I think you should both give it a rest to be honest. The host hasn't forbidden it nor took any mechanical action so from a rules standpoint it is permitted. I fully appreciate that it isn't well-liked, you can bring this up after the game to address why it should be explicitly banned going forward. Flower, doubling down on it is pointless, we don't need to repeat the same discussion over and over again.
Let's move on for now. There will be a time and a place for all of this, but having the whole thread be about this isn't going to engage anyone else.
Tbh I don't think he's gonna sandbag this hard as scum. He once mentioned as scum he's generally more active due to sense of obligation. Or trying more to be present.
Neeko won't give this game the time of day regardless of his alignment. I don't know why he signed up but I'm fairly sure this is already way beyond the kind of game he would feel any sort of commitment to due purely due to the way it's setup
Neeko won't give this game the time of day regardless of his alignment. I don't know why he signed up but I'm fairly sure this is already way beyond the kind of game he would feel any sort of commitment to due purely due to the way it's setup
I did identify why he could be town tho. I dunno, I still think he tanked his play intentionally but sour grapes will get me nowhere. Consider me your greatest supporter for the time being while I recharge my scumdar.
Hmm.. is scum Ratcher ever that meek? He usually tries to take charge more day 2. It is day 3 or later when he needs to "reconsider his reads" due to leading mislynches.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.