You guyz won't believe this, but the left coalition is the one who actually won the elections.

You guyz won't believe this, but Macron came from the sos-dem left (parti socialiste) and was elected by "progressive centrists" to counter the far right (his words), then said that he was neither left nor right, then said that he was a pragmatic and a rationnal, then proposed far right reforms, then after a lot of anti-social reforms he dissolved the assemblee after the win of the far right in the europpean election to get them in power and ridiculize them (it didn't work, the left won the election), then proceeded to ignore the result of the election and elected a far right prime minister

You guyz won't believe this, but this so called "unifer" prime minister was actually against the decriminalization of homosexuality in the 70's.

You guyz won't believe this, but among this "unifying" governement, there are no leftists, a majority of neo-liberals rightists (close to conservatists) close to Macron and a LOT of conservatist or far rightist/conservatist

You guyz won't believe this, but a LOT of ministers are actually against LGBTQI+ rights:
- M Bregeon sees pregnant trans men as a problem
- B. Retailleau voted AGAINST the prohibition of conversion therapies (a form torture to make a person non LGBT), he also voted against the right of abortion and an anti-trans law
- L. Garnier voted AGAINST the prohibition of conversion therapies, against same sex union, against the constitutionalization of abortion, and cosigned an anti-trans law
- P. Hetzel voted against the abortion, against MAP for all (Edit : medical assisted procreation), against same sex-union
- A. Genevard voted against the constitutionalization of abortion, against MAP for all and against same sex unions
- A Paneosyan-Bouvet is an BIG ally of OPEN anti-trans activists Marguerite Stern and Dora Moutot
- MC. Carrere-Gée voted in favor of prohibiting médical transition for minor such as gender affirmation therapies
- C. Vautrin was a big anti same sex-union activist, she voted against same sex unions
- S. Lecornu said (about same sex unions) "Gay communitarianism infuriates me as much as homophobia (...) A family is built between a man and a woman"
- R. Dati refused to vote for the interdiction of conversion therapies torture against LGBTI+
- P. Christophe voted against MAP for all
- FN. Buffet voted an anti-trans law, against MAP for all and was a big activist against the same sex unions law.
- F. Gatel voted for the prohibition of gender affirmation therapies for minor and medical transition.
- A. Canayer co signed and voted for the prohibition of medical transition for minorit and gender affirmation therapies
- O. Nasrou (minister of citizen ship and against discriminations) voted against same sex unions and was accused of buying votes during the election with food and Foot seats for PSG.
- G. Avérous was a big anti-same sex union activist and anti MAP activist. He defended homophobic rethoric.

Funny... right ?

 
Last edited:
Most of your concerns in that post are debatable (and worth concern about) but I'm going to take a guess here and say that once the whole acceptance of the LGBTQ ideology started to become fully accepted (and even trendy) in the more democractic states of the US (and even in some centrist states), the more "out of the ordinary" actions/beliefs gradually started becoming "accepted" to the main public, even if on the down low.

The "liberal" politicians whose opinions are intolerant towards the belief mentioned above? It wouldn't be the first time that politicians have had those kinds of beliefs but didn't bring outright bring them up to the public.

The MAP stuff is something that you really don't want to defend here, even if you are leaning on the left.
 
Last edited:
Most of your concerns in that post are debatable
No they are not. Those are factual datas.

but I'm going to take a guess here and say that once the whole acceptance of the LGBTQ ideology started to become fully accepted (and even trendy) in the more democractic states of the US (and even in some centrist states), the more "out of the ordinary" actions/beliefs gradually started becoming "accepted" to the main public, even if on the down low.
There is no "LGBTQI ideology". There are LGBTQI+ people that want the same human rights as other.

The MAP stuff is something that you really don't want to defend here, even if you are leaning on the left.
Actually it is. And you would be really non educated on leftist belief to think that MAP/R (Medical assisted procreation/reproduction) are not BASIC rights that leftists demands for all people who can't have children.

Those are necessary rights. Especially for same sex couple.

You are horribly misinformed
That's cute coming from you.


Several people have noted it and told you and yet you couldn't handle the criticism so you cried to the mods.
Noted what ? Their refusal of scientific data and political facts ? You do understand that I really was NEVER debunked by actual facts or scientific studies on this forum, right ?

I'm the one who providing you knowledge and valuable informations, you are the one denying it. Come back to earth mate.
:yodaswag:
 
Last edited:
@Logiko With a history of anti-lgbt beliefs mentioned in your post, it still baffles me that they somehow got elected as ministers in this "new left government".
It's not meant to be a "new left" gov, it's meant to be a unifying gov.

But this is not surprising, Macron is radicalizing toward conservatism and far right idea. He kept a minister of interior who had allegation of rape against him for 7 years. Macron is not progressive at all. Putting a far right PM and letting him nominated homophobes and transphobes is not a surprise.. but this is a scandal.
 
Actually it is. And you would be really non educated on leftist belief to think that MAP/R (Medical assisted procreation/reproduction) are BASIC rights that leftists demands for all people who can't have children.
he probably thought you were referring to “Minor Attracted People”, an alternative terminology for pedophiles
Post automatically merged:

A bunch of pro pedophile activists pushed the term MAP to de-stigmatize pedophilia.

The issue is that social stigma surrounding pedophilia is a significant barrier protecting kids from abuse.

Because pedophilia as a behavior is so heavily stigmatized, people are less likely to engage in this behavior.

Of course there are people who have pedophilic disorder, which is a mental illness where an individual has a primary attraction to prepubescent children and their arousal to children causes them significant distress and difficulties.

The problem with the MAPs approach to mental illness is that whereas sex offender treatment for people with pedophilic disorder involves helping these people form identities outside of their paraphilia, MAPs seem to do the opposite and push their identity as something to be proud of.

Of course, mental illnesses aren’t something one should take pride in. They destroy lives and we should do everything to find cures for these illnesses.
 
Last edited:

K!NG HARA$H!MA

Hustlerversity Graduate
I just find out Indonesia had to pay colonial tax to Netherlands for decades.

Other imperial states do the same.


Britain is the notable exception.

They are far better colonists and their former colonies is doing far better than others.
 
Top