Controversial Pot Goblin and Bepo Trial: Guilty on all charges!
- Thread starter Mr. Reloaded
- Start date
- Tags h-help us pero-kun.. ~giselle hime and pero are frauds hime is a lier hime is a truther like minamoto i am bepo and i killed zepo i am bepo and i own a massive bepo fur suit i am pero and i love lola the bunny garchu! i am pot goblin and i own a carrot body pillow i am reborn and i cosplay bepo to have hair i am reloaded and i own an even bigger fursuit pero bottom 1 pero deserved it pero is evil pero top 1 pero wrote these playa was here these quaxlys deserved to live!! tkots top 1 tyki_mikk and playa are the same person
This is the most sensible post I have seen from you 
Post automatically merged:
I maintain that @Peroroncino deserved it.
i mean look at his signature, it's literally Satan, he's obviously evil and cruel to his Pokemon. He's also been involved in numerous crimes, ranging from jaywalking, slowpoke tail selling, mailbox tampering, Elden Ring build shaming, ignoring my tags, and even working with the IRS and DEA
Please tell us about any and all grievances you faced with @Peroroncino as well as any details regarding his Pokemon abuse
I noticed that you already made a post regarding this, but I want to give you more of the floor.
Please tell us about any and all grievances you faced with @Peroroncino as well as any details regarding his Pokemon abuse
Please tell us about any and all grievances you faced with @Peroroncino as well as any details regarding his Pokemon abuse
Since then he's polluted every thread and server with terrible takes and even polluted my fish bowl and lakes. Now, he's joined a cult of blood led by the figure in his signature just because one member was cool and polite. I'm not really sure what they do but even i know a blood cult probably does bad stuff
I could go on and on if I didn't have the memory of a goldfi-
Morphine is a narcotic, it's really hard to get even If I was involved, you better smoke whatever Kekaro is smoking, guarantee it's easier to obtain too XD I would like Ms. Hime to refrain from emotinally and mentally torturing you for the sake of winning over the prosecution as it would only mean I will have to go to jail and treat you there, something I do not like at all, since I will be meeting @LANJI CUCKSMOKE for being a LBJ fan in 2025
You do like involving yourself in other's businesses, even if you have no interest in them, just to corrupt.
I saw that when you wanted Machi avatar, when you didn't even knew her name, saying "Give me the Bogard girl" implying the only reason you took her as pfp is for you to drain whatever's left of @Bogard sanity when he inevitably sees your profile.
@Reborn please take this into consideration, shit just went to national (worstgen-admin) security threat level
I saw that when you wanted Machi avatar, when you didn't even knew her name, saying "Give me the Bogard girl" implying the only reason you took her as pfp is for you to drain whatever's left of @Bogard sanity when he inevitably sees your profile.
@Reborn please take this into consideration, shit just went to national (worstgen-admin) security threat level
Sorry your honor I was dealing with fujishiro’s recurrent hemorrhoids problem 
I take good care of my patients and focus on having good Doctor-patient relationship, but me being “emotional” and “poetic” has nothing to do with Mr. Goblin’s case in question specifically, I’m generally a well-manner person who sympathizes with humane causes whenever possible. A PTSD patient who was very stressed to the point his ass cheek was out of my luxury sofa is something to be compassionate about … one does not simply floats half his bottom out if not in severe stress, no?
Although breaking down in tears may be within the range of dramatization, However, In this particular case, I tend to think it was genuine and as a direct result of PTSD, As for the independent specialist you asked about, If you have read the paper Ms. Hime provided (which was done by me) I clearly say that I‘m ”re—evaluating” Mr. Goblin’s case and that I’m “in agreement “ with his previous diagnosis of PTSD, I’m in fact the 2nd opinion that confirms the diagnosis that was previously made by the general practitioner, so with that in mind, this PTSD diagnosis and overall evaluation was made by 2 doctors, me being the 2nd one and fitting the Independent description you asked for.
