Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You, by questionning this assertion, and basically your entire discourse about politics support that.
There is no such things as absolute taxing. So of course its based on income. The problem arrives when rich people think they should have a equal % as poor people when in reality they win 1000 time more for some.
Because its just. And for two reasons:
1. The income of rich people does not come out of nowhere, its a result of the production of worker
2. Because winning more means that you have more financial securities and overall stronger impact on society than others, so this must be equalized.
If you want to keep your own money. You take a trip naked in the sahara desert in front of an oasis and you start to build your own town. But as long as you live in society, you have a moral duty to others when you have more.
Actually this IS what being fair means. You are confusing being equal with being just. What you think is that we should have equal treatment in front of society. But you are completely missing the fact that society do not treat us the same and that we do not have the same chances in life.
You are - once again - completely blinded by your belief in meritocracy. In other word, you are blinded by a bias that we call "the belief in a just society".
Its time for you to understand that society is not just. And that your neighboor doesn't necessarily has the same chances as you. This is why when you can, you have a moral duty to help.
No mate, you are completely projecting. I'm doing the opposite.
Its you, right nown with your belief in meritocracy that JUSTIFY a system that believes that people can be rich just by making some efforts. And since its not how reality works, you are justifying a system that keeps the poor poor and make the rich richer.
You are an anarcho capitalist mate. Its not the political side that is taking the side of the oppressed and the work force. Its the side that takes the side of the rich and those who don't want to be responsible for others.
In other words, you are taking the side of selfish peoples.
Its time for you to wake up. You don't want a state ? Fine. I can understand that, ultimately I believe that we should be getting rid of it too. But that does not mean that you should overlook the reality of the world and the reality of SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES.
So you want to have a stateless ideology ? Fine. Then start by understanding materialism, get rid of liberals and idealistic myths like meritocracy and start to learn more about the structural nature of the social field. Then you will have a chance to actually become a real anarchist.
You are completely oblivious if you think you are a revolutionary mate.
Capitalism is LITERALLY our system right now. So being a anarcho capitalism means that you would take this concept and multiplying it by 100.
You are not a revolutionnary, you are the dog of the system. You are literally prepared and willing to multiply the negative effects of the current state of capitalism just to justify its own myth that economic freedom is the graal of the future. You are part of a lunatic group that will act as the executionner of society. Through people like you or Milei, the effects of capitalism will multiply:
- Women will lose more rights
- Climate change will accelerate
- The poor will get less right and will increase in number hundred fold
- Insecurity will multiply
- Racism will rise like never before
- And some war will be started
And what it will create is a faster rise of fascist ideas.
Your ideology is a DANGER.
You need to understand just how out of touch with reality you really are and you need to read some actual science for once.
There is no such things as absolute taxing. So of course its based on income. The problem arrives when rich people think they should have a equal % as poor people when in reality they win 1000 time more for some.
Because its just. And for two reasons:
1. The income of rich people does not come out of nowhere, its a result of the production of worker
2. Because winning more means that you have more financial securities and overall stronger impact on society than others, so this must be equalized.
If you want to keep your own money. You take a trip naked in the sahara desert in front of an oasis and you start to build your own town. But as long as you live in society, you have a moral duty to others when you have more.
Actually this IS what being fair means. You are confusing being equal with being just. What you think is that we should have equal treatment in front of society. But you are completely missing the fact that society do not treat us the same and that we do not have the same chances in life.
You are - once again - completely blinded by your belief in meritocracy. In other word, you are blinded by a bias that we call "the belief in a just society".
Its time for you to understand that society is not just. And that your neighboor doesn't necessarily has the same chances as you. This is why when you can, you have a moral duty to help.
No mate, you are completely projecting. I'm doing the opposite.
Its you, right nown with your belief in meritocracy that JUSTIFY a system that believes that people can be rich just by making some efforts. And since its not how reality works, you are justifying a system that keeps the poor poor and make the rich richer.
You are an anarcho capitalist mate. Its not the political side that is taking the side of the oppressed and the work force. Its the side that takes the side of the rich and those who don't want to be responsible for others.
In other words, you are taking the side of selfish peoples.
Its time for you to wake up. You don't want a state ? Fine. I can understand that, ultimately I believe that we should be getting rid of it too. But that does not mean that you should overlook the reality of the world and the reality of SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES.
So you want to have a stateless ideology ? Fine. Then start by understanding materialism, get rid of liberals and idealistic myths like meritocracy and start to learn more about the structural nature of the social field. Then you will have a chance to actually become a real anarchist.
You are completely oblivious if you think you are a revolutionary mate.
Capitalism is LITERALLY our system right now. So being a anarcho capitalism means that you would take this concept and multiplying it by 100.
You are not a revolutionnary, you are the dog of the system. You are literally prepared and willing to multiply the negative effects of the current state of capitalism just to justify its own myth that economic freedom is the graal of the future. You are part of a lunatic group that will act as the executionner of society. Through people like you or Milei, the effects of capitalism will multiply:
- Women will lose more rights
- Climate change will accelerate
- The poor will get less right and will increase in number hundred fold
- Insecurity will multiply
- Racism will rise like never before
- And some war will be started
And what it will create is a faster rise of fascist ideas.
Your ideology is a DANGER.
You need to understand just how out of touch with reality you really are and you need to read some actual science for once.
That is rich coming from a guy that believes ina ideology that has many genocides and dcitatorships under its belt
I'm not a maoist neither am I a leninist or a stalinist mate
Since when does socialism or even Troskism (since that the ideology I'm the closest to right now) is responsible for many genocide or dictatorships ?
I'm not a maoist neither am I a leninist or a stalinist mate
I'm not a maoist neither am I a leninist or a stalinist mate
[automerge]1716584898[/automerge]
Since when does socialism or even Troskism (since that the ideology I'm the closest to right now) is responsible for many genocide or dictatorships ?
I'm not a maoist neither am I a leninist or a stalinist mate
I'm not a maoist neither am I a leninist or a stalinist mate
