Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
The problem is that it's exactly that. As in productivist and meritocratic. It's not just about the marxist notion of the accumulation of capitals or the private ownership of the means of production.

That's one of the very major things that the USSR didn't aknowledge (at least not in my knowledge). This two mindset are the main ideological tools of capitalism as such they constitute what capitalism is also in nature and have major systematic applications.

To create a better word with common ownership of the means of production will not completely delete the meritocratic especially, in fact it might be the one thing that will transform the entire society into the communist or anarchist one.

We can't just separate capitalism from productivism or meritocracy. Just like we absolutely must not separate anti-capitalism from anti-meritocratic struggle.




Your point?
Blax is correct. Capitalism really is separate from productivity and merit, as you really need neither to be successful under capitalism. However, they are all symbiotic now since productivity and meritocracy are used to mask the failures of capitalism as a system.

Poverty is an inevitable byproduct of capitalism, and more poverty means more crime since material conditions is the #1 reason people commit crimes in the first place. If you commit a crime, then it is treated asa moral failure in the individual, and that he is lazy without merit for not pulling himself up by his bootstraps.
 
A lot of people that date trans people are actually having weird transphobic fetishes. They are usually dehumanizing them and fetichicizing them for their own self pleasure while completely denying the reality of their relationship which can become an extrem danger for a trans person when the cis man (usually it's cis-men who are a problem) is faced with the reality that they are dating a trans person in public
No, ideologically right-wing people do not date and have sex with transgenders. Leftists do
Post automatically merged:

depending on how legit these discord messages were between them, calling someone "my love" definitely doesnt sound like you are dehumanizing them in any way tbh.
I'm not sure what side you're on. Do you agree he was a leftist or not? No offense, but you seem to fence sit a lot in this PM
 
@Uncle Van and also @Blax Blah

I think there is a missunderstanding in the way I'm talking about Capitalism, productivism and merit. I'll come back on what I mean by that:

- Merit : Capitalism - as a system combined with the enlightned era philosophies - pushed the emergence of Meritocracy, which is a system that pushes the false belief that meritocracy exist (with all the sub ideologies that come with it)

This means that merit does not exist. As such, capitalists don't need merit - like you said - to be successful. When I'm talking about capitalism being meritocratic, I'm saying that capitalism creates, feeds and use a false system (called meritocracy).

- Productivism: Same thing, when I'm talking about capitalism, I'm not saying that capitalists are necessarily productive, I'm saying that capitalism as an interconnected system, creates the systemic need for productivity to be pushed to the maximum.

As such, it also creates, feed and use a false system of belief that productivism under capitalism is the necessary step to create a more equitable and safe society

Capitalism

Basically, I'm saying that capitalism is a system that creates belief systems and sub interconnected systems that feeds on each others : For ex productivism feeds on meritocracy which is used as a justification and both are used a justification to perpetuate other domination systems such as ableism, patriarchy, imperialism etc.

Those systems are not just here as tool of justifications, but are actively used as tools for more exploitations.

This is why I explain that Capitalism can exist without meritocracy and productivism mindset but can't survive without. Simply because for the population to accept capitalism, Meritocracy is necessary or there will be riots.

You could retork that Capitalism can survive without the beliefs in Meritocracy or productivity if the means of production and wealth are accaparated and used through force and people being inslaved, and I would agree, it can happen, for many years to many decades in fact.

But I consider this system - personnally - as a dying stage of capitalism. The last stand if you prefer, something that can only end on a Massive revolution. We can't return to the old system if there are no people to justify it or take advantage of it through the common shared false belief systems that are productivism and meritocracy.

I hope the missunderstanding is cleared.


No, ideologically right-wing people do not date and have sex with transgenders. Leftists do
Talk to trans people, you will see that it's false. In fact, some Trans people are racist bigots who voted for Trump. Trans people are not necessarily leftists and do not date only leftists.
 
Last edited:
It's ok. Mass immigration isn't bad& every nation should follow GB example. Welcome people uncontrollably & let them take positions of power until you become the guest into your own country and end up following their own customs instead of them, acclimating to the new environment.(Which is never going to happen. All they are going to do is take benefits and the 2md and 3rd generation would be more fanatical.about the customsof the nations they have roots from..)