Tbh, we are currently having budget issues with our legal documentation system, it’s an irrelevant matter but had to be mentioned as the questioning was heading its way. It’s a nation wide problem as the tariffs had limited both our software and hardware imports from china and Taiwan thus we had to use whatever was available at the time to get things going, patients can’t afford to wait for luxury measures that could potentially stagnate the healthcare system. However, I’m no expert in this field and you could probably ask our Tech team lead Mr. @EkkoLoJinx
Oh yes! It’s called systemic desensitization! It’s a very known way to relieve anxiety and emotional stress with roots that extends back to 1960s! As for the in house documentation part, as I mentioned earlier, we had some technical difficulties that were out of our control … as for the peer-revision part you can check it out here
There is no way something is with 100% certainty in psychiatry but given the before mentioned points and events, I can say it’s highly likely that Mr. Goblin’s actions were influenced by his PTSD condition.
I take good care of my patients and focus on having good Doctor-patient relationship, but me being “emotional” and “poetic” has nothing to do with Mr. Goblin’s case in question specifically, I’m generally a well-manner person who sympathizes with humane causes whenever possible. A PTSD patient who was very stressed to the point his ass cheek was out of my luxury sofa is something to be compassionate about … one does not simply floats half his bottom out if not in severe stress, no?
Although breaking down in tears may be within the range of dramatization, However, In this particular case, I tend to think it was genuine and as a direct result of PTSD, As for the independent specialist you asked about, If you have read the paper Ms. Hime provided (which was done by me) I clearly say that I‘m ”re—evaluating” Mr. Goblin’s case and that I’m “in agreement “ with his previous diagnosis of PTSD, I’m in fact the 2nd opinion that confirms the diagnosis that was previously made by the general practitioner, so with that in mind, this PTSD diagnosis and overall evaluation was made by 2 doctors, me being the 2nd one and fitting the Independent description you asked for.
Tbh, we are currently having budget issues with our legal documentation system, it’s an irrelevant matter but had to be mentioned as the questioning was heading its way. It’s a nation wide problem as the tariffs had limited both our software and hardware imports from china and Taiwan thus we had to use whatever was available at the time to get things going, patients can’t afford to wait for luxury measures that could potentially stagnate the healthcare system. However, I’m no expert in this field and you could probably ask our Tech team lead Mr. @EkkoLoJinx
Oh yes! It’s called systemic desensitization! It’s a very known way to relieve anxiety and emotional stress with roots that extends back to 1960s! As for the in house documentation part, as I mentioned earlier, we had some technical difficulties that were out of our control … as for the peer-revision part you can check it out here
There is no way something is with 100% certainty in psychiatry but given the before mentioned points and events, I can say it’s highly likely that Mr. Goblin’s actions were influenced by his PTSD condition.
@Yoho
@Jaguark101
@Kerkovian
@Devilbat
@CoC: Color of Clowns
@Pot Goblin @Bepo D. Bear @Mr. Reloaded
@TheKnightOfTheSea
@Ali v2
@AL sama
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
While we respect the witness’s theatrical bedside manner and heartfelt concern for sofa logistics, the Prosecution must now address the glaring inconsistencies and convenient loopholes in his testimony.
1. Emotional Bias Over Clinical Neutrality
The witness proudly admits to being “poetic” and “emotional” when treating patients. While charming, this compromises his objectivity. Psychiatry is a science—not a platform for literary flair. Diagnoses must be made from data, not from half an ass cheek.
2. Confirmation Bias in Diagnosis
He claims to be the “second opinion” supporting a PTSD diagnosis. Yet, we have not been presented with the first opinion, nor has the court been given any verifiable documentation of the initial diagnosis, practitioner identity, or medical process. In legal terms: this is hearsay stacked on top of self-validation.
3. Comedy Trial Evidence
The defense leans heavily on a document first presented during a comedy trial. The witness excuses this by referencing "budget issues" and "Chinese tariffs"—irrelevant to the authenticity of a clinical report. If you can’t distinguish courtroom satire from medical testimony, how can we trust your assessment of psychological trauma?
4. Selective Citation Without Application
While systemic desensitization is a real technique, the witness failed to provide any logs, notes, or clinical charts showing its use on Mr. Goblin. Quoting PubMed does not equate to applying its methods. As of now, the entire process sounds improvised and undocumented.
