I'm genuinely curious as to how the fandom feels about this, since I believe this heavily impacts the general rankings.
What brought upon this question for me is the big difference between the Zhao 3 & Qin 6. The original Zhao 3 have far better subordinate set up than the Qin 6 did, aside from Ouki having Tou. And even Ouki seemed to have only used Tou as a 5k man commander lol (which is still one of the weirdest things when you reread Bayou, his best commander spent 90% of the war chilling back with Ouki and playing yes man). Whereas on an individual basis I think the Qin 6 have the better generals. Then from the current generation, nobody sniffs Riboku's collection of underlings lol.
The argument for: Recruiting is an ability needed for leaders. Thus, a general's ability to recruit powerful underlings should be a strength for them over those who don't possess such ability. Like RSJ having the 10 heroes to make up for his flaw on the martial side.
The argument against: It's heavily luck dependent, not everyone will be put in a situation to recruit powerful underlings, thus it's not a fair thing to bring up when comparing generals.
So, should a general's underling group be counted as part of his power? Or should a general's power only be considered his abilities to the battlefield? or if you have other opinions regarding it, please state.
What brought upon this question for me is the big difference between the Zhao 3 & Qin 6. The original Zhao 3 have far better subordinate set up than the Qin 6 did, aside from Ouki having Tou. And even Ouki seemed to have only used Tou as a 5k man commander lol (which is still one of the weirdest things when you reread Bayou, his best commander spent 90% of the war chilling back with Ouki and playing yes man). Whereas on an individual basis I think the Qin 6 have the better generals. Then from the current generation, nobody sniffs Riboku's collection of underlings lol.
The argument for: Recruiting is an ability needed for leaders. Thus, a general's ability to recruit powerful underlings should be a strength for them over those who don't possess such ability. Like RSJ having the 10 heroes to make up for his flaw on the martial side.
The argument against: It's heavily luck dependent, not everyone will be put in a situation to recruit powerful underlings, thus it's not a fair thing to bring up when comparing generals.
So, should a general's underling group be counted as part of his power? Or should a general's power only be considered his abilities to the battlefield? or if you have other opinions regarding it, please state.