@Zemmi Here is a tweet that sums up quite well why you should ask serious questions about Elon Musk around Donald Trump:
My point is not that you intentionnaly supports them, it's that you work in their interest.
You, yourself (but others too) have told me repeatifively how some very problematic behavior didn't deserve any sanction or have clearly targeted my labelling method as toxic when it's not, forcing me to censor myself in order to not get ban over something that is the legitimate and ethical thing to do as I explained in the moderation thread.
So yes. You are working for THEIR interests and in the interest of the status co. Politically it's exactly what happens to leftists against the fliberals when they try to fight the far right. Their radicality, because it threatens the status co and the interests of people in power, is labelled as toxic and problematic and in some case, they are forced to become part of the system.
Perhaps, but I didn't miss all the times when my radicality was targeted.
The fact that you attack my arrogance, which is a facade that I use to fight masses of people in equal footing here, why not, it's part of the game, I know that I'm hostile territory, it's ok. My arguments and radicality on the other hand ? Nah.. this is different, it has nothing to do with rationnality.
The simple example being meritocracy. What I give in this forum about the subject is all about and ONLY what researchers and sociologists have explained. And yet... I keep receiving things like "you invent your own words to twist reality".
Those kind of things are not you showing me criticizing my behavior, it's you criticizing the value. The value of leftism, mostly radical in that case.
My point exactly.
My method is radical leftism. An offensive version of it as I search to convince and fight and not simply educate.
THIS is what you do not accept as leftism.
Those were authoritarians. It's not radical leftists.
No you don't.
If that was the case you would accept the fact that portugese people genocided the people who were residing on the territory that is Brazil now, during the "new world" conquest.
This is an historical fact supported by real researches that you clearly denied.