5. Weak Causal Link to Criminal Behavior
Finally, the doctor admits he cannot be certain that PTSD caused Mr. Goblin’s actions. This makes his testimony speculative at best, and inadmissible at worst. Psychiatry does not function on “maybe.” The burden of proof here lies not in compassion, but in concrete correlation between diagnosis and the accused’s behavior.
We ask the court to treat this testimony not as medical fact, but as theatrical mitigation disguised as expert analysis. Compassion does not substitute due process.
First Part
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
Before we allow emotional anecdotes or inebriated distractions to obscure the truth, the defense would like to clarify a few critical matters regarding both the credibility of @hime and the alleged victimhood of @Bepo D. Bear.
I. The Case of Bepo D. Bear – A Habitual Violator of Pokémon Ethics
While the prosecution attempts to paint @Bepo D. Bear as some elusive, misunderstood figure, the facts show otherwise. Let us review:
- Tampering and Hacking: The evidence presented from the PKHeX interface clearly shows manipulated stats, illegal Pokémon creation, and falsified in-game records. This isn't speculation — it's irrefutable digital proof. Any seasoned trainer will confirm:
- Maxed BP and coins,
- “Last Saved” and “Game Started” timestamps manually matched,
- Unnatural experience levels and item placements.
This is not gameplay — this is fabrication.
- Theft of a Mewtwo: A second piece of evidence, which the court already holds on record, shows Bepo stealing a Mewtwo from another community member.
That isn’t simply against game ethics — it’s symbolic of a character willing to deceive for personal gain.
So, if we are to question credibility, let us not ignore the defendant's digital fingerprints at the scene of the crime.
II. On the Witness Hime – Unfit Testimony Due to Self-Inflicted Intoxication
It has come to our attention — and I quote — that @hime became incapacitated after challenging her own reflection to a drinking contest.
This is not satire; it is the reality of our witness’ current state, rendering her incapable of objective reasoning.
Now, Hime has previously attempted to redirect the courtroom’s attention toward alleged Pokémon abuse committed by @Peroroncino. Let us be perfectly clear:
- No testimony, no screenshot, no log, nor witness supports this.
- Not a single verified claim has been submitted that even remotely supports this accusation.
It is nothing more than a desperate deflection — perhaps made under the influence — intended to discredit a clean record.
III. On Sentimental Letters and Nintendo Switches
The handwritten letter from Mrs. Reloaded is touching. However, it cannot be taken as clinical proof of PTSD, nor can it be used to excuse behavior by appealing to emotion. No matter how heartfelt a bequest involving a Nintendo Switch 2 may be, it does not substitute for evidence.
This courtroom operates on logic and facts — not poetry and pixels.
IV. Final Considerations
- The defense urges the court to consider the reliability of sources, not their popularity.
- @Bepo D. Bear has a documented history of unethical digital conduct.
- @Hime’s accusations stem from a position of emotional instability and lack factual grounding.
- Meanwhile, @Peroroncino remains untouched by evidence — his record, clean; his name, dragged without justification.
Let us return the courtroom to reason.
Thank you, Your Honor.
— Counsel for the Defense
Tyki Mikk&Sentinel
Post automatically merged:
Last edited:
@Reborn @hime
@Yoho
@Jaguark101
@Kerkovian
@Devilbat
@CoC: Color of Clowns
@Pot Goblin @Bepo D. Bear @Mr. Reloaded
@TheKnightOfTheSea
@Ali v2
@AL sama
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
While we respect the witness’s theatrical bedside manner and heartfelt concern for sofa logistics, the Prosecution must now address the glaring inconsistencies and convenient loopholes in his testimony.
1. Emotional Bias Over Clinical Neutrality
The witness proudly admits to being “poetic” and “emotional” when treating patients. While charming, this compromises his objectivity. Psychiatry is a science—not a platform for literary flair. Diagnoses must be made from data, not from half an ass cheek.
2. Confirmation Bias in Diagnosis
He claims to be the “second opinion” supporting a PTSD diagnosis. Yet, we have not been presented with the first opinion, nor has the court been given any verifiable documentation of the initial diagnosis, practitioner identity, or medical process. In legal terms: this is hearsay stacked on top of self-validation.
