Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
It's always "you assume things" when I put you in front of your contradictions Van. You don't like to lose. Too bad, neither do I.

But I have the merit of accepting when I'm wrong when it's necessary. You would benefit from that behavior, truly.



Spare me the strawman. Leftism can only be anticapitalism. It's a fundamental notion at the current stage of leftism.

Therefore, a cop, who is the weapon and defense of capitalism, CAN'T be on our side. If you can't understand the logic, I'm sorry. But it is what it is.

I already explained earlier this week that the call of nuance (especially coming from the right), is, in itself a very



Spare me the strawman. Leftism can only be anticapitalism. It's a fundamental notion at the current stage of leftism.

Therefore, a cop, who is the weapon and defense of capitalism, CAN'T be on our side. If you can't understand the logic, I'm sorry. But it is what it is.

I already explained earlier in this post the fallacy of the liberal "call of nuance"
>>
Its always insane how you harp on and on and preach to people, but never bother to read their posts or remember what they said. Looks like I have to repeat myself and explain things better than you(again).

The police are extensions of the system and enforcers of its laws--if the laws and system is messed up, what does that make the police? To be leftist is to be against the status quo, and to be a cop is to enforce the status quo, making police natural enemies of leftist. If leftist protest in the streets, who are always called to suppress them? The police. When black people marched for civil rights, who was called to suppress and arrest them? The police. When workers marched for better wages, who was called to shoot them dead in the street? The police. I'm fully aware, never denied it, and mentioned police oppression multiple times.
There's a difference between protests and riots. Protests are supposed to be disruptive, but they are usually organized with a specific goal. You have to disrupt the status quo to bring more attention to problems, and force those in charge to comply for the better of all. That's literally how worker unions started: from disruptive protests.

Riots on the other hand is just violent chaos. Completely disorganized violence that only harms the everyday people as their livelihoods shatter, making them more dependent on those in charge. There's a reason the media tries to make every protest seem as violent and chaotic as possible, and it's to justify police presence and suppression.
The problem is you always assuming someone's personal values. You always assume what someone would believe based on their experience and occupation for the sake of your argument. Your logic says anyone who has a job must have pro-capitalist values for fueling the system, and contradicts themselves if they are anti-capitalist in values. Another example:

Guy's personal values: pedophiles need to be put to death or at least suffer for the rest of their lives

Guy's job: make sure pedophiles are healthy and free of harm so that they can stand trial

You: he must have some pro-pedophile sympathies to do the job, making him [insert here] politically
 
Purely playing devil’s advocate here, but that’s basically what happened to Native Americans; they realized they couldn’t win against the colonizers, and their pacifism by and large led to their current situation - all but trapped on a few acres of the land their ancestors enjoyed to the fullest, shunned and mischaracterized by the people who stole said land from them, and relegated to second-class citizenship save a few casinos and perpetually dwindling government support…in absolutely no way am I supporting Hamas or any other extremist terrorist organizations, I’m just saying that I understand the motivation to keep fighting for what you believe is rightfully yours.
At what point are Israelis not native to the land? At the 100 year mark? Palestinians themselves are a mixed of many native groups including those outside of the Arab peninsula for example

if we can agree that the establishment of Israel was a huge mistake you have to agree that the destruction of it for Palestinians would be as well. We have to get past the endless wars and instead look to create sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza
 
Yeah.. No wonder. When you confuse geopolitical notions, you can only face big walls like me.

Colonialism is a specific form of domination. it's extractive, often exploitative with a racial aspect. It's a form of oppression linked to the premisses of capitalism and - at the moment - capitalism in big form. So no. I'll not play into your whataboutism.



It's always "you assume things" when I put you in front of your contradictions Van. You don't like to lose. Too bad, neither do I.

But I have the merit to accept when I'm wrong when it's necessary. You would benefit from that behavior, truly.



Spare me the strawman. Leftism can only be anticapitalist. It's a fundamental notion at the current stage of leftism.

Therefore, a cop, who is the weapon and defense of capitalism, CAN'T be on our side. If you can't understand the logic, I'm sorry. But it is what it is.

I already explained earlier in this post the fallacy of the liberal "call of nuance"
>>




There is no such thing as socialist (or communist) country on this planet. There are state capitalist country (china, north corea, cuba) but nothing more, at least for now.

And these are also communists in the most reactionary meaning of the world, meaning authoritarist country. I'm not advocating for authoritarianism, but anti-authoritarianism.



