What wars started under Trump?
His « tactics » of peace by fire is troubling. Droning Suleimani was a bet for instance. Same goes for threatening North Korea. These two tyrannies have been wise enough not to start a war. If they had responded with hostilities, then I don’t know what Trump would have done. He would become widely unpopular imo if a full scale war started only because he is cocky and threatens everyone.

Imagine having to explain to the families of US soldiers that their dad or mom died because Trump had a whim and wanted to drone Suleimani… moreover, his actions wouldn’t have to involve US or NATO troops but setting on fire the Middle East or the West-Pacific region doesn’t directly put the US in a position of war. Others would have to suffer the consequences of Trump’s whims before he does. I can feel he would ask Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Ukraine for even more money for their protection that he himself would jeopardize.

I can’t imagine what Ukraine will look like once he will be re-elected. I doubt Putin would just back off. Trump would be playing with fire and burn himself.
 
I am pretty sure sheep go with the main stream in thinking and not against it.
Although I do not like to call people sheep, even far rightist.. I need to point out this:

Trumpist, far rightism and conservatism, are not "against the maintream", right now, they ARE a mainstream.

Or.. rather, they are one of the two social streams in society today:

- One being liberalism and a progressism of facade
- The other being conservatism and reactionnarism

They are on an equal scale, one does not overtake the other.

Those who are going against the current right now, are leftists and what you would call "woke" people. Right now, at the moment where I speak, we (this part of the people) are outnumbered.

In fact, there are three ways you can confirm this or understand it by yourself:

1. There are almost NO leftist gov on the planet (I do not count North Korea and China that are authoritarian dictatorships)
2. We live in a liberal world that is sliding slowly into a reactionnary one. The far right is emerging as victorious pretty much everywhere.
3. You can observes that in most country, the leftists are actually in minority compared to liberal and conservative party.

For the point 3 there are two example that you can look at:

The US : As you can see, there are no big leftist party and there was never a real leftist gouvernment.
France:

Here is the state of the french assembly



- The light blue are hardcore conservatives and the dark blue is the far right party.
- All the Yellow are the pro-capitalist liberals

ALL of them are considered on the right of the political spectrum.
Now,

- The dark pink are the socio democrats. They are the one who created liberal and social traitors like Macron and Hollande in the first place.
- The green are the ecologist (close in ideology to the PS)
- The dark green is the communist party (currently close to social democrats in term of ideology (at least their leader), yes, that's strange, but that's the reality)
- And the Red is LFI, the most radical reformist leftist party (who are not even on the extrem left, the extrem left is in the light pink)

In short, in France, radical leftists (meaning by that, those who want a real disruptive program against liberalism) have only one big choice : LFI.

This coalition (the New popular front) was created on a program set on the basis of a distruption against liberals. And yet, at the moment, the PS, the Communist party and the Ecologist are trying to stab us in the back by pushing for a big coalition with liberals. Which will simply means the end of our disruptive program and real progressive and social change in France.

So as you can see, the scarlet red, is not really present so much EVEN WHEN we technically won the election because of the New popular Front.

France is lucky. We have a strong leftist basis. But most country are not that lucky. In reality most country only have a choice between liberals or proliberal socdems AND Far rightist or extrem conservatist, there is no alternative for them.


So no. Trumpism and other far rightism are not against the system or the mainstream. They are forged and helped by it.
 
Last edited:
His « tactics » of peace by fire is troubling. Droning Suleimani was a bet for instance. Same goes for threatening North Korea. These two tyrannies have been wise enough not to start a war. If they had responded with hostilities, then I don’t know what Trump would have done. He would become widely unpopular imo if a full scale war started only because he is cocky and threatens everyone.

Imagine having to explain to the families of US soldiers that their dad or mom died because Trump had a whim and wanted to drone Suleimani… moreover, his actions wouldn’t have to involve US or NATO troops but setting on fire the Middle East or the West-Pacific region doesn’t directly put the US in a position of war. Others would have to suffer the consequences of Trump’s whims before he does. I can feel he would ask Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Ukraine for even more money for their protection that he himself would jeopardize.