3. Comedy Trial Evidence
The defense leans heavily on a document first presented during a comedy trial. The witness excuses this by referencing "budget issues" and "Chinese tariffs"—irrelevant to the authenticity of a clinical report. If you can’t distinguish courtroom satire from medical testimony, how can we trust your assessment of psychological trauma?
4. Selective Citation Without Application
While systemic desensitization is a real technique, the witness failed to provide any logs, notes, or clinical charts showing its use on Mr. Goblin. Quoting PubMed does not equate to applying its methods. As of now, the entire process sounds improvised and undocumented.
5. Weak Causal Link to Criminal Behavior
Finally, the doctor admits he cannot be certain that PTSD caused Mr. Goblin’s actions. This makes his testimony speculative at best, and inadmissible at worst. Psychiatry does not function on “maybe.” The burden of proof here lies not in compassion, but in concrete correlation between diagnosis and the accused’s behavior.
We ask the court to treat this testimony not as medical fact, but as theatrical mitigation disguised as expert analysis. Compassion does not substitute due process.
First Part
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
Before we allow emotional anecdotes or inebriated distractions to obscure the truth, the defense would like to clarify a few critical matters regarding both the credibility of @hime and the alleged victimhood of @Bepo D. Bear.
I. The Case of Bepo D. Bear – A Habitual Violator of Pokémon Ethics
While the prosecution attempts to paint @Bepo as some elusive, misunderstood figure, the facts show otherwise. Let us review:
So, if we are to question credibility, let us not ignore the defendant's digital fingerprints at the scene of the crime.
II. On the Witness Hime – Unfit Testimony Due to Self-Inflicted Intoxication
It has come to our attention — and I quote — that @hime became incapacitated after challenging her own reflection to a drinking contest.
This is not satire; it is the reality of our witness’ current state, rendering her incapable of objective reasoning.
Now, Hime has previously attempted to redirect the courtroom’s attention toward alleged Pokémon abuse committed by @Peroroncino. Let us be perfectly clear:
III. On Sentimental Letters and Nintendo Switches
The handwritten letter from Mrs. Reloaded is touching. However, it cannot be taken as clinical proof of PTSD, nor can it be used to excuse behavior by appealing to emotion. No matter how heartfelt a bequest involving a Nintendo Switch 2 may be, it does not substitute for evidence.
This courtroom operates on logic and facts — not poetry and pixels.
IV. Final Considerations
Let us return the courtroom to reason.
Thank you, Your Honor.
— Counsel for the Defense
Tyki Mikk&Sentinel
@Yoho
@Jaguark101
@Kerkovian
@Devilbat
@CoC: Color of Clowns
@Pot Goblin @Bepo D. Bear @Mr. Reloaded
@TheKnightOfTheSea
@Ali v2
@AL sama
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
While we respect the witness’s theatrical bedside manner and heartfelt concern for sofa logistics, the Prosecution must now address the glaring inconsistencies and convenient loopholes in his testimony.
1. Emotional Bias Over Clinical Neutrality
The witness proudly admits to being “poetic” and “emotional” when treating patients. While charming, this compromises his objectivity. Psychiatry is a science—not a platform for literary flair. Diagnoses must be made from data, not from half an ass cheek.
2. Confirmation Bias in Diagnosis
He claims to be the “second opinion” supporting a PTSD diagnosis. Yet, we have not been presented with the first opinion, nor has the court been given any verifiable documentation of the initial diagnosis, practitioner identity, or medical process. In legal terms: this is hearsay stacked on top of self-validation.
3. Comedy Trial Evidence
The defense leans heavily on a document first presented during a comedy trial. The witness excuses this by referencing "budget issues" and "Chinese tariffs"—irrelevant to the authenticity of a clinical report. If you can’t distinguish courtroom satire from medical testimony, how can we trust your assessment of psychological trauma?
4. Selective Citation Without Application
While systemic desensitization is a real technique, the witness failed to provide any logs, notes, or clinical charts showing its use on Mr. Goblin. Quoting PubMed does not equate to applying its methods. As of now, the entire process sounds improvised and undocumented.
