a fly in the ointment.
Ok, but how does this change the fact what you view as woke, most people against anti-woke works don't agree? For now at least, writing is created by humans and of course their beliefs and biases will show up in their writing. That doesn't make every story push an agenda as its main purpose.

The problem is things are being woke to be woke. Like changing the little mermaid. Why not create a new fantastic story? Or ghost busters, why change them all to women.
 

TheAncientCenturion

I will never forgive Oda
‎‎‎
The whole movie is about Mulan being the perfect gifted warrior since childhood, but can't realize her true potential because of the partraichy. Her conflict is that she has to pretend to be a man in order to be respected as a warrior. The animated version and the original tale didn't give a shit about respect as a goal. She just wanted to save her father.
The worst aspect of it is they removed Mushu
 
Top