Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem loli real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
The Babylonbee is funny.
1.) Goliath claims he only lost because h fought David on slightly sloped surface.
2.) Secret Service reveals head of trump security was Chief Wiggum.
3.) Trump disappointed nurse didn't give him dinosaur bandage.
4.) 'Let's settle this at the ballot box,' says party that tried to kick trump of ballots
5.) Vance Dons Helmet and Body armor in preparation to run with trump
6.) "Welp, nothing we can do now,' sighs secret service after assassin climbs on modestly-sloped roof
7.) Secret service director assures nation she wasn't trying to get trump killed, she's just extremely incompetent
8.) Political Analysts predict winner of the presidential race will probably be the one who survives until November
9.) Oh No! Piece of ear shot off trump begins to grow into second trump
10.) Woman worried her eyebrows aren't stupid enough (added this one just because it's funny)
11.) Trump indicted for inciting assassination attempt
12.) JD Vance horrified to lean he must now use truth social
13.) Secret Service vows to find out what went wrong at the trump rally as soon as the figure out who left cocaine in the white house.
14,) Biden Tells Americans that we must eliminate political violence and also Donald Trump
15.) Secret Service beefs up Trump's security with squad of blind midgets
16.) FBI wonders if perhaps they've been investigating the wrong people this whole time
17. Trump safe, leaving only one dead candidate
18.) CNN: Clumsy Trump hits head on bullet.
19.) Party that called Trump Hitler for 8 years shocked as someone tries to assassinate him
1.) Goliath claims he only lost because h fought David on slightly sloped surface.
2.) Secret Service reveals head of trump security was Chief Wiggum.
3.) Trump disappointed nurse didn't give him dinosaur bandage.
4.) 'Let's settle this at the ballot box,' says party that tried to kick trump of ballots
5.) Vance Dons Helmet and Body armor in preparation to run with trump
6.) "Welp, nothing we can do now,' sighs secret service after assassin climbs on modestly-sloped roof
7.) Secret service director assures nation she wasn't trying to get trump killed, she's just extremely incompetent
8.) Political Analysts predict winner of the presidential race will probably be the one who survives until November
9.) Oh No! Piece of ear shot off trump begins to grow into second trump
10.) Woman worried her eyebrows aren't stupid enough (added this one just because it's funny)
11.) Trump indicted for inciting assassination attempt
12.) JD Vance horrified to lean he must now use truth social
13.) Secret Service vows to find out what went wrong at the trump rally as soon as the figure out who left cocaine in the white house.
14,) Biden Tells Americans that we must eliminate political violence and also Donald Trump
15.) Secret Service beefs up Trump's security with squad of blind midgets
16.) FBI wonders if perhaps they've been investigating the wrong people this whole time
17. Trump safe, leaving only one dead candidate
18.) CNN: Clumsy Trump hits head on bullet.
19.) Party that called Trump Hitler for 8 years shocked as someone tries to assassinate him
A liberal in general is someone who wants the govenrment to enforce social equality, but at the same is pro capitalist. They tend to seek change gradually(politicians only when it's to their benefit).
Also, the idiots on the View tried to pretend they had nothing to do with it, despite saying that wearing a MAGA hat is no different than wearing a swastika.
Post automatically merged:
Also, the idiots on the View tried to pretend they had nothing to do with it, despite saying that wearing a MAGA hat is no different than wearing a swastika.
Each of those things ARE forms of racism, yes.
Apolitical with liberal tendancy. That's what I would call you.
You try to stand above the political (as if this was a legitimate position) and you defend some of the same value current liberals have about politics and society.
You are not a far rightist
You are not a conservatist or a libertarian (at least, you never mentionned those views here, well you did developp a racist rethoric at one point but I think it was more of a lack of understanding rather than a real ideology thingy)
You are not a leftist since you would be able to understand why politics are important and why we should always moderate toxic behaviors, especially transphobic ones. Also, you would be on my side even if you dislike my ego or my way to talk.
And you are definitely not a far leftist or a revolutionnary.
This only left two things : The liberal side. The "centrist" way, the one that doesn't take risks or the apolitical side, the one that doesn't care.
My belief is that you are an apolitical that sometimes tends to care... especially when it comes to ridiculize leftism. Which makes you in my eyes a apolitical with liberal tendancies.
I've demonstrated what liberalism is, but go ahead, you seems to have skin in the game ! So what do you want Van ?
Tell us, what do you stand for !
I spent literally 2 second on my research on googl bra.. The point was not to make a scientific documentation, but to make a point. Explaining that it doesn't take much time to understand the inherant racism of Trump and his white supremacist followers.
Still not a communist.
Reformist here.
I'm am an internet anti-Fa tho. You got that right.
