like, is this video the whole campaign?? Where is the part that targets children and showing their sexuality?
From what I read in the article, it's just a pride themed campaign. It's just virtue signaling, that's all there is to it. But my guy here is so retarded he thinks there's this huge conspiracy to turn all children gay for reasons???
 
The whole point of having words and definitions is to have an universal understanding, language it’s pointless without it.
Yes. And the definition works. But its can't explain everything. The concept of meritocracy is a deep subject that a definition is just not enough to translate in its entiererity. Its really not complicated. Just basic sociology.


You’re just confusing everyone when you ignore the commonly understood meaning of words and use your own.
No. I use the term as it is used in the definition and the encyclopedic explanation. Both of them. Its not difficult to understand. If you are confused, which is ok (meritocracy is not necessarally an easy political concept to grasp in its entierity), I proposed content to understand it more in the library. If that's not enough, you can check sociological works or the encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy


Also yes you do give off that stereotype in that conversation with Van.
No. i've just very politically precise when I'm talking. You need to understand completely what Meritocracy means as a political structure and its impacts on every day life. Which is why I made the leftist library in the first place.

I can't expect rightist to understand the problem with meritocracy on the get go, so please, watch those content first. Especially this video, Its extremely important:


like, is this video the whole campaign?? Where is the part that targets children and showing their sexuality?
I think they are just moral panicking because its a "pride" camp.
 
From what I read in the article, it's just a pride themed campaign. It's just virtue signaling, that's all there is to it. But my guy here is so retarded he thinks there's this huge conspiracy to turn all children gay for reasons???
Right so apparently there's a LGBT summer camp this company has been donating to for a few years.

In other news, check this out and use Google translate:
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarete#Kultur a town with 10 genders :suresure: @Logiko @Ravagerblade
[automerge]1712715920[/automerge]
In Amarete everything has a gender, be it people, fields, mountains, objects, offices or rituals. In addition to the two biological genders, people's social gender depends on the gender of their field (wachu gender) and the office they may hold. By combining the two biological sexes with 5 symbolic genders (simple male, female-female, male-female and female-male, male-male), 10 different gender roles result
There's only 2 genders they said. Only biology matters they said :saden::saden:
[automerge]1712716045[/automerge]
“These gender roles play a large role in religion, ritual and everyday life. They determine the order of sitting, walking and acting, the so-called corner and hospitality order and, above all, the complex order of sacrifices in the ritual. By taking on an office, a person’s gender can change, because offices also have a symbolic gender – just like space, time and matter.”
 
Last edited:
The gender of the field results from a sexual symbolization of time and space. For example, older fields are male and younger fields are female.[7] In most cases it has a double gender. Offices in the village community also have a gender and when taking on one, the Wachu gender (“field gender”) must be given up for the duration of the office. Since the village authorities change every year, the officials and subsequently their spouses often undergo a gender change. Depending on the constellation of the existing gender, a change may also be necessary when getting married. Same are considered cheap. In the rituals, concepts from the Andean religion are intertwined with Christian elements and symbolic sexuality in a variety of ways.
 
The gender bs and culture war is an international distraction from real problems. Every time another redneck is twisting his undies from seeing a drag queen the multinational money elites are laughing in pure joy
I know, but I don't have it in me to reach across the aisle and offer a helping hand to these lunatics, they're too far gone.
 
I know, but I don't have it in me to reach across the aisle and offer a helping hand to these lunatics, they're too far gone.
There are real problems out there and these guys are wasting their energy on non existing issues. The opposing side is not much better at times tho. Intentional provocation only divides the people more and doesn't promote tolerance.
It's the same with the immigrant issue.
 
We should all know by now that logiko isnt into definitions
[automerge]1712742622[/automerge]
So instead of sticking to the universal definition, we should instead listen to the made up versions for each individual person. Brilliant!
Exactly. You bigot
[automerge]1712742843[/automerge]
whole point of having words and definitions is to have an universal understanding, language it’s pointless without it.
Bro i tried this before. Your efforts are in vain
 
There are real problems out there and these guys are wasting their energy on non existing issues. The opposing side is not much better at times tho. Intentional provocation only divides the people more and doesn't promote tolerance.
It's the same with the immigrant issue.
People are not living, abandonned, oppressed, killed, killing themself because other are against their identity, so I'm sorry but yes. It's important.

There is no provocation. Don't attack those who fight for LGBTI people, attack the opposition.


We don't talk enough about meritocracy and capitalism in here
We should all know by now that logiko isnt into definitions
Indeed. Definition are by essence restrictive. They are also made generally by people who don't understand the subject or linguistic. But they are not necessarily bad, for example the definition of meritocracy here is good, its just no exhaustive and need to be developped more.


Bro i tried this before. Your efforts are in vain
You tried what ? Not understanding a subject ? Yes indeed, you tried that, and you succeeded.
 
Last edited:
No bitch, telling you the purpose of language and language being obsolete if we stray from definitions everyone and their mothers are using.

Good try i guess though (jk, was real bad)
Definition are the surface Einstein. If you keep your knowledge to the surface level you won't understand things. That's why you don't understand gender and that's why you don't seem to understand meritocracy either.

It only takes a ignorant to prefer a dictionnary definition over a encyclopedic explanation.
 
Definition are the surface Einstein. If you keep your knowledge to the surface level you won't understand things. That's why you don't understand gender and that's why you don't seem to understand meritocracy either.

It only takes a ignorant to prefer a dictionnary definition over a encyclopedic explanation.
I do understand gender and am still one of the few alongside you that actually makes the distinction. Just not my problem that man and woman are based on sex as of now.

And where have i ever talked about meritocracy ?!

Still lame as fuck
 
Top