H

Herrera95

man,shut the fuck up. you are disgusting.
Grow up dude. And educate yourself.
[automerge]1718728797[/automerge]
https://www.theguardian.com/world/a...e-sex-marriage-equality-vote-bill-legislation

Thailand is now just one step away to be the third country in Asia to legally recognize Same-Sex Marriage after such plans were introduced last year by government. Only the King can veto now since Thailand is a constitutional monarchy.
That goes for civil marriage right? I don't know why this is so important. What are the benefits of marrying?
[automerge]1718729015[/automerge]
Pedophiles have no place in society.
They actually do. In treatment if they didn't commit any crime. Or in jail if they did.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No it didn't. Turning 18 years old don't magically makes you "available" for sex in nature. Everyone has their own time and it is way earlier. You know pretty well that teenagers are fucking with each other in much younger ages. The paper is just to blame the 18+ who wants to have sex with 18- which is fucking ridiculous since 2 people with 17 would also be considered as pedophiles to each other following the paper "logic".

Pre-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
teenagers starting to fuck =/= thats the age for their sexual maturity. puberty is a process, so the start of puberty also =/= sexual maturity.

sexual maturity also has a psychological aspect to it (this is even true for animals that we breed. . .)

i dont know what paper exactly you are talking about though
[automerge]1718733740[/automerge]
re-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
yeah there are other names for those people, but pedophile is used as an umbrella term for all of those alot by peeps
[automerge]1718733799[/automerge]
They actually do. In treatment if they didn't commit any crime. Or in jail if they did.
true
 
Pre-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
creeps. Weirdos. Degenerates.
[automerge]1718740459[/automerge]
Pedophiles have no place in society.
realistically society needs to find some place for them, wherever that is

You can’t just say “they should all be tortured and killed” because unless you’re living in a country like China or North Korea, that’s not really a workable solution.

tbh I don’t think the current form of mass incarceration is really ethical either.

personally feel like it would be nice if we created some sort of prison colony that unsociable people can be exiled to. Kinda like what they did with Australia back in the day.
 
Last edited:
Stop digging my old posts, fucking stalker.
I found it by chance actually. Nice way to dodge the question tho.
That goes for civil marriage right? I don't know why this is so important. What are the benefits of marrying?
Usually tax benefits, permission to adopt children, legal representation, allowed to visit in hospital etc...
You can’t just say “they should all be tortured and killed”
But I just did ooopsie
 
Grow up dude. And educate yourself.
[automerge]1718728797[/automerge]

That goes for civil marriage right? I don't know why this is so important. What are the benefits of marrying?
[automerge]1718729015[/automerge]

They actually do. In treatment if they didn't commit any crime. Or in jail if they did.
You think these pedo jokes are funny? Are you a retard or a straight up a motherfucker?
I found it by chance actually. Nice way to dodge the question tho.

Usually tax benefits, permission to adopt children, legal representation, allowed to visit in hospital etc...

But I just did ooopsie
Why would i give details about my privacy to a bozo like you?
 
Is not my own definition. Is THE definition. Again you don't even know what you are talking about. You are not prepared for this debate dude.

And no dude. Here in Brazil we have a very smart thing in law called age of consent so I can have relationship with anyone over 13 (not included) years old.
[automerge]1718727530[/automerge]

You only saw cartoon so you are fine.
[automerge]1718727973[/automerge]

No it didn't. Turning 18 years old don't magically makes you "available" for sex in nature. Everyone has their own time and it is way earlier. You know pretty well that teenagers are fucking with each other in much younger ages. The paper is just to blame the 18+ who wants to have sex with 18- which is fucking ridiculous since 2 people with 17 would also be considered as pedophiles to each other following the paper "logic".


Pre-pubescent and that means people younger than 12 years old. So no one is a pedophile by wanting to dating anyone from 13 and above. There are other names for those people.
You're not ready for this debate he says.

You're a massive retard bro, thank God you're a social reject and a wanna be debate bro with 0 rizz. Not even a minor would be dumb enough to associate themselves with you. Hope you get jumped you illiterate pedo.
 
And no dude. Here in Brazil we have a very smart thing in law called age of consent so I can have relationship with anyone over 13 (not included) years old.
I don’t know what the culture is like in Brazil

but if I were to guess, any adult dating a 14 year old would probably be considered a shameless degenerate, regardless of whether or not it’s legal.
 

Daniel

Tani
‎‎‎‎
So, I found this gem of a post from Reddit by the user named OrSpeeder

https://www.reddit.com/r/apocalympics2016/comments/4wp40a
For those wondering, why the "low" age of consent:

Most cultures in the planet, had age of consent around that time, for example in Athenian Greece people made a point to marry girls at that age (something Spartans didn't liked, because pregnancies were riskier).

In Brazil, when the countries all started to bump age of consent to 18 or 21, and introduce strong child porn laws, went along, and put age of consent to 18, and child porn laws the mininum age is 18 too...

This created problems, in many parts of Brazil, people still married at 14, sometimes with both being "underage" (14 year old bride with a 16 year old groom for example), and in the "westernized" parts of Brazil, like São Paulo and Rio, it is normal to lose virginity (usually against parents wishes) in ages between 13 and 17

Thus, age of consent law at 18 was obviously unrealistic, 15 year olds were fucking (and marring in some cultures) like rabbits, and thus you suddenly made a huge swath of the population criminals for no good reason, just to please other countries.

So, a compromise was made:

Age of consent is 14, but if the minor (someone between 14 and 18) complains to the police about being raped, or "seduced", you get harsher punishment (ie: you are treated as pedophile)

Age of consent for sex photos is still 18 (ie: even if you legally marry a 17 year old bride, if you take a picture of her, and someone finds it in your stuff, you get arrested for possession of child porn)

This way Brazil could make other countries happy, while not making most of the teenagers criminals for no reason. (also, "Romeo and Juliet" laws wouldn't work, in Brazil native american communities, or places more isolated, girls frequently marry a guy much older in hopes of having a better life, as those guys usually are already educated and have jobs, and thus can afford taking care of the house financially while the girls finish their education, in contrast to their parents, that might have too many children to support, and can't do it).

EDIT: tl;dr: age of consent law was first 18, it obviously clashed with local culture, thus it was lowered to 14 that makes more sense.
 
Top