Not anarchism

That would rather be closer to a form of authoritarian feodalism (that you can find in mafia like organizations and stuff like that)



Laws are social norms that are categorized. We don't need laws to function as a specie. With need the basic need to be happy.

When those needs are met, the need to break the laws of the city or the social group will be highly diminished.



Yet it's marxist and other radical leftists who fight the most to change society and allow for the redistributions of ressources.

This morals and psychological factors are made up lies meant to make you accept a bad job in an alienating business in the hope that you will one day become a trillionaire.

That's why I often ask you: What are you waiting to be rich? If your will and moral is enough, you shouldn't have a problem to achieve this type of wealth.
I'm not sure what you are on about, but whatever...
Its always insane how you harp on and on and preach to people, but never bother to read their posts or remember what they said. Looks like I have to repeat myself and explain things better than you(again).

The police are extensions of the system and enforcers of its laws--if the laws and system is messed up, what does that make the police? To be leftist is to be against the status quo, and to be a cop to enforce the status quo, making police natural enemies of leftist. If leftist protest in the streets, who are always called to suppress them? The police. When black people marched for civil rights, who was called to suppress and arrest them? The police. When workers marched for better wages, who was called to shoot them dead in the street? The police. I'm fully aware, never denied it, and mentioned police oppression multiple times.


The problem is you always assuming someone's personal values. You always assume what someone would believe based on their experience and occupation for the sake of your argument. Your logic says anyone who has a job must have pro-capitalist values for fueling the system, and contradicts themselves if they are anti-capitalist in values. Another example:

Guy's personal values: pedophiles need to be put to death or at least suffer for the rest of their lives

Guy's job: make sure pedophiles are healthy and free of harm so that they can stand trial

You: he must have some pro-pedophile sympathies to do the job, making him [insert here] politically
It's a rare sight to see a cop talking openly about police oppression. Most cops I know are yes men that idolize the State. Your community is well protected.
 
Last edited:
At what point are Israelis not native to the land? At the 100 year mark? Palestinians themselves are a mixed of many native groups including those outside of the Arab peninsula for example

if we can agree that the establishment of Israel was a huge mistake you have to agree that the destruction of it for Palestinians would be as well. We have to get past the endless wars and instead look to create sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza
I doubt he’s pro Hamas, he’s just saying he understands their grievance
 
I know he’s not but at some point the constant wars become irrational
There’s no real incentive for peace.

the American economy is tbh more dependent on war than people realize. We spend hundreds of billions of dollars for defense. That money goes back into the economy, powering the military industrial complex.

A lot of people are dependent directly or indirectly on those contracts and some of those people are very influential.
 
But like understand that is what it is. You are talking about something so impossible that most people who believe in it believe it can only come about via divine intervention.
But like understand that is what it is. You are talking about something so impossible that most people who believe in it believe it can only come about via divine intervention.
When I say that understanding the world is liberating. I'm not joking. This only difference with religion is that we know how to do it. We are just stopped in our path by people who are to afraid to project.

I'll be very real with you. I have always dream about a Utopia. When I was 10 I was already creating drawing and poems about it and I went through the entire political and philosophical spectrum, with the exception perhaps of hardcore religious belief and real reactionnarism. This means that I know the difference between not knowing, and understanding a lot more.

What is see as a potential future is concrete, it's not a revelation, it's a project. Now. Will this be paradise? Perhaps not (I don't really hope so, or it will be boring) but will it feel like paradise compared to what we have now? Definitely.

It can seems scary because of what happen in URSS. But when we look on a bigger scale, capitalism is much scarier.
Its always insane how you harp on and on and preach to people, but never bother to read their posts or remember what they said. Looks like I have to repeat myself and explain things better than you(again).
:few:

Don't worry I won't preach for long. This forum is crumbling anyway.

leftist is to be against the status quo, and to be a cop to enforce the status quo, making police natural enemies of leftist.
Yeah... exactly. I completely agree on that.


if the laws and system is messed up, what does that make the police?
Everything?

I don't even know what to explain here.. Dudude, sometimes I feel like I'm speaking to a leftist, sometimes I feel like I speaking to a police union. It has everything to do with the police.

If the system is messed up, it means that there are people who are preventing other to change it, that would be :
- The ruling class
- The police (as the weapon of the ruling class)

Get rid of the police and change will happen a LOT faster trust me. On top of that, the Police is not just an instrument of the power, it also perpetuate multiple system of dominations on its own :
- Systemic racism
- Sexism
- Masculinism
- In some cases far rightism and political entrism with SHADY groups.

