There's undoubtedly no place for corruption in the beta realm
Post automatically merged:
Dodging the question once more Zara, why?
[FNZ] Light game Naruto Chunin Exams Filler Game
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Status
What do you have to say about what I have pointed out about your activity? (don't mind the quote inside quote lol, you definitely have 4 mechanical posts out of your "supposed" 10)
Dodging the question once more Zara, why?
Dodging the question once more Zara, why?
Z
What question specifically would you like answered? The what have I contributed to town one? Nobody had contributed anything on Day 1.
No reason given?
There was 10 posts about how beta omgussing people is what he does when hes town.
And ive quoted mel multiple times and made it clear i dont trust her even before voting beta.
Post automatically merged:
No reason given?
There was 10 posts about how beta omgussing people is what he does when hes town.
And ive quoted mel multiple times and made it clear i dont trust her even before voting beta.
Honestly I didn't even count how many posts I had posted yesterday accurately if I have to be transparent, but I felt to be fairly active overall, way more than most players. Definitely to have posted more than 4.
I have a life too, even bots sustain university exams, and I sorrowfully couldn't be posting like a machine my dear.
My activity rates are very varied game from game not to mention, it is not really a valid meta point. My meta is never easy to discern I have to say. It is entirely up to your skill.
I have a life too, even bots sustain university exams, and I sorrowfully couldn't be posting like a machine my dear.
My activity rates are very varied game from game not to mention, it is not really a valid meta point. My meta is never easy to discern I have to say. It is entirely up to your skill.
But that the safest escape route to avoid the suspicion. It's like I am watching Death Note in your argument. Kira is that you? LOL. Putting your name in the list of potential goons won't help you clear out your name but even more drew the suspicion towards you. But I see where you're coming from.
Change Vote Lynch Zara
Change Vote Lynch Zara
Unvote @AL sama
@Zara You didn’t want a lynch on D1 at the beginning, but you then advocated for Final’s lynch and are now going after Melon. This scattershot approach seems really scummy in the wake of not wanting to lynch anyone. Skimming through your posts, you have yet to explain any of these decisions in a satisfactory way; you mentioned sussing Melon once before shifting focus to her, and you didn’t say why in any of your posts.
Vote Lynch Zara @AL sama
@Zara You didn’t want a lynch on D1 at the beginning, but you then advocated for Final’s lynch and are now going after Melon. This scattershot approach seems really scummy in the wake of not wanting to lynch anyone. Skimming through your posts, you have yet to explain any of these decisions in a satisfactory way; you mentioned sussing Melon once before shifting focus to her, and you didn’t say why in any of your posts.
Vote Lynch Zara @AL sama
Z
So then why you still got your vote on beta, mr fishy? 
i dont want to die, and i was under the impression neither of them want to die either, hence my original suggestion to all go for you
unfortunately beta only acknowledges people who vote for him, something ill keep in mind for future games
which leaves gambit, who im waiting for to switch
unless youre asking why i dont swtich on my own? That’s silly, that would remove beta from the rng lynch and make my odds of getting lynch rise from 33.33% to 50%.
Zara, the reason I am placing my vote on you was because of your savage attempt to channel all the votes to our accuser and that's pretty scummy in general. I understand that he has his reason why he suspects me and albeit shallow like the waters falling down on the kitchen sink, he still has his reason. And I don't wanna repeat all over again to say that there are factors why I wasn't that participative yesterday. People don't care about these reasons for mine but it's true and I also don't care if they don't care. Demo, I won't be voting for him just because he voted for me, and I tried to analyze the situation because most of the time, true colors of people will come out before dusk and you just blatantly outed yourself by encouraging us to shift votes.
I have said I can't read your meta, so I'll ignore it for now.
If we are going to basic mafia hunting, and forgetting the 4 mechanical posts and early game posts, you still only had 2 posts out of all of the posts you wrote on your suspicion, which was on Zara.
Ok I can't lie that's smart lmao
If we are going to basic mafia hunting, and forgetting the 4 mechanical posts and early game posts, you still only had 2 posts out of all of the posts you wrote on your suspicion, which was on Zara.
unless youre asking why i dont swtich on my own? That’s silly, that would remove beta from the rng lynch and make my odds of getting lynch rise from 33.33% to 50%.
This is what I said about Gambit.
I could have kept it discreet and to myself but instead of doing that I openly stated a possibility because I have worked with al as a host. I placed five names and not one.
Using such tactic isn't good but it's not bad either because it gives reactions.
And, it's not Just that I specifically pin pointed gambit. I did with tac as well but I didn't raise any sus on tac. Did I?
