Current Events Its official now Marco made flame-on Alber bleed from mouth

[CbShadow]

Marco attacked flame mode King twice and we see 2 to 3 droplets of a unknown red liquor from King.

Marco never stated he made King bleed or he damaged him. He decided to let Zoro fight King because he couldn't beat King.

Zoro attacks flame mode King once and we see alot of an unknown red liquid spewing from his body.

Zoro later said new never made King bleed. Marco never confirmed he made King bleed.

One out of three things must be true.

1 - Marco and Zoro both damaged King and made him bleed before Oda retconned it.

2 - Oda made a mistake.

3 - The red liquid wasn't blood.

It doesn't matter which one people pick. The point is now King wasn't damaged back then.

 

[Erkan12]

Been telling people for a long time Marco was an Yonko candidate for a reason and that they don't know how to scale him lmao.
.

Yup, and ZKKfans are still coping with saying things like retcon or unknown red liquor etc

We see when Zolo's attacks aren't working, Alber immediately counter attacks him and and shows his superiority vs Zolo in 1 v 1. No way that Zolo before power up could fight Alber+Queen 1 v 2 at the same time for that long when he couldn't even fight 1 v 1 with Alber in a very short time.

If Marco's attack wasn't working on Alber it would be impossible for him to fight 1 v 2 Alber and also Queen distracting him for a long time like almost 20 chapters. Marco's speed and AP was superior to Zolo's before Zolo's power up.

.
Holding off 2 commanders right after clashing with Big Mom puts him at bare minimum Kat level.

Marco's speed and AP surpasses Kata's speed and AP, Kata's FS defense is good but wouldn't be enough for Marco.

 

[CbShadow]

I'm still waiting for someone to provide me a scene where Marco states he damaged King and made him bleed.

Until that happens Marco didn't damage King or make him bleed.

 

[TheLastBerserker]

I'm still waiting for someone to provide me a scene where Marco states he damaged King and made him bleed.

Until that happens Marco didn't damage King or make him bleed.

>taking everything a character says as facts all the time when Oda shows the opposite and makes mistakes
reminds me of a certain Youtuber claiming for years that Luffy will return to WCI because he "said so."

 

[LolonoisZolo]

@Erkan12 Where was the blood when King took out his mask ? He seemed pretty clean! Did he take a shower before fighting Zoro ?

 

[CbShadow]

>taking everything a character says as facts all the time when Oda shows the opposite and makes mistakes
reminds me of a certain Youtuber claiming for years that Luffy will return to WCI because he "said so."

So you are willing to acknowledge Oda can we inconsistent and make mistakes but you know for fact that Marco damaged King and made him bleedd even though that goes against the manga. You remind me a lot of people in this on worst gen.

 

[TheLastBerserker]

So you are willing to acknowledge Oda can we inconsistent and make mistakes but you know for fact that Marco damaged King and made him bleedd even though that goes against the manga. You remind me a lot of people in this on worst gen.

its clear as day Oda didnt have Kings abilities be extremely consistent from the beginning

 

[CbShadow]

its clear as day Oda didnt have Kings abilities be extremely consistent from the beginning

Exactly, that's the point.

Marco and Zoro both injured King first but Oda changed his power so he could provide a challenge to Zoro and help them grow stronger.

 

[TheLastBerserker]

Exactly, that's the point.

Marco and Zoro both injured King first but Oda changed his power so he could provide a challenge to Zoro and help them grow stronger.

I dont think thats any justification to downplay Marco whatsover or be like characters words are facts no matter what

 

[CbShadow]

I dont think thats any justification to downplay Marco whatsover or be like characters words are facts no matter what

There's no down play. People need to except the fact Oda changed how King's powers work so Marco damaging him is no longer relevance.The same as Zoro's first attack.

 

[TheLastBerserker]

There's no down play. People need to except the fact Oda changed how King's powers work so Marco damaging him is no longer relevance.The same as Zoro's first attack.

ehhhh it more so highlights that Marco has good AP and its just that holding off a second and first commander along with all the other stuff Marco did matters more than people want to admit.

 

[CbShadow]

ehhhh it more so highlights that Marco has good AP and its just that holding off a second and first commander along with all the other stuff Marco did matters more than people want to admit.

You refusing to accept Oda changed King's power doesn't make Marco any weaker or stronger.

 

[nik87]

Official colored.

Despite Alber's mask covering his mouth, there are so much blood its not enough to stop leaking.

For example, if it was a small mouth blood like when Jozu made Aokiji bleed, the mask would cover Aokiji's blood completely that we wouldn't see Aokiji's blood, it wouldn't leak from his mask, but Alber is bleeding so bad that the mask on his mouth isn't covering it completely.

Right before the attack, Alber is in flame-on mode.

Marco's attack power is underrated, he gave an internal damage to flame-on Alber while also fighting with Queen in 2 v 1.

Among plenty of lame threads, this one is the lamest, Erkek... Using internet explorer or just wishful bait?

 

[Erkan12]

ehhhh it more so highlights that Marco has good AP and its just that holding off a second and first commander along with all the other stuff Marco did matters more than people want to admit.

Let the ZKKlosers cope, those clowns still think Pre-Koh Zolo's AP was anywhere near close to Marco's AP, comparing Marco's AP to Pre-Koh Zolo's weakass AP then saying it should be retcon just because Pre-Koh Zolo failed to hurt Alber is as dumb as ZKK.

 

[Rumble]

Marco would pack them both up on the same day, just not at the same.

 

[ImmaIvanoM]

Let the ZKKlosers cope, those clowns still think Pre-Koh Zolo's AP was anywhere near close to Marco's AP, comparing Marco's AP to Pre-Koh Zolo's weakass AP then saying it should be retcon just because Pre-Koh Zolo failed to hurt Alber is as dumb as ZKK.

You’re still yapping yet youeve failed to explain the difference between what Zoro did and what Marco did

 

[Erkan12]

You’re still yapping yet youeve failed to explain the difference between what Zoro did and what Marco did

You were believing in strawberry jam nonsense, your IQ is too low like ZKKclowns Robin swan's and Lik's, it shouldn't be surprising you don't understand basic things.

The difference,

1- Alber was still bleeding from mouth next page after Marco hit him, while after Zolo hit him, Alber wasn't bleeding from mouth and there was no blood next page. You were coping with strawberry jam when I said this.

2- Zolo himself admitted his attack not working thats why he was losing 1 v 1 badly in less than 10 chapters, meanwhile not once Marco said his attacks not working, and if his attacks didn't work, it would be impossible for him to fight Alber+Queen 1 v 2 for almost 20 chapters and still not lose.

Marco's AP was on different level than Pre-Koh Zolo's AP thats why clown, only retards would deny this.

 

[ImmaIvanoM]

Zolo himself admitted his attack not working

Zoro specifically said he cannot make King bleed.

So be specific… Zoro is unable to make king bleed… So King produces red liquid that’s not Blood.

This is canon.

Now explain why Marco is also not producing this same red liquid when he hits King?

Post automatically merged: Sep 1, 2024

Marco's AP was on different level than Pre-Koh Zolo's AP

Also Zoro has never been able to damage a lunarian… He says so in Egghead… So The Zoro who scarred Kaido can’t damage a lunarian… KoH Zoro can’t damage a lunarian. And Egghead Zoro cannot damage a lunarian

In fact In Egghead Zoro is telling lufffy that Luffy also cannot damage a lunarian so according to Zoro, Lunarian durability is also above an Emperor’s AP