The police is an integral part of the problem, both as a repressive force and a perpetuation force of the dominations system in place.

And it's not just "the police", it's all the type of work related to this profession. Pretty much all will perpetuate the condition of oppressions for the marginalized and racialized people. All will work for the maintenance of the power and not against.

There is no such thing as an anti-capitalistic cop.

And that's why I talk about the values:

The police. When workers marched for better wages, who was called to shoot them dead in the street? The police. I'm fully aware, never denied it, and mentioned police oppression multiple times.
You are removing yourself from the equation. Like I said, we are not really on Worstgen, but G5.

You are playing Smoker right now. Perhaps thinking (pardon me the strawman) that "some cops can be good or usefull, that cops are not responsible for the system, only the system is bad".. But Smoker is a Marine and no marine will truly change the world. This is an idealist position.



The problem is you always assuming someone's personal values. You always assume what someone would believe based on their experience and occupation for the sake of your argument. Your logic says anyone who has a job must have pro-capitalist values for fueling the system, and contradicts themselves if they are anti-capitalist in values.
Guy's personal values: pedophiles need to be put to death or at least suffer for the rest of their lives

Guy's job: make sure pedophiles are healthy and free of harm so that they can stand trial

You: he must have some pro-pedophile sympathies to do the job, making him [insert here] politically
No. That's not what I think.

I know that there is something that is blocking the communication here. I don't know what it is exactly, but we always end up on the same point. I'll try to explain it one last time. Please, listen to me and don't try to twist it.

Yes. I do assume personal value. But it's not illogically and not in a normal way, but through a materialist and marxist way:

You know that we, Marxist (I think it's fair to call myself a new-marxist now) that we consider society in term of classes. Basically, there are two main class, you know them:
- The bourgeoisie: the ruling class that owns the means of production and acquires the added value of the proletariat
- The proletariat: the exploited class that sell its workforce to survive.

What does this paradigm create ? Class interests:
>The bourgeoisie will have an interest in keeping the propriety of the means of production, the state of capitalism and the exploitation of different classes of worker
> The proletarial will have the interest in raising its material condition (working condition for ex)

Through this lens, we also know that there are other forms of class , the small bourgeoisie, the state institution etc.
The police is part of the state institutions: It's a repressive form of proletariat and institution that works to maintain the ruling classes and capitalism, we both know that.

Because of its repressive nature, this institution holds the SAME interests as the ruling class : To survive, they must suppress the proletariat and its rights. They must keep private properties safe at all cost.

To do maintain this working force under its thumb, the ruling class has for only solution to justify itself through a set of beliefs and advantages:
- Meritocracy
- Individuality and all the myth surrounding poverty
- The diabolization of the opposition and alternative systems
- The natural order of the world and capitalism even in its weaknesses.
- A form of physical and real life domination over others
- Usually a form of racial profiling that blends everything

This also means that to maintain itself, the state, the state and the ruling classes WILL have to use the fascist or authoritarian button through the means of the police and judiciary forces at one point or another. That "button" will act as a self justification and will reenforce the power. > We can see it with Ice and the IDF.

Now, I've talked about the surface and capitalism, but there are ALLLLLLLLLL the other dominations systems too:
- How people like me are specifically targeted by the police, thorugh symbolic or physical violence
- How racialized people like you or monster are targeted systematically
- How the police is used as a form of suppression of ecological voices
- How fascism is rising FROM the police specifically
- How sexism and rape culture as a whole is perpetuated mainly through the police force and the justice system

etc.

The police has everything to do with the problems of society that they enable. But the institution is also at the center of the solution.

Get rid of the police ------->>>> get rid of the ruling class.

The police is not needed:
- Rapists are usually free
- Criminals are usually also free
- Prisons are overcrowed by racialized profiled people or small stuff.
- We have evidences showing that sentences have no effect on top of being oppressive structure meant to maintain a racial and capitalist power
- A lot of time, when the police is called, it creates more problem than it resolves and could actually be replaced by other organism of help or peerhelping.

Overall the police is a problem. It's what prevent me, you and everyone else to finally challenge the power.

So when I say "you can't be a cop and be a leftist". I'm talking about your class interest. You have NO interest in helping people like me raising in power and challenging your job, you have no interest in the power to crumble, you have no interest in letting a protest go by or let a person steal a bunch of food to survive in front of you.

You might let them, but you risk your job, your place, your position, your social power, your life basically.