Apolitical with liberal tendancy. That's what I would call you.
You try to stand above the political (as if this was a legitimate position) and you defend some of the same value current liberals have about politics and society.
You are not a far rightist
You are not a conservatist or a libertarian (at least, you never mentionned those views here, well you did developp a racist rethoric at one point but I think it was more of a lack of understanding rather than a real ideology thingy)
You are not a leftist since you would be able to understand why politics are important and why we should always moderate toxic behaviors, especially transphobic ones. Also, you would be on my side even if you dislike my ego or my way to talk.
And you are definitely not a far leftist or a revolutionnary.
This only left two things : The liberal side. The "centrist" way, the one that doesn't take risks or the apolitical side, the one that doesn't care.
My belief is that you are an apolitical that sometimes tends to care... especially when it comes to ridiculize leftism. Which makes you in my eyes a apolitical with liberal tendancies.
I've demonstrated what liberalism is, but go ahead, you seems to have skin in the game ! So what do you want Van ?
Tell us, what do you stand for !
I spent literally 2 second on my research on googl bra.. The point was not to make a scientific documentation, but to make a point. Explaining that it doesn't take much time to understand the inherant racism of Trump and his white supremacist followers.
Still not a communist.
Reformist here.
I'm am an internet anti-Fa tho. You got that right.
Actually, that's the opposite of the position of most liberals. Liberals tend to consider that the system is well rounded or, when they notice that its not (because leftists and researchers pushes their butts), they will change the system, but will refuse to create an ADAPTATIVE system.
There is a reason why we do denounce the pink washing, its a liberal way of using progressive ideas.
In short, they will applicate what I explained here:
When a liberal understand that universalism is a fraud and that when must make very specific social politics. It will usually radicalize toward the left and notice that this must be applied to all sorts of domains. With the end of the belief in universalism usually come the end of the belief in color blindness AND meritocracy and the education in human sciences..
So it would be completely dumb for a person without those beliefs to keep thinking that capitalism but be maintain or reenforced. If such a person exist, they won't stay long a liberal or they will have to live with a LOT of contradictions (which is possible)
Those are the social democrats. Liberal want to keep the status co or (for the most radicals) reeforce it.
Social democrats are socialist who understand the importance of applying social changes but don't believe in a radical change of system.
That's why I don't call myself a social democrats but a radical leftist. I'm still reformist, but I want actual radical change, different than those of the current social democrats in the US or in Europe.
The important word here is STATUS CO.
Liberals do not want to change the system, they want to adapt progressism to said system. That's we have the illusion that democrates are pushing a progressive agenda. They are not. They are trying to adapt progressism and social progress to the system.
And any leftist knows that you can't have progress without changing the system first the the way the economy works.
Conservative / Libertarian / Fascist and far rightist want to go backward.
Liberals want to stay put
Leftists want to go forward.
Its really as simple as that.
There is a reason why we do denounce the pink washing, its a liberal way of using progressive ideas.
In short, they will applicate what I explained here:
When a liberal understand that universalism is a fraud and that when must make very specific social politics. It will usually radicalize toward the left and notice that this must be applied to all sorts of domains. With the end of the belief in universalism usually come the end of the belief in color blindness AND meritocracy and the education in human sciences..
So it would be completely dumb for a person without those beliefs to keep thinking that capitalism but be maintain or reenforced. If such a person exist, they won't stay long a liberal or they will have to live with a LOT of contradictions (which is possible)
Those are the social democrats. Liberal want to keep the status co or (for the most radicals) reeforce it.
Social democrats are socialist who understand the importance of applying social changes but don't believe in a radical change of system.
That's why I don't call myself a social democrats but a radical leftist. I'm still reformist, but I want actual radical change, different than those of the current social democrats in the US or in Europe.
The important word here is STATUS CO.
Liberals do not want to change the system, they want to adapt progressism to said system. That's we have the illusion that democrates are pushing a progressive agenda. They are not. They are trying to adapt progressism and social progress to the system.
And any leftist knows that you can't have progress without changing the system first the the way the economy works.
Conservative / Libertarian / Fascist and far rightist want to go backward.
Liberals want to stay put
Leftists want to go forward.
Its really as simple as that.
I tend to be more critical of democrats and the left since they the ones claiming to be your friend. Makes them more hypocritical.
Never said I think there's no hope or is OK with the current situation. Also never said all politicians are dangerous.
So once again you just making stuff up. Not apolitical still by definition. I rarely speak on my personal beliefs and values in general.
Never said I think there's no hope or is OK with the current situation. Also never said all politicians are dangerous.
So once again you just making stuff up. Not apolitical still by definition. I rarely speak on my personal beliefs and values in general.