Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
And @Logiko btw I'm not shaming you for supporting abortion, that by it self isn't some grand crime, but I did find it kind of hypocritical for you to say that given your past comments on murder.
If you ask me, I value even an unborn baby's life, because of how much potential they have. That baby could be very important in the future, and they deserve to experience life, it's a very pleasurable experience sometimes.
However, I get why you think it should be legal, after all if a girl is raped (especially if they're a young girl who can't take care of a child) she should be able to have an abortion (or at least put it up for adoption or something, I don't know)
no i don't
If you ask me, I value even an unborn baby's life, because of how much potential they have. That baby could be very important in the future, and they deserve to experience life, it's a very pleasurable experience sometimes.
However, I get why you think it should be legal, after all if a girl is raped (especially if they're a young girl who can't take care of a child) she should be able to have an abortion (or at least put it up for adoption or something, I don't know)
Post automatically merged:
no i don't
I'm fine, thanks :)
You know nothing John doe
The story goes like this :
"You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you "
"Thomson argues that one can permissibly unplug oneself from the violinist even though this will cause his death; this is due to limits on the right to life, which does not include the right to use another person's body, and so by unplugging the violinist one does not violate his right to life but merely deprives him of something – the use of someone else's body – to which he has no right. "
This is an allegory for abortion.
The question is not about the status of the life or non life of the body.
The question must stand on the right of women's body to accept OR NOT to let a POTENTIAL someone take over her body's ressources and life.
"Thomson says that abortion does not violate the fetus's legitimate right to life but merely deprives the fetus of something – the non-consensual use of the pregnant woman's body and life-supporting functions – to which it has no right. Thus, by choosing to terminate her pregnancy, Thomson concludes that a pregnant woman does not normally violate the fetus's right to life but merely withdraws its use of her own body, which usually causes the fetus to die "
Simple.
I consider that women rights need to be considered FIRST.
You know nothing John doe
The story goes like this :
"You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you "
"Thomson argues that one can permissibly unplug oneself from the violinist even though this will cause his death; this is due to limits on the right to life, which does not include the right to use another person's body, and so by unplugging the violinist one does not violate his right to life but merely deprives him of something – the use of someone else's body – to which he has no right. "
This is an allegory for abortion.
The question is not about the status of the life or non life of the body.
The question must stand on the right of women's body to accept OR NOT to let a POTENTIAL someone take over her body's ressources and life.
"Thomson says that abortion does not violate the fetus's legitimate right to life but merely deprives the fetus of something – the non-consensual use of the pregnant woman's body and life-supporting functions – to which it has no right. Thus, by choosing to terminate her pregnancy, Thomson concludes that a pregnant woman does not normally violate the fetus's right to life but merely withdraws its use of her own body, which usually causes the fetus to die "
Simple.
I consider that women rights need to be considered FIRST.
The real question is about owning up to your actions. If you fucked and got pregnant, it is your responsibility to raise your kids. A children is not a virus, its not an invasive agent that got into your body uninvited. Children are the result of your actions. Abortion is legalizing infanticide as a means of pregnancy control. Infanticide is murder.
Imagine how cruel one can be to destroy a life you generated just cause you don't feel like being bothered by it. Have you ever googled how an abortion is done? They literally chop up the kid inside the uterus. That allegory is bullshit. The premise is false. The kid isn't taking you hostage, it is the other way around. That mother and father generated that life. It's their responsability.
Imagine how cruel one can be to destroy a life you generated just cause you don't feel like being bothered by it. Have you ever googled how an abortion is done? They literally chop up the kid inside the uterus. That allegory is bullshit. The premise is false. The kid isn't taking you hostage, it is the other way around. That mother and father generated that life. It's their responsability.
Last edited: