Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
Scientist, but more so vulgarizer or critical thinker believe in the saintity of rationnality. Sadly, this implies that they will underestimate their own biases or social biases that could enter in conflict with their reflection. That's what I'm trying to explain to Zenos who depicted this willingness to show a form of over-rationnality at the expanse of major biases. When he overcomes that, everything will shift.
I love it. Because the fact that you still remember this means that I did the job well... at least in term of communication. :D
I told you. I ask for this:
I love it. Because the fact that you still remember this means that I did the job well... at least in term of communication. :D
I told you. I ask for this:
Wait until he's in the mood to elaborate on this one so we can finally show him the respect his Majesty deserves and MAYBE he'll lower himself to our humble ranks and post his Great Big Explanation every man, woman and child has been waiting for all their lives.
In the meantime let's sing God Shave the King.
In the meantime let's sing God Shave the King.
, but im not going to open this can of worms. . .without being aware of what we dont yet know you cant do any actual research though. and the scientific field is competitive, so everyone is questioning the next motherfucker.
[automerge]1762647885[/automerge]
apparently its a good thing i missed that lol.
[automerge]1762648055[/automerge]
while being more likely to be atheists, wasnt the rate still fairly even for religious affiliation vs no religious affiliation?
[automerge]1762648178[/automerge]
oh i forgot to add these two quotes to my post here^
[automerge]1762648237[/automerge]
you are tempting me to open the can of worms
[automerge]1762648287[/automerge]
i will rather "sing" Jesus war geil by edgar wasser ;D
[automerge]1762647885[/automerge]
apparently its a good thing i missed that lol.
[automerge]1762648055[/automerge]
while being more likely to be atheists, wasnt the rate still fairly even for religious affiliation vs no religious affiliation?
[automerge]1762648178[/automerge]
oh i forgot to add these two quotes to my post here^
[automerge]1762648237[/automerge]
you are tempting me to open the can of worms
[automerge]1762648287[/automerge]
i will rather "sing" Jesus war geil by edgar wasser ;D
Last edited:
Mods didn't like the fact that I brought political discussion to One Piece and the Nakama thread on top of questionning their moderation. To this day, they are still refusing me the entry of this thread for this very reason
lmao
Yeah. Because minimum was not enough. To really listen to something that can shaken our own biases, we need to have a form of deep respect for the other side. Enough to negate the biases that comes with listening. It's a form of leap of faith. I think it's the best way to describe this process. At least that's how it feels to me everytime I take it
Indeed. It's quite logical, both were political battles.
lmao
Yeah. Because minimum was not enough. To really listen to something that can shaken our own biases, we need to have a form of deep respect for the other side. Enough to negate the biases that comes with listening. It's a form of leap of faith. I think it's the best way to describe this process. At least that's how it feels to me everytime I take it
Right, it's the same kinda escalation he used for the carrot will join agenda
Mods didn't like the fact that I brought political discussion to One Piece and the Nakama thread on top of questionning their moderation. To this day, they are still refusing me the entry of this thread for this very reason
lmao
Yeah. Because minimum was not enough. To really listen to something that can shaken our own biases, we need to have a form of deep respect for the other side. Enough to negate the biases that comes with listening. It's a form of leap of faith. I think it's the best way to describe this process. At least that's how it feels to me everytime I take it
Indeed. It's quite logical, both were political battles.
lmao
Yeah. Because minimum was not enough. To really listen to something that can shaken our own biases, we need to have a form of deep respect for the other side. Enough to negate the biases that comes with listening. It's a form of leap of faith. I think it's the best way to describe this process. At least that's how it feels to me everytime I take it
Indeed. It's quite logical, both were political battles.
Same energy.
Man please, take a step back and think about your worstgen 'career'. For years you're using the same argumentation patterns for different topics, each time you fall for major logical fallacies and then when you feel driven into a corner, your posts become incoherent word salad dripping with arrogance and full of name calling.
Please do some soul searching.
Indeed. I'm using the same tactic. I create impactfull concepts in order for you to understand adn remember them rapidly. But whether they are relevant or not is a completely different matter.
Do not make the mistake of thinking that because I create these concept the same way, they have the same weight. All of this is coherent.
And, really... you should drop the forum troll facade. It prevents you from looking at the subtilities of other people's argumentations. You really have no moral lesson to give me on this basis.
Do not make the mistake of thinking that because I create these concept the same way, they have the same weight. All of this is coherent.
And, really... you should drop the forum troll facade. It prevents you from looking at the subtilities of other people's argumentations. You really have no moral lesson to give me on this basis.
I'm not a normal poster on this forum. I have a goal: For this forum to be a more positive place. So do not be surprised if I'm not talking like other people here. I need to find solutions to convince everyone and potentially or not change things so ofc this can create conflicts or weird interactions and weird speech patterns/argumentations. It's time for you people to accept that. (no matter if I succeed or not)
Probably won't come tonight. You hook me into a discussion. I can't concentrate on it at the moment.
Probably won't come tonight. You hook me into a discussion. I can't concentrate on it at the moment.
Last edited:
You were banned for repeatedly bringing real world politics into a One Piece thread and constantly calling people racist, sexist, and misogynists as a counter argument to them not believing Carrot would be a SH or big player.
Still warping the facts to fill your fantasy of being a revolutionary. Gorilla out.
Still warping the facts to fill your fantasy of being a revolutionary. Gorilla out.
@Bisoromi Bear btw weren't you banned or am I tripping
"constantly" lmao. You must come from Marseille. But yeah, that's what I meant by bringing polititics and exposing the moderation there. There were problems then and there are still problems now of unmoderated sexism, sanism, transphobia, racism etc. ALL OVER this forum. And it's not because of Carrot. But I can only speak about it here since it's a political section. If I try doing it elsewhere, I'll be moderated.
