The real question is about owning up to your actions. If you fucked and got pregnant, it is your responsibility to raise your kids. A children is not a virus, its not an invasive agent that got into your body uninvited.
A foetus is not a child.
its a potential one. This is exactly what it is. And no. its not the responsibility of the woman to let a foetus grow inside of her body without her consant.
That's her body, therefore its HER choice. Not yours and not mine.
My god, you are a fucked in the head if you truly think like that.
Imagine trying to jump through all those asinine hoops to come up with a justification.
Its a simple logical thought experiment mate. For a woman, its exactly what is happening when said pregnancy is unwanted.
You might not like it, for whatever reactionnary reason, but that's how reality is.
Abortion is murder and they're taking a baby's right to live
Nop.
Stop trying to control the body of women.
That allegory says the kid is a parasite basically and the women has the right to stop the pregnancy cause its taking away nutrients and stuff from the mother.
Which is EXACTLY what is happening in real life in the case of an unwanted pregnancy.
You consider a foetus's right as more important than the rights of a woman. Your stance is therefore a reactionnary and foudamentally sexist one.
Remember, a foetus, is nothing more than a blob of skin and tissu with electrical signals without consciences and nothing to feel pain. In fact in the matter, a simple mouse is FAR MORE advanced biologically than a feotus and should therefore be far more prioritized in term of the "right of life".
But its strange.. I don't see people fighting for mouses here.. only for their THOUGHTS of what a human life is. This is an absolute moral hill. This is the beliefs in you that life is sacred.
In reality, for people like you, life is only sacred when it comes to reconsider the rights of women. In reality you don't care about life. Because if that was the case, you would fight on my side for the rights of oppressed people in society, women, racialized people, lgbtqi+, poor people, handicaped...
But no. In reality, you are defending politics and political people that attack those of oppressed ones. Worst, guys like you refuse to recognize their oppression in most cases.
So no. You don't care about life or the life of a baby.
You only care about your ideology, your moral standard and the control over women's body.
You know who lmao. Also because I have dozens of personal experiences with people like that. My career fields makes you see the worst of humanity. The self righteous nutjob has always been one of the most dangerous kinds of people.
It's crazy how the most self righteous people tend to be individuals who've never experienced true hardship. It's like a rich person born into wealth calling poor people lazy. Or someone who rarely interacts with kids trying to scold parents about raising children.
Van, taking the side of anti-abortion people.
Weird right ?
It's a really terrible argument for why abortion should be legal lol
No, its the best one. Its the one that take the choice and rights of women into account instead of discussing the potential lifelyhood of a blob of skin.
The dude is trying to push this narrative that the baby's intruding on it's mother's body and that it's bad for her, but it's not like it's a conscious choice for the baby either, it didn't ask to be born.
And it wasn't a conscious choice from the violonnist either. And yet here we are. A a parasiting situation. And the question :
Do we want to prioritize the right of the woman.
the baby has no say in this.
In reality, the baby (which is just really a foetus can't even think or feel. So yeah... it will be difficult for that blob to "have a say in this"
Problem is Logiko is brainwashed by the anit-human agenda
In reality, i'm the most Pro human here. The real anti-human are the one I'm reaponsing to right now.
Again, you are people who are literally voting and acting against the interesting of oppressed people.
So don't give me that "we are pro human" sh*t. YOU ARE NOT.
You guys are far right, uninformed, uneducated and reactionnary people who don't CARE AT ALL about real human life.
You prefer to stand on the hill of the moral ideas that a blob of life is more important that the rights of a woman over her own body.
You guys are simply despicable.
I don't hate you, but I don't like you.
Who was being transphobic lolgiko?
RebelliousSoma was transphobic. And Xione and you promoted the idea that transphobia is not really transphobia.
Transphobia is not only about the fear of trans people. Transphobia regroups all the discrimination that trans people are facing. So sayin that we should not accept trans people is transphobic.
Yes, twice:
Elon Musk, talking about the reason why he wants to destroy the "woke mind virus" : "My son Xavier is dead because of the woke mind virus"
Reality : His daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson (a transwoman, born Xavier Musk) choosed to undergo therapy to become her real self. In front of the transphobic point of view of her father and his lack of support, she choosed to cut ties with him and take her mother's name.
The richest man on the planet is one of the most transphobic people there is. He rejected his own family because of his bigotry.
This is what the far right is. This is who Trump and his followers are.
Also..
I'm just came across this twitter thread from
@ChaykaHackso (
A famous french youtube creator and trans woman speaking about critical thinking related to social behaviors, https://www.youtube.com/@hacking-social ) talking about the recent video of Musk translated from French :
<< Musk has vowed to destroy a chimera (which he calls "woke virus") and to fight against transidentity because his daughter is trans.
She is now an adult and - you guessed it - has cut ties with this father who considers her a "dead son".
Unfortunately, it is sometimes one of the consequences of our transitions: loved ones who now consider us "dead", as if we had become someone else, that this other had stolen their "son"/"daughter" from them. , friend, etc. Because deep down, these are people who consider their child like things, a possession which must correspond to their expectation/whim. Otherwise it's rejection. These same people who will then talk to us about child "protection", "woke" threats, when they are only neglectful, abusive parents, narcissists.
It's always heartbreaking when this kind of hateful rejection occurs (from parents), but imagine if that parent is one of the most powerful men in the country, and has one of the most popular Social Network in the world. This is Musk, this is the why of many of his choices as a business captain, owner of X which he made completely open to transphobic insults and harassment.
Strength to all children who have such parents, it is from them that we must protect you! >>
.. So i'm adding "partially inhuman" to the list.