Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
And you keep on going. Sigh
Just male is correct. This is the scientific and medical consensus !
https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender
A boy can have male OR female characteristics.
You need to start understanding that fact or I will keep calling out your transphobic rethoric.
We are not talking about feotus here. But human babies that are butchered at birth.
Just male is correct. This is the scientific and medical consensus !
https://orwh.od.nih.gov/sex-gender
A boy can have male OR female characteristics.
You need to start understanding that fact or I will keep calling out your transphobic rethoric.
We are not talking about feotus here. But human babies that are butchered at birth.
You will have to learn the difference mate. At least if you want to be on the right side of history and live happely with trans people.
Not really no.
Your critic will never be deprived of a context. By criticizing the religion of believers when said believers are under oppression, you will add a layer of pressure on them and your critic could be used as a way to attack them directly.
Again, I repeat, your critic can't be deprived from its context and the context in which you are making said critic.
The same way that you will not sh*t on the husband of a widow during the period of mourning, its non pertinent and potentially dangerous to make a blind critic of a religion of people who are under oppression.
I say blind critic because there are good critics to make about religions.. but its also not our place to take the place of believers to create a critical vision of their own belief. If we keep on criticizing globally a system, we negate the possibility to let a voice of critic flourish inside said system.
Said voices must be helped (only if necessary), but not replaced.
Not really no.
Your critic will never be deprived of a context. By criticizing the religion of believers when said believers are under oppression, you will add a layer of pressure on them and your critic could be used as a way to attack them directly.
Again, I repeat, your critic can't be deprived from its context and the context in which you are making said critic.
The same way that you will not sh*t on the husband of a widow during the period of mourning, its non pertinent and potentially dangerous to make a blind critic of a religion of people who are under oppression.
I say blind critic because there are good critics to make about religions.. but its also not our place to take the place of believers to create a critical vision of their own belief. If we keep on criticizing globally a system, we negate the possibility to let a voice of critic flourish inside said system.
Said voices must be helped (only if necessary), but not replaced.
Last edited:
Yeah I guess let's use the Olympics to mock each other, that's the Olympic spirit. I wonder why out of the 3 main religions of the area you hopeless cowards chose to mock Christianity.
Despite the efforts of people like you, Western states being secular only means that religions don't directly affect their institutions. It doesn't mean that the state itself is atheistic or that it encourages discrimination against its religious citizens.
But I liked how you said that it sanctifies the right to blasphemy, it really shows that you live your atheism in an almost religious way.
Despite the efforts of people like you, Western states being secular only means that religions don't directly affect their institutions. It doesn't mean that the state itself is atheistic or that it encourages discrimination against its religious citizens.
But I liked how you said that it sanctifies the right to blasphemy, it really shows that you live your atheism in an almost religious way.