Powers & Abilities Debunking Literally Every Argument Against Ryokugyu’s Black Blade UPDATE: Confirmed! 09/04/2024

Does Ryokugyu Have A Black Blade?

  • Total voters
    218
D

Dragon777

‎
#1,361
#1,361
CbShadow said:
I'm blind but you're the one who chose to ignore the lines in his arms.

Ever since that scene I have been called delusional because believing a character who's actively using blackened haki coating his sword with the same haki is somehow dumb even though that's common post TS.

Now, since the vivre card was released, that uses the same scenes from manga, that same fan base is back on their BS because they refuse to accept reality.

You and your fan base are now stuck between a rock and a hard place. Either you have to accept the vivre made a mistake by not coating his fingertips with haki which means his sword could be black because it's coated in haki or you have to accept the color of his fingertips doesn't matter and neither sword.

Have fun.
Click to expand...
Same: have fun.

Showed black two times in different situations, confirmed in volume, confirmed in VC and we are the one who refuses to accept reality. OK.
Post automatically merged:

trav said:
Repeat after me: non-canon source
A crayon eating diversity hire colored that.

Anyone who voted yes, are you willing to bet your account?
Permanent delete, no alts. Sayo nara forever.
Click to expand...
@trav

Repeat after me: Databook. Databook are official.
 
CbShadow

CbShadow

‎
#1,363
#1,363
Dragon777 said:
Same: have fun.

Showed black two times in different situations, confirmed in volume, confirmed in VC and we are the one who refuses to accept reality. OK.
Click to expand...
I'm having fun.

Where was it confirmed? Where did it say the sword is a black blade?

All you have are images taken from the manga where he used blackened haki at the time.


The entire argument GB has a black blade comes from a manga scene where he is actively using blackened haki. That not much if anything.
 
DKI

DKI

‎
#1,369
#1,369
No reason in hell Fujitora doesn't have a black blade, neither did Roger, nor Shanks, but Aramaki does. And he does while never even fighting with it.
Wtf is the point of this shit.
Aramaki's power introduction in Wano is now even worse.
If the vivre card doesn't say anything about him wielding a black black then it's not confirmed yet and I hope that it doesn't get confirmed ever cause it would be ass. And it wouldnt be ass because of am admiral having a black blade, it would be ass because of the way it was given jackshit importance to the matter.
Only third black blade in One Piece (after only sword-god and strongest swordsman) and absolutely zero, negative hype around it. I refuse to believe it.
 
Sir Yasheen

Sir Yasheen

‎
#1,371
#1,371
DKI said:
No reason in hell Fujitora doesn't have a black blade, neither did Roger, nor Shanks, but Aramaki does. And he does while never even fighting with it.
Wtf is the point of this shit.
Aramaki's power introduction in Wano is now even worse.
If the vivre card doesn't say anything about him wielding a black black then it's not confirmed yet and I hope that it doesn't get confirmed ever cause it would be ass. And it wouldnt be ass because of am admiral having a black blade, it would be ass because of the way it was given jackshit importance to the matter.
Only third black blade in One Piece and absolutely zero, negative hype around it. I refuse to believe It.
Click to expand...
Fuji has god tier CoO, makes sense his counterpart would have god tier CoA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top