Controversial Influencers have more influence than actors/popstars?

Who is better for society?

  • Total voters
    19
K!NG HARA$H!MA

K!NG HARA$H!MA

Hustlerversity Graduate
‎
#1
#1
In recent years, we've seen the rise e-celebs or Influencers


In recent US elections, Kamala still lost despite prominent actors and popstars like avengers and Taylor/Billie Eilish endorsements

Joe Rogan endorsing Trump is vital one and he was able to get many people vote for trump


This isn't necessarily a political thread but just an example.


Ofc another popular influencers include the likes Tate etc


It's seems like actors and popstars no longer have the influence they once had, and these influencers have surpassed them in many cases


Is this a good thing?
 
NAMELESS

NAMELESS

‎
#2
#2
K!NG HARA$H!MA said:
In recent years, we've seen the rise e-celebs or Influencers


In recent US elections, Kamala still lost despite prominent actors and popstars like avengers and Taylor/Billie Eilish endorsements

Joe Rogan endorsing Trump is vital one and he was able to get many people vote for trump


This isn't necessarily a political thread but just an example.


Ofc another popular influencers include the likes Tate etc


It's seems like actors and popstars no longer have the influence they once had, and these influencers have surpassed them in many cases


Is this a good thing?
Click to expand...
TV and hollywood doesn't have the glamour it once had. Also, influencers interact with their fans 24/7, so there is that too.
Post automatically merged:

K!NG HARA$H!MA said:
In recent years, we've seen the rise e-celebs or Influencers


In recent US elections, Kamala still lost despite prominent actors and popstars like avengers and Taylor/Billie Eilish endorsements

Joe Rogan endorsing Trump is vital one and he was able to get many people vote for trump


This isn't necessarily a political thread but just an example.


Ofc another popular influencers include the likes Tate etc


It's seems like actors and popstars no longer have the influence they once had, and these influencers have surpassed them in many cases


Is this a good thing?
Click to expand...
I think its a good thing. Anyone can be an e celebrity. It makes things more democratic.
 
Last edited:
Reborn

Reborn

Throughout Heaven & Earth,I alone am d Honored One
‎
#7
#7
K!NG HARA$H!MA said:
In recent years, we've seen the rise e-celebs or Influencers
Inrecent US elections, Kamala still lost despite prominent actors and popstars like avengers and Taylor/Billie Eilish endorsements
Joe Rogan endorsing Trump is vital one and he was able to get many people vote for trump
This isn't necessarily a political thread but just an example.

Ofc another popular influencers include the likes Tate etc
It's seems like actors and popstars no longer have the influence they once had, and these influencers have surpassed them in many cases
Is this a good thing?
Click to expand...
It's interesting to note that two examples of influencers you mentioned - JR and Tate - both are bald
 
ShinichiMugi

ShinichiMugi

‎
#17
#17
Yes its true. Influencers/Tiktokers etc. are the new celebrities. Kids nowadays dont grow up with television or cinema like us millenials,but grow up with Tiktok shorts or Twitch livestreams.
Of course Hollywood can still give popularity,but it has way less power. There are new celebrities like Sydney Sweeney or Jacob Elordi but they have to share space with Influencers,and often lose against them.
Is this a good thing? Well,it depends! Influencers have more space for freedom of speech for sure,but they can be stupid so their "speech" is not a "quality speech",or they can still be corrupted with sponsorizations etc. so it doesnt probably change too much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top