Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
I WAS talking about practicing with your tool of defense. How can you practice using a gun if you have no access to a gun??
The Original American Redneck™>> Brazilian Bootleg Redneck
You lack basic understanding of the political spectrum my guy. And your ass wants to HOMESCHOOL HIS KIDS WAHAHAHA🤣🤣🤣🤣🙈🙈
Whose the least? 
You lack basic understanding of the political spectrum my guy. And your ass wants to HOMESCHOOL HIS KIDS WAHAHAHA🤣🤣🤣🤣🙈🙈
Of course it does. This is what it is by defaut since the purpose it to bring a solution through more authoritarism and violence and thread or to keep an authoritative solution in place.
It's not realist, not materialist and not even scientific at all. It's purely idealistic. It's the naive belief that big gun prevent people from doing crime. Which is the most primitive and fallacious way to look at such a systemic problem. It's an easy thought idea that will not fix anything.
It's a non solution.
it's not me saying this, it's science. I provided multiple time the studies and the data to understand what I'm talking about. It's you who refuses to listen because you still have a big hard on for big weapons.
I did not say that Bear was conservative. I say that it was a conservative rethoric by defaut. And I said that it's funny when people trash me when I'm generalizing when the evidences is that you all have this type of ideaology concerning this problem.
Which is another evidences that I have no ally here.
You tell me. Training is not the only problem.
For gun violence, yes. I'm not talking about random violence. It's a scientific consensus, less gun reduce gun violence.
For other cases of violences, there are other systemic solution to create. But at least, you will reduce gun related crimes and you will help YOURSELF to arrest people more effectively.
It's also proven to be linked with Gun presence. Ergo, less gun = less gun related violence.
Again, if you are not okay with that, take that feeling to scientists, I'm only repeating their work.
Which is FALSE and was debunked pages ago in this very thread by me already. Again > Leftist Library
- [DEBUNK] - Myths about Gun violences debunked
- [SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS] - Scientists agree: Guns don't make society safer
- [ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Yes ! Gun controls do in fact have a positive effect on gun violences !
And in bonus: MORE DEBUNK
But I guess... this comment will be once again ignored, like the 1001 previous one of the same type.
Which is a common idealistic response
Instead of looking at the structural and material conditions of society that DO FACTUALLY explains why people do crimes in poor zones, you choose to blame "moral degeneracy" and thus target the minds of individuals thus completely negating the fact that those people are like you an me but in different conditions.
You are therefore blinding yourself ALONE from the material reality of the world for some mythical rethoric about individual responsibility.
It's not realist, not materialist and not even scientific at all. It's purely idealistic. It's the naive belief that big gun prevent people from doing crime. Which is the most primitive and fallacious way to look at such a systemic problem. It's an easy thought idea that will not fix anything.
It's a non solution.
it's not me saying this, it's science. I provided multiple time the studies and the data to understand what I'm talking about. It's you who refuses to listen because you still have a big hard on for big weapons.
I did not say that Bear was conservative. I say that it was a conservative rethoric by defaut. And I said that it's funny when people trash me when I'm generalizing when the evidences is that you all have this type of ideaology concerning this problem.
Which is another evidences that I have no ally here.
You tell me. Training is not the only problem.
For gun violence, yes. I'm not talking about random violence. It's a scientific consensus, less gun reduce gun violence.
For other cases of violences, there are other systemic solution to create. But at least, you will reduce gun related crimes and you will help YOURSELF to arrest people more effectively.
It's also proven to be linked with Gun presence. Ergo, less gun = less gun related violence.
Again, if you are not okay with that, take that feeling to scientists, I'm only repeating their work.
Which is FALSE and was debunked pages ago in this very thread by me already. Again > Leftist Library
- [DEBUNK] - Myths about Gun violences debunked
- [SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS] - Scientists agree: Guns don't make society safer
- [ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Yes ! Gun controls do in fact have a positive effect on gun violences !
And in bonus: MORE DEBUNK
But I guess... this comment will be once again ignored, like the 1001 previous one of the same type.