I only hope that you don't find out by yourself the oppressive reality of the wall that you are protecting. Yes, there are good people in the police. But they can't be on my side as long as they stay on theirs.

As long as you are in the police, you are against people fighting the status co.

I'm sorry, but all our interactions here, the relationship of domination that I'm facing with you also, the lack of questioning of the current system, the enabling of problematic rethoric... All of this confirmes what I just said.

You may have some leftist knowledge or ideas, you may even become a leftist (and a good one I believe) in the future, but for the moment....

You are a cop, both IRL and on this forum, I'm sorry.

This is not a personal statement and I wish it was different.


At what point are Israelis not native to the land? At the 100 year mark? Palestinians themselves are a mixed of many native groups including those outside of the Arab peninsula for example
:few:

Ok I'm done for tonight.
 
When I say that understanding the world is liberating. I'm not joking. This only difference with religion is that we know how to do it. We are just stopped in our path by people who are to afraid to project.
.
This is just a secularized religion. You are framing your ideology as the absolute truth and the path to salvation, demanding obedience in order for people to reach salvation.
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
At what point are Israelis not native to the land? At the 100 year mark? Palestinians themselves are a mixed of many native groups including those outside of the Arab peninsula for example

if we can agree that the establishment of Israel was a huge mistake you have to agree that the destruction of it for Palestinians would be as well. We have to get past the endless wars and instead look to create sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza
That’s a fair point, several generations have passed so there are definitely “native” Israeli Jews…and yes, like I mentioned before, I’m not terribly keen on the idea of a full abolition that leaves my people high and dry, but getting nations to stop going to war with each other is a much taller task :moonwalk:
 
That’s a fair point, several generations have passed so there are definitely “native” Israeli Jews…and yes, like I mentioned before, I’m not terribly keen on the idea of a full abolition that leaves my people high and dry, but getting nations to stop going to war with each other is a much taller task :moonwalk:
Feel like the best compromise would be if Israel-Palestine had a joint government with a system similar to Lebanon

- prime minister has to be jewish
- president has to be Palestinian Muslim
- vice president has to be Palestinian Christian
-etc.
Post automatically merged:

But like I’m unsure if either side wants that and I don’t think outsiders can engineer a compromise. They need to sort it out themselves
 
Last edited:

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
Don't worry I won't preach for long. This forum is crumbling anyway.
OK and? Most forums are doomed to fail no matter what action is taken.


Everything?

I don't even know what to explain here.. Dudude, sometimes I feel like I'm speaking to a leftist, sometimes I feel like I speaking to a police union.
You're confused because you keep relying on assumptions that often contradict what I say and believe

If the system is messed up, it means that there are people who are preventing other to change it, that would be :
- The ruling class
- The police (as the weapon of the ruling class)

Get rid of the police and change will happen a LOT faster trust me. On top of that, the Police is not just an instrument of the power, it also perpetuate multiple system of dominations on its own :
- Systemic racism
- Sexism
- Masculinism
- In some cases far rightism and political entrism with SHADY groups.

The police is an integral part of the problem, both as a repressive force and a perpetuation force of the dominations system in place.
When I said "when the system and laws are messed up, what does that make the police?", it was rhetorical. It was obviously saying the police are enforcers of a messed up system and laws.

There is no such thing as an anti-capitalistic cop.
Not true. There are/were cops in non capitalist nations.



You are removing yourself from the equation. Like I said, we are not really on Worstgen, but G5.

You are playing Smoker right now. Perhaps thinking (pardon me the strawman) that "some cops can be good or usefull, that cops are not responsible for the system, only the system is bad".. But Smoker is a Marine and no marine will truly change the world. This is an idealist position.
Not removing myself nor am I playing Smoker. I never once said nor implied that cops are not responsible for the system. You are assuming again.



Yes. I do assume personal value. But it's not illogically and not in a normal way, but through a materialist and marxist way:
And almost all of your assumptions about my values have been wrong.

You know that we, Marxist (I think it's fair to call myself a new-marxist now) that we consider society in term of classes. Basically, there are two main class, you know them:
- The bourgeoisie: the ruling class that owns the means of production and acquires the added value of the proletariat
- The proletariat: the exploited class that sell its workforce to survive.

