Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
"Mom you don't understand, it's a trend to support Comrade Donald, I'm not crazy !!!"
Post automatically merged:
Rate it
Post automatically merged:
Dein trotel niveau is uber 9000
As expected. Another guy who wanted to be a famous killer.
Thanks to the guy on the couch for shedding some lights on us
Haven't you once stated that you were close to Trotsky's "ideology" ? Or am I mixing things up with soemone else ??
Thanks to the guy on the couch for shedding some lights on us
Post automatically merged:
Still not a communist.
Reformist here.
Reformist here.
As expected. Another guy who wanted to be a famous killer.
Thanks to the guy on the couch for shedding some lights on us
Haven't you once stated that you were close to Trotsky's "ideology" ? Or am I mixing things up with soemone else ??
Thanks to the guy on the couch for shedding some lights on us
Post automatically merged:
Haven't you once stated that you were close to Trotsky's "ideology" ? Or am I mixing things up with soemone else ??
Don't even start.
Yes, I did say that.
I'm close to the marxist ideology. So if I had to choose between leninism and troskysm, I would rather be a troskyst since my knowledge of the movement (which is not great) depicts it has a much more democratic and plurial current.
But overall, and maybe this is my lack of knowledge on the subject that prevent me to see that, but I feel like communism and the seek for socialism (the ideal classless society for Marx) lacks a failsafe to prevent people like Staline or Mao to arrive in power.
We cannot allow the massacre of our political ennemies or the oppression of the population in any case. Also, I have reserves on the dictature of the proleteriat, a one unique party seems to be a very dangerous and risky approach even tho I understand its necessity for the working class to rise above the bourgeoisie.
That's why although I may be very radical and I may lean someday toward either anarchist or communist ideals, I'm still a reformist.
Yes, I did say that.
I'm close to the marxist ideology. So if I had to choose between leninism and troskysm, I would rather be a troskyst since my knowledge of the movement (which is not great) depicts it has a much more democratic and plurial current.
But overall, and maybe this is my lack of knowledge on the subject that prevent me to see that, but I feel like communism and the seek for socialism (the ideal classless society for Marx) lacks a failsafe to prevent people like Staline or Mao to arrive in power.
We cannot allow the massacre of our political ennemies or the oppression of the population in any case. Also, I have reserves on the dictature of the proleteriat, a one unique party seems to be a very dangerous and risky approach even tho I understand its necessity for the working class to rise above the bourgeoisie.
That's why although I may be very radical and I may lean someday toward either anarchist or communist ideals, I'm still a reformist.
We have 3 options:
1. Have a contested convention where delegates choose a new nominee.
2. Call for a lightning primary elections where we decide within a day who’ll be the nominee.
3. Let Kamala take over the Biden campaign. She’s the only one that can legally make use of the money the Campaign has raised.
1. Have a contested convention where delegates choose a new nominee.
2. Call for a lightning primary elections where we decide within a day who’ll be the nominee.
3. Let Kamala take over the Biden campaign. She’s the only one that can legally make use of the money the Campaign has raised.
