Of course it does. This is what it is by defaut since the purpose it to bring a solution through more authoritarism and violence and thread or to keep an authoritative solution in place.
It's not realist, not materialist and not even scientific at all.
It's purely idealistic. It's the naive belief that big gun prevent people from doing crime. Which is the most primitive and fallacious way to look at such a systemic problem. It's an easy thought idea that will not fix anything.
It's a non solution.
it's not me saying this, it's science. I provided multiple time the studies and the data to understand what I'm talking about. It's you who refuses to listen because you still have a big hard on for big weapons.
I did not say that Bear was conservative. I say that it was a conservative rethoric by defaut. And I said that it's funny when people trash me when I'm generalizing when the evidences is that you all have this type of ideaology concerning this problem.
Which is another evidences that I have no ally here.
You tell me. Training is not the only problem.
For gun violence, yes. I'm not talking about random violence. It's a scientific consensus, less gun reduce gun violence.
For other cases of violences, there are other systemic solution to create. But at least, you will reduce gun related crimes and you will help YOURSELF to arrest people more effectively.
It's also proven to be linked with Gun presence. Ergo, less gun = less gun related violence.
Again, if you are not okay with that, take that feeling to scientists, I'm only repeating their work.
Which is
FALSE and was debunked pages agos in this very thread by me already. Again >
Leftist Library
- [DEBUNK] - Myths about Gun violences debunked
- [SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS] - Scientists agree: Guns don't make society safer
- [ARTICLE AND STUDIES] - Yes ! Gun controls do in fact have a positive effect on gun violences !
And in bonus:
MORE DEBUNK
But I guess... this comment will be once again ignored, like the 1001 previous one of the same type.
Which is a common idealistic response
Instead of looking at the structural and material conditions of society that DO FACTUALLY explains why people do crimes in poor zones, you choose to blame "moral degeneracy" and thus target the minds of individuals thus completely negating the fact that those people are like you an me but in different conditions.
You are therefore blinding yourself ALONE from the material reality of the world for some mythical rethoric about individual responsibility.