New world conquered nation.
"Bu..bu..but islamophobia" The contradictory mess that is the left should have been against the mass immigration but are too stupid to see & instead focus on wanting whatever the select elite wants to the letter.
 
It's ok. Mass immigration isn't bad& every nation should follow GB example. Welcome people uncontrollably & let them take positions of power until you become the guest into your own country and end up following their own customs instead of them, acclimating to the new environment.(Which is never going to happen. All they are going to do is take benefits and the 2md and 3rd generation would be more fanatical.about the customsof the nations they have roots from..)


New world conquered nation.
"Bu..bu..but islamophobia" The contradictory mess that is the left should have been against the mass immigration but are too stupid to see & instead focus on wanting whatever the select elite wants to the letter.
You are really afraid of change are you?
 
Talk to trans people, you will see that it's false. In fact, some Trans people are racist bigots who voted for Trump. Trans people are not necessarily leftists and do not date only leftists
So how do you account for him dating a transgender?

You have to say either
-he believed his transgender boyfriend would become his girlfriend after transitioning. Which means he believes in gender change (very right wing of him loooool)
-he was dating what he perceived to be a guy, meaning he was gay. A gay right-winger is not right wing

Trans people are racist bigots who voted for Trump.
Many trans and gays voted for Trump. This doesn't mean they are right wing gays/trans, this means Trump has capitulated and is not really all that right-wing at all

(he is not) (Trump is a centrist with populist leanings but ideologically is not right wing really at all)
 
It's ok. Mass immigration isn't bad& every nation should follow GB example. Welcome people uncontrollably & let them take positions of power until you become the guest into your own country and end up following their own customs instead of them, acclimating to the new environment.(Which is never going to happen. All they are going to do is take benefits and the 2md and 3rd generation would be more fanatical.about the customsof the nations they have roots from..)


New world conquered nation.
"Bu..bu..but islamophobia" The contradictory mess that is the left should have been against the mass immigration but are too stupid to see & instead focus on wanting whatever the select elite wants to the letter.
What power did you have in your country, before immigration?
 
You are really afraid of change are you?
If by change you mean letting a nation be destroyed, so some religion nutjobs land to a foreign country only for him to gain welfare benefits and ending up marrying their cousin meanwhile your counrtymen fell to ruin yes I am against that change but not afraid... I am appaled by it.

If you want to fuck your cousin and birth her children then you need to check yourself...
Post automatically merged:

What power did you have in your country, before immigration?
:memehm:
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
So how do you account for him dating a transgender?

You have to say either
-he believed his transgender boyfriend would become his girlfriend after transitioning. Which means he believes in gender change (very right wing of him loooool)
-he was dating what he perceived to be a guy, meaning he was gay. A gay right-winger is not right wing



Many trans and gays voted for Trump. This doesn't mean they are right wing gays/trans, this means Trump has capitulated and is not really all that right-wing at all

(he is not) (Trump is a centrist with populist leanings but ideologically is not right wing really at all)
Trump is a textbook Far rightist....in no world is Trump even remotely centrist.

Someone being so ill-informed that they vote against their own interest doesnt mean the person they voted for is similar to them ideologically.
 
Hey @RyoQ @Afroking in a couple of days I would like to talk with you about capitalism and why I think it's bad, if you want to

Imo the path you are on leads somewhere very dark and wrong, and maybe discussing why capitalism is bad will make you more interested in why so many right wing ideas are wrong
 
Last edited:
If you support what the government official is saying here:


Congrats. You are a fascist.

CLear and unbiased and uncensored information is not a priviledge, it's a fundamental right. Not just of the US constitution, but of the human kind in general.


So how do you account for him dating a transgender?

You have to say either
-he believed his transgender boyfriend would become his girlfriend after transitioning. Which means he believes in gender change (very right wing of him loooool)
-he was dating what he perceived to be a guy, meaning he was gay. A gay right-winger is not right wing
You propose a false dilema. He could be dehumanizing her and still think she is a woman. Dehumanization is a spectrum, remember ?


Many trans and gays voted for Trump. This doesn't mean they are right wing gays/trans, this means Trump has capitulated and is not really all that right-wing at all
Let me translate your bullshit:

"Many Trans and gays voted for racist reason for a far right fascist, this doesn't mean they are rightwing, but that Trump is not really rightist"

If you think Trump is a centrist, you have the political awereness of a peanut forgotten by a squirrel running for his life in an pro-hunt american ad.