Which is a common idealistic response
Instead of looking at the structural and material conditions of society that DO FACTUALLY explains why people do crimes in poor zones, you choose to blame "moral degeneracy" and thus target the minds of individuals thus completely negating the fact that those people are like you an me but in different conditions.
You are therefore blinding yourself ALONE from the material reality of the world for some mythical rethoric about individual responsibility.
1-Dry firing. You can learn the basics using an airsoft gun. Firing the damn thing is the least important aspect. You don't even need a replica or airsoft for tatical training.
2-You can hire people to do the homeschooling for you.
3-Political spectrum is BULLSHIT.There is no such thing as center.Center=apolitical people.
Of course, lets label 99.9% of poor people as possible criminals cause 0.1% of them commit crimes. Do you realize how prejudiced your statement is?
2-You can hire people to do the homeschooling for you.
3-Political spectrum is BULLSHIT.There is no such thing as center.Center=apolitical people.
Post automatically merged:
Of course, lets label 99.9% of poor people as possible criminals cause 0.1% of them commit crimes. Do you realize how prejudiced your statement is?
More guns means more effective street protests. Who needs burning cars when we can have d***e*** ****** ****** and **** ********** ************** then ***** ************ ******* while ****** *u******** **** ***** ******* to **** ******* ***** **** **** ******* ************ f*ck ******* ******** and ****** *********** *********** ******** ********. Do you understand?
Why do you feel the need to resort to s*xual accusations?
The problem is solved if the government providing access to training and practice classes.
Do you recognize that disarmament is a defining trai of colonizers and imperial governments?
The violence will shift, we have already established this 4 pages ago. Banning one tool that can be abused to commit crimes does nothing to reduce the underlying problems in society
.
Calling for 'the system' to fix everything is denying adult citizens the right to be adult citizens. You want 'the system' to baby grown adults.
Why do you feel the need to resort to s*xual accusations?
The problem is solved if the government providing access to training and practice classes.
Do you recognize that disarmament is a defining trai of colonizers and imperial governments?
The violence will shift, we have already established this 4 pages ago. Banning one tool that can be abused to commit crimes does nothing to reduce the underlying problems in society
.
Calling for 'the system' to fix everything is denying adult citizens the right to be adult citizens. You want 'the system' to baby grown adults.
This is a common expression to signify that you like big guns. It's not sexual.
This will not help the bigger problem. There are a lot more issues related to gun ownership or the presence of guns.
Yes, in condition of colonization. Not when we are trying to prevent violences and death inside a country.
No it will not. The idea that people will do crime either way is false.
It's possible in the most severe cases, but most of the time, not having access to gun will deter people to do crime in the first place.
So you still refuse to understand that humans are structured by the systems and not by individual behaviors ?
I can't help you understand that aside from telling you to go read some stuff about materialism. We are not babies, we are human meaning animals that repond to our environment.
No matter if you are an adult or a baby, if you have been raised under fascism and never had any counter thoughts, you will become a fascist.
It's time to accept the material reality of the world and stop trying to hold to the myth that your thoughts will resolve systemic problems.
This will not help the bigger problem. There are a lot more issues related to gun ownership or the presence of guns.
Yes, in condition of colonization. Not when we are trying to prevent violences and death inside a country.
No it will not. The idea that people will do crime either way is false.
It's possible in the most severe cases, but most of the time, not having access to gun will deter people to do crime in the first place.
So you still refuse to understand that humans are structured by the systems and not by individual behaviors ?
I can't help you understand that aside from telling you to go read some stuff about materialism. We are not babies, we are human meaning animals that repond to our environment.
No matter if you are an adult or a baby, if you have been raised under fascism and never had any counter thoughts, you will become a fascist.
It's time to accept the material reality of the world and stop trying to hold to the myth that your thoughts will resolve systemic problems.
But banning everything solves social problems? 
Sorry fluffy. You are the blind one here. Not me.
My vision is based on data and facts. Not simple afterthoughts.
Indeed. When I'm talking about the system, I'm not necessarily refering to the gov.
You seems to think that because I want to push the system to change people, then I'm treating adults like kids.
So yes, it's pertinent to answer this assertion.