What does this paradigm create ? Class interests:
>The bourgeoisie will have an interest in keeping the propriety of the means of production, the state of capitalism and the exploitation of different classes of worker
> The proletarial will have the interest in raising its material condition (working condition for ex)
Oh hey I also believe that class war is the biggest thing. I've said that multiple times. How often have I spoken against the rich and capitalist exploitation? I've lost count

The police has everything to do with the problems of society that they enable. But the institution is also at the center of the solution.
EYYYYYY something I never denied or spoke against

Get rid of the police ------->>>> get rid of the ruling class.

The police is not needed:
- Rapists are usually free
- Criminals are usually also free
- Prisons are overcrowed by racialized profiled people or small stuff.
- We have evidences showing that sentences have no effect on top of being oppressive structure meant to maintain a racial and capitalist power
- A lot of time, when the police is called, it creates more problem than it resolves and could actually be replaced by other organism of help or peerhelping.
Police are very mandatory in the current state of affairs thank you.

So when I say "you can't be a cop and be a leftist". I'm talking about your class interest. You have NO interest in helping people like me raising in power and challenging your job
Assumption

, you have no interest in the power to crumble,
Assumption and contradicts what I said

you have no interest in letting a protest go by or let a person steal a bunch of food to survive in front of you.
I bought food for a homeless thief while on the job so yet another assumptions from you

You might let them, but you risk your job, your place, your position, your social power, your life basically.
You assume I give a shit about losing my job or social power among stranger colleagues? Lol

I only hope that you don't find out by yourself the oppressive reality of the wall that you are protecting. Yes, there are good people in the police. But they can't be on my side as long as they stay on theirs.
"Police are enforcers of the status quo and enemies of leftist"
"The first organized Police forces in the US were created to catch slaves and imprisone black people"

You just keep ignoring what I say?

As long as you are in the police, you are against people fighting the status co.
How often are you gonna repeat what I said?

I'm sorry, but all our interactions here, the relationship of domination that I'm facing with you also, the lack of questioning of the current system, the enabling of problematic rethoric... All of this confirmes what I just said.
"Lack of questioning of the current system"
Yeah you definitely have short term memory...

You may have some leftist knowledge or ideas, you may even become a leftist (and a good one I believe) in the future, but for the moment....

You are a cop, both IRL and on this forum, I'm sorry.

This is not a personal statement and I wish it was different.
Unnecessarily cheesy
 

Jew D. Boy

I Can Go Lower
Feel like the best compromise would be if Israel-Palestine had a joint government with a system similar to Lebanon

- prime minister has to be jewish
- president has to be Palestinian Muslim
- vice president has to be Palestinian Christian
-etc.
Post automatically merged:

But like I’m unsure if either side wants that and I don’t think outsiders can engineer a compromise. They need to sort it out themselves
Is that really how Lebanon does it?? That actually makes a great deal of sense, I could be into a system like that…:bamathink:
 
@Uncle Van sounds like such conscious cop.

What’s your rank ? If you want to keep the mystery then : Is it high or low from 1 to 10 and 10 is chief of police.

Is that really how Lebanon does it?? That actually makes a great deal of sense, I could be into a system like that…:bamathink:
Yes they kinda do that but is this even a secular state when you do this ? They do this multi confessionnal thing but have hezbollah too…
 

Uncle Van

Monké Don't Do Taxes
@Uncle Van sounds like such conscious cop.

What’s your rank ? If you want to keep the mystery then : Is it high or low from 1 to 10 and 10 is chief of police.



Yes they kinda do that but is this even a secular state when you do this ? They do this multi confessionnal thing but have hezbollah too…
If 6-10 are leadership positions, then 5. I avoid leadership spots like the plague.
 
This is just a secularized religion. You are framing your ideology as the absolute truth and the path to salvation, demanding obedience in order for people to reach salvation.
I understand. While there is no "absolute truth" in this case, intersectionnal materialism is the framing that allows us the best to understand the world at the moment. The rest is not really viable. See it as leftist having the picture of the entire picture of the puzzle in mind, in the big shapes, while we are all trying to find the pieces and build. It's a attempt of persuasion yes, but a necessary one.


That’s a fair point, several generations have passed so there are definitely “native” Israeli Jews…and yes, like I mentioned before, I’m not terribly keen on the idea of a full abolition that leaves my people high and dry, but getting nations to stop going to war with each other is a much taller task :moonwalk:
The problem is that settler colonialism, in all cases is passed on even after people are born on the land. It's a form of exploitative and extrative domination, so what was created by ancestor is still happening and still make people on the land colonist. Be it in US or Israel. That's why the only way to stop it, is the path of full reparation and acceptation of the situation.


