Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine #votebluenomatterwhat are you having fun al? are you having van al? gaolang > your fav i refuse to pay my taxes imagine thinking trump is the good guy is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? it's over for trump life goal sister harem loli mfw kamala harris can actually win real madrid tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you worst thread ever
Because you don't take into account the fact that people are not trained and that the fact of having a Gun alone in your hand increase the chances for violence and panic to happen. Without counting the rate of the accident.
More gun do not reduce crime. It only create more chance for violence ... and more weapon on the market. It simply a bad solution.
If you don't like science, don't be surprised to be called anti-scientific.
Which, as I said, is fallacious.
Less gun means less gun violences and therefore stopping other weapon is a lot more easy. Thinking that it's authoritarian to want to stop people from having dangerous weapon is the peak of fallaciousness. It's also wrong on all levels.
Less gun means less gun violence. More gun do not reduce crime but only helps violence to spread.
If you are more afraid of a baseball bat than a gun, maybe ask yourself two or three questions.
Stop comparing a reform for less violence with a colonization process please.
Which is true.
Again, if you are as afraid of a gun than you are of a knife, there are questions to ask yourself.
It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread
Take a good look
More gun do not reduce crime. It only create more chance for violence ... and more weapon on the market. It simply a bad solution.
If you don't like science, don't be surprised to be called anti-scientific.
Which, as I said, is fallacious.
Less gun means less gun violences and therefore stopping other weapon is a lot more easy. Thinking that it's authoritarian to want to stop people from having dangerous weapon is the peak of fallaciousness. It's also wrong on all levels.
Less gun means less gun violence. More gun do not reduce crime but only helps violence to spread.
If you are more afraid of a baseball bat than a gun, maybe ask yourself two or three questions.
Stop comparing a reform for less violence with a colonization process please.
Which is true.
Again, if you are as afraid of a gun than you are of a knife, there are questions to ask yourself.
It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread
Take a good look
And this is the single most dumbest argument they keep bringing up. To try to convince people that self defense is in fact DANGEROUS and nit defending oneself keeps you safe. Not only does it treat people like toddlers but it assumes that training and practice are foe some reason not possible.
Yea but you are a conservative
Yea but you are a conservative
I am a conservative, true. Nothing wrong with that. Holding a conservative perspective does not mean I ascribe to all conservative beliefs, mind you.
I said the above in defence of you - because you most certainly aren't, but Logiko was painting you with that brush by saying: "It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread."
I said the above in defence of you - because you most certainly aren't, but Logiko was painting you with that brush by saying: "It's funny, all you guys are in synch with this conservative rethoric and yet, you don't understand why i'm generalizing the ideologies on this thread."
"Less guns=less violence" is very fallacious and blatantly untrue. In America, there is more gun violence in anti-gun states than there are in pro gun, open carry states.
Gun violence is proven to be linked with culture and poverty and whaddaya know? The states with the most gun violence are the Democrat anti-gun ones, which high poverty rates. High poverty also equates to more crime.
Whaaa??? You mean it's pretty complicated and complex and not simple????
Gun violence is proven to be linked with culture and poverty and whaddaya know? The states with the most gun violence are the Democrat anti-gun ones, which high poverty rates. High poverty also equates to more crime.
Whaaa??? You mean it's pretty complicated and complex and not simple????
I feel sorry for your kids
People like you prove that homeschooling is a bad idea
Says the guy who gave me
and 
emotes when I predicted the escalation of wars some years ago and went silent when I was proven right
People like you prove that homeschooling is a bad idea
Says the guy who gave me
and emotes when I predicted the escalation of wars some years ago and went silent when I was proven right
Post automatically merged:
I don't think that equating poverty with crime is true. There a lot of peaceful places that are very poor. I think moral degeneracy is to be blamed.
So it depends on the target audience and the genre(whether it's a documentary or entertainment)? Does the presentation also matter. I mean there are channels that focus solely on historical battles for example.
And what about the comment sections? I saw people discuss this and some said that the video creator gets less money the more non-family friendly words are used in the comment section. Viewers speeding up the video also gets the created less money. Is this true?
Depends on the country.
And what about the comment sections? I saw people discuss this and some said that the video creator gets less money the more non-family friendly words are used in the comment section. Viewers speeding up the video also gets the created less money. Is this true?
Depends on the country.