That’s normal in One Piece. Rocks knew Loki was strong. Garp beat on Luffy every day as training, way more than Rocks ever did to Loki.
I think it’s wild to compare training to deliberately injuring a child at least twice.
Garp had a purpose in what he did, it was to make Luffy strong. Yes, it’s a bit of shonen slapstick “child abuse can be funny” that would be vile in the real world, but in One Piece it’s fine.
Do you really think that scene of Rocks is comparable, and we’re meant to be thinking “oh that loveable rogue Rocks” as he beats on Loki to force Harald back and laughs about it as the narrator calls him a madman?
He never used hostages against the admiral, that’s made up. More likely the admiral just wasn’t a challenge.
No, it’s speculation.
All we know, factually, is that Rocks took hostages, and Rocks killed an Admiral. We also know that Rocks really didn’t look like he’d been in a fight after it.
It‘s a very suspicious set of circumstances. Why do the hostages even come into it, if Rocks can just bulldoze through an Admiral?
Xebec respected Harald after a single clash and kept valuing loyalty the entire flashback, enough to make even a teen Kaido look bad next to him. Xebec was always shown as upfront and confrontational.
I wouldn’t especially say there’s much focus on “valuing loyalty.” He certainly likes Harald (albeit with ulterior motives). He also thrashes Harald’s child, which Harald does not know about, which is not really so how a person should treat their friends.
His relationship with the crew is not especially fleshed out beyond them not liking him much, the crew themselves not liking each other much, and them only loosely being tied for a common goal. Not really much loyalty there.
And yes, he seems to love his wife and kids, which is nice for him, but it’s not enough for full redemption.
And he’s not always upfront, because again, where does taking hostages fit in with that description?
The dude had the balls to infiltrate Mary Geoise solo and threaten Imu right at his face, and you’re still suggesting that he used underhanded tactics against an admiral? lol
Well, yes, because he factually did use the underhanded tactic of taking hostages in his attempt to infiltrate Mariejois. What was noble and striaghtforward about that?
Whitebeard valued the crew too. He was the first to raise suspicions about a traitor and he was furious when Shakky was kidnapped. Whitebeard followed him for over a decade without complaint, aside from when Xebec went too far with Loki. Whitebeard had no schemes, nothing to gain, and could have left any time. The fact he stayed says everything. He most likely thought of the crew as family.
There’s been nothing to show Whitebeard had any fondness for the rest of Rocks at all.
Saying that he thinks that it’s suspicious how quickly the Marines came doesn’t mean he cares about the crew. It’s not like he’s weeping and wailing about a potential traitor. He just factually says it’s suspicious how quick they are coming.
Everyone loves Shakky, but she’s not a Rocks Pirate either. Whitebeard having a soft spot for her doesn’t mean he gives a monkeys about Linlin or Marlon, for example.
Whitebeard was with Rocks to make money for the people of Sphinx. That’s what he had to gain. He couldn’t have left because of his pride as a pirate, having been beaten in a Davy Back fight.
There’s very little to suggest that he ever thought of them as family. That’s the role his eventual crew played in his life. Everything about Rocks from the beginning has been consistent- they never liked each other and were only it in for a big score. Whitebeard said to Oden he had loads of bad experiences with them.