5. Weak Causal Link to Criminal Behavior
Finally, the doctor admits he cannot be certain that PTSD caused Mr. Goblin’s actions. This makes his testimony speculative at best, and inadmissible at worst. Psychiatry does not function on “maybe.” The burden of proof here lies not in compassion, but in concrete correlation between diagnosis and the accused’s behavior.
We ask the court to treat this testimony not as medical fact, but as theatrical mitigation disguised as expert analysis. Compassion does not substitute due process.
First Part
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
Before we allow emotional anecdotes or inebriated distractions to obscure the truth, the defense would like to clarify a few critical matters regarding both the credibility of @hime and the alleged victimhood of @Bepo D. Bear.
I. The Case of Bepo D. Bear – A Habitual Violator of Pokémon Ethics
While the prosecution attempts to paint @Bepo as some elusive, misunderstood figure, the facts show otherwise. Let us review:
- Tampering and Hacking: The evidence presented from the PKHeX interface clearly shows manipulated stats, illegal Pokémon creation, and falsified in-game records. This isn't speculation — it's irrefutable digital proof. Any seasoned trainer will confirm:
- Maxed BP and coins,
- “Last Saved” and “Game Started” timestamps manually matched,
- Unnatural experience levels and item placements.
This is not gameplay — this is fabrication.
- Theft of a Mewtwo: A second piece of evidence, which the court already holds on record, shows Bepo stealing a Mewtwo from another community member.
That isn’t simply against game ethics — it’s symbolic of a character willing to deceive for personal gain.
So, if we are to question credibility, let us not ignore the defendant's digital fingerprints at the scene of the crime.
II. On the Witness Hime – Unfit Testimony Due to Self-Inflicted Intoxication
It has come to our attention — and I quote — that @hime became incapacitated after challenging her own reflection to a drinking contest.
This is not satire; it is the reality of our witness’ current state, rendering her incapable of objective reasoning.
Now, Hime has previously attempted to redirect the courtroom’s attention toward alleged Pokémon abuse committed by @Peroroncino. Let us be perfectly clear:
- No testimony, no screenshot, no log, nor witness supports this.
- Not a single verified claim has been submitted that even remotely supports this accusation.
It is nothing more than a desperate deflection — perhaps made under the influence — intended to discredit a clean record.
III. On Sentimental Letters and Nintendo Switches
The handwritten letter from Mrs. Reloaded is touching. However, it cannot be taken as clinical proof of PTSD, nor can it be used to excuse behavior by appealing to emotion. No matter how heartfelt a bequest involving a Nintendo Switch 2 may be, it does not substitute for evidence.
This courtroom operates on logic and facts — not poetry and pixels.
IV. Final Considerations
- The defense urges the court to consider the reliability of sources, not their popularity.
- @Bepo has a documented history of unethical digital conduct.
- @Hime’s accusations stem from a position of emotional instability and lack factual grounding.
- Meanwhile, @Peroroncino remains untouched by evidence — his record, clean; his name, dragged without justification.
Let us return the courtroom to reason.
Thank you, Your Honor.
— Counsel for the Defense
Tyki Mikk&Sentinel
Post automatically merged:
If you can't even correctly identify one of the defendants then what are we doing here
Win or lose I'm putting in a complaint to have you disbarred
Post automatically merged:
Not only speaking out of turn but tagging the wrong person
If you can't even correctly identify one of the defendants then what are we doing here
Win or lose I'm putting in a complaint to have you disbarred
If you can't even correctly identify one of the defendants then what are we doing here
Win or lose I'm putting in a complaint to have you disbarred
I hope the jury is putting this agenda riddled unprofessionalism in mind
To think I invited you to my Big BBQ Bash happening later this year
@Reborn @hime
@Yoho
@Jaguark101
@Kerkovian
@Devilbat
@CoC: Color of Clowns
@Pot Goblin @Bepo D. Bear @Mr. Reloaded
@TheKnightOfTheSea
@Ali v2
@AL sama
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
While we respect the witness’s theatrical bedside manner and heartfelt concern for sofa logistics, the Prosecution must now address the glaring inconsistencies and convenient loopholes in his testimony.