I called him a probable candidate because he is most experienced. Key word here is "probable" . There was nothing definite.
I followed this by asking him to give his Reads (in above post itself)
He replied but didn't give any Reads.
Now this is the post when I exactly raised sus on him. Look at the reason. I asked for his reads again.
And, he replied with over reaction and completely fixated at my tactic of al as if I struck some nerve.
And,it was followed with him getting heated and throwing shades at me and neutral.
So when exactly I sussed him based on al?
You people Never used such tactics to fish reactions then it's not my fault.
@Seraphoenix now answer me. Why you so eager to defend gambit?
Do you know something which we don't?
I could have kept it discreet and to myself but instead of doing that I openly stated a possibility because I have worked with al as a host. I placed five names and not one.
Using such tactic isn't good but it's not bad either because it gives reactions.
And, it's not Just that I specifically pin pointed gambit. I did with tac as well but I didn't raise any sus on tac. Did I?
I called him a probable candidate because he is most experienced. Key word here is "probable" . There was nothing definite.
I followed this by asking him to give his Reads (in above post itself)
He replied but didn't give any Reads.
Now this is the post when I exactly raised sus on him. Look at the reason. I asked for his reads again.
And, he replied with over reaction and completely fixated at my tactic of al as if I struck some nerve.
And,it was followed with him getting heated and throwing shades at me and neutral.
So when exactly I sussed him based on al?
You people Never used such tactics to fish reactions then it's not my fault.
@Seraphoenix now answer me. Why you so eager to defend gambit?
Do you know something which we don't?
Z
No offen but this is a dishonest summary of events. And a bit hypocritical.
I suggested a no lynch, multiple people explained why it’s a bad idea. Moved on to something else.
Found Beta only focusing on TAC weird due to TAC. Multiple people said it’s his playstyle. Moved on to something else.
When new information gets revealed, you adapt and move on. Not tunnel and obsess with them all game.
Which brings us to the hypocritical part, when I thought your comment about me and TAC was weird, and you explained yourself, and I found your explanation satisfactory and moved on, you didn’t accuse my approach of being scattershot then.
Also i did say why i sussed mel multiple times
I suggested a no lynch, multiple people explained why it’s a bad idea. Moved on to something else.
Found Beta only focusing on TAC weird due to TAC. Multiple people said it’s his playstyle. Moved on to something else.
When new information gets revealed, you adapt and move on. Not tunnel and obsess with them all game.
Which brings us to the hypocritical part, when I thought your comment about me and TAC was weird, and you explained yourself, and I found your explanation satisfactory and moved on, you didn’t accuse my approach of being scattershot then.
Post automatically merged:
Also i did say why i sussed mel multiple times
How is it dishonest? All of your posts have followed this through line - you were on about not lynching D1, then you were hard on Final, then suddenly shifted to Melon. You can paint it however you want, but that’s how it went. I’m on my phone and working so I’m not gonna quote every post, but I read them all and saw no consistency between your reads.
Also, telling people to pool votes together against a single person instead of letting players come to that conclusion by reading the thread feels extremely scummy, there’s a reason why people sus me for my mistake but are actively voting for you doing shit like that. You’re trying to turn public opinion against someone and have yet to explain WHY you find her worthy of being lynched.
Also, telling people to pool votes together against a single person instead of letting players come to that conclusion by reading the thread feels extremely scummy, there’s a reason why people sus me for my mistake but are actively voting for you doing shit like that. You’re trying to turn public opinion against someone and have yet to explain WHY you find her worthy of being lynched.
Gambit seemed like an angry townie. I'm suspending judgement on Reborn. I'll first see whether he gets anywhere with his questioning.
Therapy?
I'll keep the quote for when you fall 
It's baseless. Though at this point it's also pointless to argue about it over and over. We'll see when mafia is outed whether you have a point here.
Therapy?
I'll keep the quote for when you fall It's baseless. Though at this point it's also pointless to argue about it over and over. We'll see when mafia is outed whether you have a point here.
Fair enough but still I don't agree with the mentality of handpicking roles. You should never compare the game you hosted with Al before because this is a totally different one. Nonetheless, that's where you commence your play against me and I am conscious that you were only trying to get my reaction which I did. Was it on purpose? Perhaps not because this is the way I speak and this should not be considered as AI. I don't have meta and my play varies from one game to the other regardless of the role. If you think that I over-react maybe because I might have scrutinized your assumption of the mechanic. And yes, I somewhat suspect you for the reason I am guilty of - I don't like people accusing me in general when I haven't said anything yet and it will get to my nerves.
- Status