OK and? Most forums are doomed to fail no matter what action is taken.
And. I don't want to accept that. Forum are crumbling because of their own toxicity, not because of the subjects they are talking about.

Basically is like saying "so yeah a man with a virus is dying... so what?" Welll.... get the virus under control if you wanna save the man!

:luuh:

It feels like despite being the one that criticized it the most, I'm the only one who really want(ed) to save this forum


You're confused because you keep relying on assumptions that often contradict what I say and believe
No, this means that you have contradicting beliefs or knowledge at least and you don't see that. And you can tell me "you make assumptions" all you want. I had the SAME contradicting beliefs/knowledge, so I know that at one point they gotta align

Not true. There are/were cops in non capitalist nations.
There is no such thing as non capitalist nations. All nations, even communists ones are partly capitalist or autoritarian. Communism doesn't exist on this planet as a complete and functionning system for the moment. So cops are used for the state and capitalists interest, just like other capitalists states.

Not removing myself nor am I playing Smoker. I never once said nor implied that cops are not responsible for the system. You are assuming again.
EYYYYYY something I never denied or spoke against
Ok so you are agreeing with me then? Why are we fighting? Why are you constantly contradicting me if you agree with me that cops are part of the problem and responsible in the systemic oppression of people?

And almost all of your assumptions about my values have been wrong.
if only


Oh hey I also believe that class war is the biggest thing. I've said that multiple times. How often have I spoken against the rich and capitalist exploitation? I've lost count
yeah I know. I had a lot of contradicting stuff in my mind too when I was young


Police are very mandatory in the current state of affairs thank you.
Nah, there are ways to deal without the police.


It's called class interest. It's basic marxism dude. It's like saying "billionnaire have the interest to stay rich". This is not an assumption it's a material reality. It's a very cold analysis to be honest, I'm not even talking about your values or anything else here, simply the basic interest that come with this class. Unless you tell me that you are on your way out and things could be different then.


Assumption and contradicts what I said
Nah, I'm only stating the current material reality of what is the police, nothing more. It contradicts what you believe, yes (and it's good). But that's not because of me. I'm not responsible for this contradiction.


I bought food for a homeless thief while on the job so yet another assumptions from you
Good, so you are already in the phase where you are actively contradicting the interest of your own class. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this is not something you learned to do in the police, right?

You assume I give a shit about losing my job or social power among stranger colleagues? Lol
Losing a job.... is part of the deal. You are not alone in protecting the interest of the ruling class. Which means that going against this, (for ex helping thieves) will create conflict, will make you risk your job, will make your risk your social circle and social status. This is what happens when we contradict our own class interests or the social normal of our in-groups. We all have the interest to keep that. Unless..


You assume I give a shit about losing my job or social power among stranger colleagues? Lol
You don't care about keeping that job.....


"Police are enforcers of the status quo and enemies of leftist"
"The first organized Police forces in the US were created to catch slaves and imprisone black people"

You just keep ignoring what I say?
>>>
Police are very mandatory in the current state of affairs thank you.
:luuh:


How often are you gonna repeat what I said?
This?
>>
Police are very mandatory in the current state of affairs thank you.
Or this ?
>>

"Police are enforcers of the status quo and enemies of leftist"
One contradicts the other if you wanna change the world and be a leftist, so you tell me. Which one do you keep?

:catsure:


"Lack of questioning of the current system"
Yeah you definitely have short term memory...
I mean... yeah it's true, but you certainly have an amazing ability to deal with contradicting thoughts.

I would not be able to deal with that myself. I need things to be coherent.


Unnecessarily cheesy
Yeah if you want... but it's true. You have everything to be an even better leftist than I am. With your knowledge, you could transform this forum in a heartbeat if you let that baseless assumptions of leftists like me go.

I'm did not focus on you specifically for no reason. I know that you have an amazing potential. (here, i made it even more cheezy)

:yodaswag:
 
Feel like the best compromise would be if Israel-Palestine had a joint government with a system similar to Lebanon

- prime minister has to be jewish
- president has to be Palestinian Muslim
- vice president has to be Palestinian Christian
-etc.
Post automatically merged:

But like I’m unsure if either side wants that and I don’t think outsiders can engineer a compromise. They need to sort it out themselves
Based on what you say that? Pretty sure no Israeli wants that. And probably no Palestinian. This makes no sense and would be a terrible idea.

I don't have a solution for that and don't understand why Palestinians can't build their state. I'd guess there are a lot of interesting to keep that area as an eternal warzone but I don't know exactly why.
 
Top