1. Emotional Bias Over Clinical Neutrality
The witness proudly admits to being “poetic” and “emotional” when treating patients. While charming, this compromises his objectivity. Psychiatry is a science—not a platform for literary flair. Diagnoses must be made from data, not from half an ass cheek.
2. Confirmation Bias in Diagnosis
He claims to be the “second opinion” supporting a PTSD diagnosis. Yet, we have not been presented with the first opinion, nor has the court been given any verifiable documentation of the initial diagnosis, practitioner identity, or medical process. In legal terms: this is hearsay stacked on top of self-validation.
3. Comedy Trial Evidence
The defense leans heavily on a document first presented during a comedy trial. The witness excuses this by referencing "budget issues" and "Chinese tariffs"—irrelevant to the authenticity of a clinical report. If you can’t distinguish courtroom satire from medical testimony, how can we trust your assessment of psychological trauma?
4. Selective Citation Without Application
While systemic desensitization is a real technique, the witness failed to provide any logs, notes, or clinical charts showing its use on Mr. Goblin. Quoting PubMed does not equate to applying its methods. As of now, the entire process sounds improvised and undocumented.
5. Weak Causal Link to Criminal Behavior
Finally, the doctor admits he cannot be certain that PTSD caused Mr. Goblin’s actions. This makes his testimony speculative at best, and inadmissible at worst. Psychiatry does not function on “maybe.” The burden of proof here lies not in compassion, but in concrete correlation between diagnosis and the accused’s behavior.
We ask the court to treat this testimony not as medical fact, but as theatrical mitigation disguised as expert analysis. Compassion does not substitute due process.
First Part
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
Before we allow emotional anecdotes or inebriated distractions to obscure the truth, the defense would like to clarify a few critical matters regarding both the credibility of @hime and the alleged victimhood of @Bepo D. Bear.
I. The Case of Bepo D. Bear – A Habitual Violator of Pokémon Ethics
While the prosecution attempts to paint @Bepo D. Bear as some elusive, misunderstood figure, the facts show otherwise. Let us review:
So, if we are to question credibility, let us not ignore the defendant's digital fingerprints at the scene of the crime.
II. On the Witness Hime – Unfit Testimony Due to Self-Inflicted Intoxication
It has come to our attention — and I quote — that @hime became incapacitated after challenging her own reflection to a drinking contest.
This is not satire; it is the reality of our witness’ current state, rendering her incapable of objective reasoning.
Now, Hime has previously attempted to redirect the courtroom’s attention toward alleged Pokémon abuse committed by @Peroroncino. Let us be perfectly clear:
III. On Sentimental Letters and Nintendo Switches
The handwritten letter from Mrs. Reloaded is touching. However, it cannot be taken as clinical proof of PTSD, nor can it be used to excuse behavior by appealing to emotion. No matter how heartfelt a bequest involving a Nintendo Switch 2 may be, it does not substitute for evidence.
This courtroom operates on logic and facts — not poetry and pixels.
IV. Final Considerations
Let us return the courtroom to reason.
Thank you, Your Honor.
— Counsel for the Defense
Tyki Mikk&Sentinel
@Yoho
@Jaguark101
@Kerkovian
@Devilbat
@CoC: Color of Clowns
@Pot Goblin @Bepo D. Bear @Mr. Reloaded
@TheKnightOfTheSea
@Ali v2
@AL sama
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
While we respect the witness’s theatrical bedside manner and heartfelt concern for sofa logistics, the Prosecution must now address the glaring inconsistencies and convenient loopholes in his testimony.
1. Emotional Bias Over Clinical Neutrality
The witness proudly admits to being “poetic” and “emotional” when treating patients. While charming, this compromises his objectivity. Psychiatry is a science—not a platform for literary flair. Diagnoses must be made from data, not from half an ass cheek.
2. Confirmation Bias in Diagnosis
He claims to be the “second opinion” supporting a PTSD diagnosis. Yet, we have not been presented with the first opinion, nor has the court been given any verifiable documentation of the initial diagnosis, practitioner identity, or medical process. In legal terms: this is hearsay stacked on top of self-validation.