I can’t imagine what Ukraine will look like once he will be re-elected. I doubt Putin would just back off. Trump would be playing with fire and burn himself.
Threatening North Korea on twitter is his best moment, you could feel them sweat from that even across the planet :kobeha:

As to the "whim" stuff, I disagree on that point because none of such missions are done on a whim, all presidents do them and it's deliberated long and hard.
 
No one cares about your made up definitions.
It seems like you do since you intervene. What ? What do you want to tell us ?

That liberals are not really rightists ?
That liberals are progressive ?
That liberalism is not a political and social movement ?
That soft sociodem are not social traitors ?
That radical leftism is the far left ?

What ? What type of confusion do you want to create this time ?
 
It seems like you do since you intervene. What ? What do you want to tell us ?

That liberals are not really rightists ?
That liberals are progressive ?
That liberalism is not a political and social movement ?
That soft sociodem are not social traitors ?
That radical leftism is the far left ?

What ? What type of confusion do you want to create this time ?
Why do you dislike liberals again?
 
I am pretty sure sheep go with the main stream in thinking and not against it.
The mainstream that gave Trump his votes and made him president you mean?
Post automatically merged:

You have never even tried to educate yourself on topics you claim to care about. Have some fucking shame dude, or are you satisfied being such a mediocre bum?
He prefers his head canon over actual reality, having to read about these topics on trustworthy neutral sources would make his brain implode and disintegrate, destroying the foundation of his very being.

And idk, he's clearly not fond of Mexicans. But Trump is Trump after all. I doubt he's changed his mind at all.
And not fond of natives either

Imagine having to explain to the families of US soldiers that their dad or mom died because Trump had a whim and wanted to drone
Many veterans voted for Trump in his first elections because they didn't want more wars.


What ? What do you want to tell us ?
That he wants to distract from your post's content by making fun of your English.
 

Daniel

Don't mind the name tag
‎‎‎‎
The mainstream that gave Trump his votes and made him president you mean?
The mainstream that gave Biden over 50% of the votes and made him president in 2020?

How very convenient that somehow, covid-19 started to spread like wildfire come election time (which may or may not have come from a Wuhan lab 🤔

Almost as if one of covid's intended (even if it could have been accidental) purposes was to make Trump's existing presidency coming close to the 2020 election a complete nightmare...
Post automatically merged:

He prefers his head canon over actual reality, having to read about these topics on trustworthy neutral sources would make his brain implode and disintegrate, destroying the foundation of his very being.
It gets hard when there are websites and article pages that provide extra evidence and/or insight into certain incidents but these either get taken down and/or search engines fail to bring them up to the forefront for more "mainstream articles".
 

Zemmi

GodMommie
The media/democrats want to bury the photo of Trump. I think they miss the fact any damage control of that situation was gone the moment that kid pulled the trigger. Because the glasses the media put over regular people's eyes came off. This inhuman villain, the media/democrats, made Trump out to be crumbled. He bled red; the color drained from his face (something that can't be faked), but he still stood. We saw sadness and relief in not only him, but his family. Now people are asking questions. Trump was one of the most powerful men on the planet before a lot of us were born. He has the means to live a life of luxury and peace, but he chooses to be (wrongly) prosecuted and shot at.

I can't say for sure Trump will win, because we live in a funny world, but it will be hard for him to lose.
Post automatically merged:

Biden seems to have come down with Covid.
 

Daniel

Don't mind the name tag
‎‎‎‎
The media/democrats want to bury the photo of Trump. I think they miss the fact any damage control of that situation was gone the moment that kid pulled the trigger. Because the glasses the media put over regular people's eyes came off.
You got people that continue to peddle the theory that a piece of glass made that hole in Trump's ear except that a picture of the bullet speeding at Trump exists

Never4get
 
Top