If by change you mean letting a nation be destroyed, so some religion nutjobs land to a foreign country only for him to gain welfare benefits and ending up marrying their cousin meanwhile your counrtymen fell to ruin yes I am against that change but not afraid... I am appaled by it.

If you want to fuck your cousin and birth her children then you need to check yourself...
Do you want me to look around for the % of little insecure white western boyz who marry their cousin?

It's gonna be fun, but I'm not sure you will like the result.

Maybe you should tone down the conspiracy theories, stop looking at the same news chanel 24/7, look at other youtubers, maybe even go out and meet a muslim person or two to ask them question (do not abord women) and maybe I don't know, invite them to a drink, be a fucking normal decent human being a go take a walk to breath some air and touch grass instead of spreading racist theories.

That will do us BOTH some good I think.
 
Hey @RyoQ @Afroking in a couple of days I would like to talk with you about capitalism and why it's bad, if you want to

Imo the path you are on leads somewhere very dark and wrong, and maybe discussing why capitalism is bad will make you more interested in why so many right wing ideas are wrong
Right now I'm dealing with some trauma from my past but in a few days I think I will be well and I can really focus on talking about it well
Post automatically merged:

 
Last edited:

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Hey @RyoQ @Afroking in a couple of days I would like to talk with you about capitalism and why it's bad, if you want to

Imo the path you are on leads somewhere very dark and wrong, and maybe discussing why capitalism is bad will make you more interested in why so many right wing ideas are wrong
More so I think you should explain the flaws of conservatism.

"Conservatism is the theoretical voice against the power of the subordinate classes. Historically, the conservative has favored liberty for the higher order and constrant for the lower orders. What the conservative sees and dislikes in equality is not a threat to freedom, but in its extension. For in that extension, he sees a loss of his own freedom."

This quote explains the fundamental flaw of the ideology as a whole.
 
More so I think you should explain the flaws of conservatism.

"Conservatism is the theoretical voice against the power of the subordinate classes. Historically, the conservative has favored liberty for the higher order and constrant for the lower orders. What the conservative sees and dislikes in equality is not a threat to freedom, but in its extension. For in that extension, he sees a loss of his own freedom."

This quote explains the fundamental flaw of the ideology as a whole.
Maybe, for me I was pretty immune to every argument, except one that destroyed my entire conception, that wage labor is exploitation

Conservatism, to someone who doesn't know about that issue, can seem like the last bastion of freedom from an otherwise crazy world of woke people and social insanity
Post automatically merged:

I think that's really the Achilles' heel of almost every political view
 
More so I think you should explain the flaws of conservatism.

"Conservatism is the theoretical voice against the power of the subordinate classes. Historically, the conservative has favored liberty for the higher order and constrant for the lower orders. What the conservative sees and dislikes in equality is not a threat to freedom, but in its extension. For in that extension, he sees a loss of his own freedom."

This quote explains the fundamental flaw of the ideology as a whole.
I mean class really doesn't make much sense without knowing the relation between a capitalist and a worker, that's what divides society into two economic classes
Post automatically merged:

WHAT THE FUCK?! I just heard it was 4 but now its 6 even!?


I'm really sorry to hear that

Why is there a fire there though?
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Maybe, for me I was pretty immune to every argument, except one that destroyed my entire conception, that wage labor is exploitation

Conservatism, to someone who doesn't know about that issue, can seem like the last bastion of freedom from an otherwise crazy world of woke people and social insanity
Post automatically merged:

I think that's really the Achilles' heel of almost every political view
I mean class really doesn't make much sense without knowing the relation between a capitalist and a worker, that's what divides society into two economic classes
Post automatically merged:



I'm really sorry to hear that

Why is there a fire there though?
The ideology adapts to any new problem. The primary driving forcd of conservatism is fear. If groups are to gain power and freedom, they(conservatives) in turn will lose a proportion of their own power and freedom. Decades of propaganda made them believe that.

There's also the fact that the propaganda of merit and hard work made them view billionaires as people who got their wealth through virtue and merit, and that they too to achieve such wealth if they work hard enough. They project themselves unto billionaires creating upside down populism.
 
Top