Go on, explain how this thread goes anywhere beyond
Character OP dislikes gets bad display "oh, well, shucks"
Character OP likes gets bad display "this is a disgrace. Oda can not draw"
Kaido in Wano got defeated. Very, very underwhelming.
I think Oda should redraw the entire arc. It made no sense that Kaido lost. He clearly did not use his fruit to its full extent.
Shamefur dispray.
I'll try.
The scope of this thread Is lamentig how "uncreatively" the Pika Pika no mi was used. Meaning: Oda could have drawn many different things instead of relagate the Pika Pika to the same three or four things we have already known since the pre-TS.
Having said that, this does not necessarly means that Kizaru would have done better. For example: the clones were probably the most intresting thing Kizaru has shown. Is It something that raise markedly his level, especially against top tiers? I very much doubt It, but It was a creative use of the Pika Pika, a pleasing move to see during the fight and a good add to his moveset.
Following the same logic, instead of seeing Kizaru spamming the same boring (and already seen) kicks again and again, or the same generic lasers aganis and again, It wouldn't have been better to see something...different?
To me, yes.
That more so because light Is one of the most exploited powers in shonen manga universe and there are PLENTY of intresting ideas to use. Oda has been incredibly creative with some minor and more difficult fruits like the Hito Hito or the Mochi Mochi, so this lack of...anything Is quite starting.
Kizaru returned and was struck to use the same generic lasers, light kicks (with one variation at least), the same 2 o 3 things we have already seen. Not one new named move, not even his monkey move in fact (even though we are 99% he has It).
As you can see, this line of thoughts Is exactly the same if you thing Kizaru already showed his 100%. Point Is that we would have preferred that his 100%, meaning with the same end results, had other things "inside", and not just the same boring moveset.