Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Naah denying evolution is the wise thing to do, I already explained everything and everything that you got is: millions of years has to pass to make evolution real, also there's no evidence for evolution, just believe that yours ancestor is a rat. You can believe that yours ancestors was dogs or what so ever you want. You are stupid and I'm not.
Also speaking about God, actually science already come to conclusion that God created this universe. Let me show you this:
Big Bang theory - universe began with every speck of energy jammed into very tiny point, while then this energy exploded with unimagine force.
Now the question is where this energy comes from? Why it exploded.
And if you think about it God is actually source of this unimagible force and energy. E = mc2 - you know this formule right? I mean you should learn it in school. So God beign source of this infinite energy used it to create matter.
As you can see there are nothing common in believing God and believing in flat earth. So stop mocking me, trying to show that you are right, when you are totally wrong, and stupid. Just be a man you used to be and stop making me laugh from yours ignorance.
[automerge]1731806169[/automerge]
There's no way to show you how hair grew on neanderthals skin. Check the grave of yours ancestors - there's no hair on skeleton left :D
Also speaking about God, actually science already come to conclusion that God created this universe. Let me show you this:
Big Bang theory - universe began with every speck of energy jammed into very tiny point, while then this energy exploded with unimagine force.
Now the question is where this energy comes from? Why it exploded.
And if you think about it God is actually source of this unimagible force and energy. E = mc2 - you know this formule right? I mean you should learn it in school. So God beign source of this infinite energy used it to create matter.
As you can see there are nothing common in believing God and believing in flat earth. So stop mocking me, trying to show that you are right, when you are totally wrong, and stupid. Just be a man you used to be and stop making me laugh from yours ignorance.
[automerge]1731806169[/automerge]
There's no way to show you how hair grew on neanderthals skin. Check the grave of yours ancestors - there's no hair on skeleton left :D
Ok evolution isnt the only thing you dont actually know shit about lmao.
[automerge]1731826567[/automerge]
Yeah this individual is getting this information exclusively from creationists it seems.
[automerge]1731826691[/automerge]
Thats not what i said.
I said not accepting evolution is on the same level as believing in flat earth.
[automerge]1731826567[/automerge]
Yeah this individual is getting this information exclusively from creationists it seems.
[automerge]1731826691[/automerge]
Thats not what i said.
I said not accepting evolution is on the same level as believing in flat earth.
About the antifascist part, I think you could also like capitalism, especially if you don't know very much about political theory, so it's not like you thibk exploitation of the workers is good, and hate fascism,
[automerge]1731836106[/automerge]
Actually it seems this video is pretty relevant, @Brush D. Teeth to what you said about fascism and communism being the politics of 1945,
[automerge]1731836398[/automerge]
And I think a problem with evolution is trying to impose a materialistic worldview, and tresting it as an absolute instead of as a science, I can study it freely and I have no issue with it, please study it and learn more about it, but I do not have a purely materialist worldview and I don't think that that's what evolution shows,
Last edited:
Hey @Uncle Van , I think you mentioned once that the issue with the capitalism that was in Marxs time was that it was very unfair, but I was reading a writing written by Harry Baldwin that talked about that for a bit, and I would like to share it and please let me know what you think about it if you want to read it:
"
Another of Carmichael’s claims against Marx is that increasing misery has failed to materialise but that rather the opposite has happened.
Most people have learned to live with so many affronts to their humanity that they fail to realise the abject misery with which capitalism surrounds them. Vast stockpiles of hydrogen bombs, hundreds of thousands of children dying from starvation while crops are destroyed, millions in the world’s richest countries living in squalid, rat-infested slums.
Marx’s illustration in which he compares houses in a neighbourhood and the changed attitude when a palace arises beside them shows that he regarded poverty as relative. It is the ever-growing disproportion between socially potential abundance and actual deprivation against which increasing misery must be understood. That capitalism has disastrously failed to harness its immense industrial and scientific resources for the benefit of all mankind, or to any end other than the quest for profits, must be obvious to any objective observer."
https://www.marxists.org/archive/baldwin-harry/1969/howfoolishindeed.htm
"
Another of Carmichael’s claims against Marx is that increasing misery has failed to materialise but that rather the opposite has happened.
Most people have learned to live with so many affronts to their humanity that they fail to realise the abject misery with which capitalism surrounds them. Vast stockpiles of hydrogen bombs, hundreds of thousands of children dying from starvation while crops are destroyed, millions in the world’s richest countries living in squalid, rat-infested slums.
Marx’s illustration in which he compares houses in a neighbourhood and the changed attitude when a palace arises beside them shows that he regarded poverty as relative. It is the ever-growing disproportion between socially potential abundance and actual deprivation against which increasing misery must be understood. That capitalism has disastrously failed to harness its immense industrial and scientific resources for the benefit of all mankind, or to any end other than the quest for profits, must be obvious to any objective observer."
https://www.marxists.org/archive/baldwin-harry/1969/howfoolishindeed.htm
They are fucked already by big pharma,why would a guy who wants to point fingers at them for their malpractices bad for them ?
The guy just wants for them aside from regulations to have long term studies ,hardly a bad thing to do.
If anything the department of agriculture should follow suit but I doubt he (whoever ends up becoming the head)would put regulations on farmers regarding what pesticides they use or the injections on herdables .
Soda-makers is another different chapter altogether.
The guy just wants for them aside from regulations to have long term studies ,hardly a bad thing to do.
If anything the department of agriculture should follow suit but I doubt he (whoever ends up becoming the head)would put regulations on farmers regarding what pesticides they use or the injections on herdables .
Soda-makers is another different chapter altogether.