3. Comedy Trial Evidence
The defense leans heavily on a document first presented during a comedy trial. The witness excuses this by referencing "budget issues" and "Chinese tariffs"—irrelevant to the authenticity of a clinical report. If you can’t distinguish courtroom satire from medical testimony, how can we trust your assessment of psychological trauma?
4. Selective Citation Without Application
While systemic desensitization is a real technique, the witness failed to provide any logs, notes, or clinical charts showing its use on Mr. Goblin. Quoting PubMed does not equate to applying its methods. As of now, the entire process sounds improvised and undocumented.
5. Weak Causal Link to Criminal Behavior
Finally, the doctor admits he cannot be certain that PTSD caused Mr. Goblin’s actions. This makes his testimony speculative at best, and inadmissible at worst. Psychiatry does not function on “maybe.” The burden of proof here lies not in compassion, but in concrete correlation between diagnosis and the accused’s behavior.
We ask the court to treat this testimony not as medical fact, but as theatrical mitigation disguised as expert analysis. Compassion does not substitute due process.
First Part
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Your Honor, esteemed members of the court,
Before we allow emotional anecdotes or inebriated distractions to obscure the truth, the defense would like to clarify a few critical matters regarding both the credibility of @hime and the alleged victimhood of @Bepo D. Bear.
I. The Case of Bepo D. Bear – A Habitual Violator of Pokémon Ethics
While the prosecution attempts to paint @Bepo D. Bear as some elusive, misunderstood figure, the facts show otherwise. Let us review:
- Tampering and Hacking: The evidence presented from the PKHeX interface clearly shows manipulated stats, illegal Pokémon creation, and falsified in-game records. This isn't speculation — it's irrefutable digital proof. Any seasoned trainer will confirm:
- Maxed BP and coins,
- “Last Saved” and “Game Started” timestamps manually matched,
- Unnatural experience levels and item placements.
This is not gameplay — this is fabrication.
- Theft of a Mewtwo: A second piece of evidence, which the court already holds on record, shows Bepo stealing a Mewtwo from another community member.
That isn’t simply against game ethics — it’s symbolic of a character willing to deceive for personal gain.
So, if we are to question credibility, let us not ignore the defendant's digital fingerprints at the scene of the crime.
II. On the Witness Hime – Unfit Testimony Due to Self-Inflicted Intoxication
It has come to our attention — and I quote — that @hime became incapacitated after challenging her own reflection to a drinking contest.
This is not satire; it is the reality of our witness’ current state, rendering her incapable of objective reasoning.
Now, Hime has previously attempted to redirect the courtroom’s attention toward alleged Pokémon abuse committed by @Peroroncino. Let us be perfectly clear:
- No testimony, no screenshot, no log, nor witness supports this.
- Not a single verified claim has been submitted that even remotely supports this accusation.
It is nothing more than a desperate deflection — perhaps made under the influence — intended to discredit a clean record.
III. On Sentimental Letters and Nintendo Switches
The handwritten letter from Mrs. Reloaded is touching. However, it cannot be taken as clinical proof of PTSD, nor can it be used to excuse behavior by appealing to emotion. No matter how heartfelt a bequest involving a Nintendo Switch 2 may be, it does not substitute for evidence.
This courtroom operates on logic and facts — not poetry and pixels.
IV. Final Considerations
- The defense urges the court to consider the reliability of sources, not their popularity.
- @Bepo D. Bear has a documented history of unethical digital conduct.
- @Hime’s accusations stem from a position of emotional instability and lack factual grounding.
- Meanwhile, @Peroroncino remains untouched by evidence — his record, clean; his name, dragged without justification.
Let us return the courtroom to reason.
Thank you, Your Honor.
— Counsel for the Defense
Tyki Mikk&Sentinel
Post automatically merged:
In my court, evidence is what matters because I have zero tolerance policy towards fake news. 😤
And, @hime you dragged @Peroroncino. Even though this capybara furry needs to be put in jail with all his fur shaved, but without evidence, it appears that you deliberately dragged him as an attempt to deflect.
@Tyki_Mikk - you can question both accused if you feel the need....
