Controversial General Political Discussion
- Thread starter AL sama
- Start date
- Tags #freepalestine are you having fun al? are you having van al? dei has never hurt anyone you jackass dei must go gaolang > your fav hi rej hi rejj hi rejjj is not paying tax sexist is van having fun al? life goal sister harem real madrid reloaded is innocent tax is the best thing ever happened to us trans rights = human rights trans women are not interested in any of you watch for haters weebs discussing politics lmao worst thread ever
You are correct to certain extent.
Karl did say - change can occur peacefully in some cases, however, I would add that Marx believed revolution or use of force is inevitable because there would be resistance from the ruling class.
He didn't preach for violence. He didn't see violence as a goal or a mean which is always necessary.
But he endorsed its use. He even often used strong words regarding violence which makes his stance clear on the matter.
Obviously this isn't as extreme as what we saw later on.
Karl did say - change can occur peacefully in some cases, however, I would add that Marx believed revolution or use of force is inevitable because there would be resistance from the ruling class.
He didn't preach for violence. He didn't see violence as a goal or a mean which is always necessary.
But he endorsed its use. He even often used strong words regarding violence which makes his stance clear on the matter.
Obviously this isn't as extreme as what we saw later on.
Man I will just mention this here since we talked about transgender people and hormones a little bit ago
I said I really hate the idea of trt for men, just found out one of the side effects of trt can also be sleep apnea, worsening sleep, and sleep is the state when natural test is produced, crazy how trt completely destroys the body
I said I really hate the idea of trt for men, just found out one of the side effects of trt can also be sleep apnea, worsening sleep, and sleep is the state when natural test is produced, crazy how trt completely destroys the body
https://www.lloydslist.com/LL115665...g-corridor-for-approved-and-paid-for-transits
Iran is moving to formally regulate all shipping going through the strait now.
Iran is moving to formally regulate all shipping going through the strait now.
The latest attacks on Iran's oil infrastructure was a stupid move by US/Israel. This is a tit for tat war, and if you cannot take the consequences of the escalation, then don't escalate in the first place. Iran striking oil infrastructure in the Gulf and Israel causes trouble worldwide, and by Iran making sure its retaliating rather than starting the strikes on this infrastructure its winning the information war.
Now the US is talking about lifting sanctions on IRANIAN oil to relieve some of the shocks the strikes caused. Clown planning.
Last month, the Treasury's Secretary was talking about how sanctions were successful in hurting Iran's economy and leading to the protests in December: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dx2Pg4bKNxw?feature=share
I doubt any long term vision or planning was made regarding this war at all.
Now the US is talking about lifting sanctions on IRANIAN oil to relieve some of the shocks the strikes caused. Clown planning.
Last month, the Treasury's Secretary was talking about how sanctions were successful in hurting Iran's economy and leading to the protests in December: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Dx2Pg4bKNxw?feature=share
I doubt any long term vision or planning was made regarding this war at all.
Last edited:
Btw @Zenos7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_abolitionism
"Although some Enlightenment philosophers opposed slavery, it was Christian activists, attracted by strong religious elements, who initiated and organized an abolitionist movement.[1] Throughout Europe and the United States, Christians, usually from "un-institutional" Christian faith movements, not directly connected with traditional state churches, or "non-conformist" believers within established churches, were to be found at the forefront of the abolitionist movements."
Christianity is responsible for the abolitionist movement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_abolitionism
"Although some Enlightenment philosophers opposed slavery, it was Christian activists, attracted by strong religious elements, who initiated and organized an abolitionist movement.[1] Throughout Europe and the United States, Christians, usually from "un-institutional" Christian faith movements, not directly connected with traditional state churches, or "non-conformist" believers within established churches, were to be found at the forefront of the abolitionist movements."
Christianity is responsible for the abolitionist movement
"
In the fourth century, the bishop Gregory of Nyssa articulated a fundamentally Christian conception of the world that embedded a thorough rejection of the notion that one human could be owned by another and a condemnation of the institution of slavery. The historian Kyle Harper writes:
In the fourth century, the bishop Gregory of Nyssa articulated a fundamentally Christian conception of the world that embedded a thorough rejection of the notion that one human could be owned by another and a condemnation of the institution of slavery. The historian Kyle Harper writes:
Humans were granted mastery over the animals by God. But in practicing slavery, humans overstepped the boundaries of their appointment. Gregory proceeded to attack slavery by questioning, philosophically, the paradigmatic act of the slave system: the sale. With penetrating insight, he asked how the human being, the rational creation of God, could be given a "price." What, he asked, could have the same market value as human nature? "How much does rationality cost? How many obols for the image of God? How many staters did you get for selling the God-formed man?" Here Gregory offers a logic that was entirely novel in the ancient world but would reverberate in later centuries with tremendous consequence. "
I think it's more to do with elections and I am not talking about US midterm elections.
Iran proxy war through Hamaz and Hezbollah is not hidden from anyone. There's strong dislike for Iran in Israel. You can say popular sentiments is in favor of taking action against Iran.
Bibi has been advocating actions against Iran for a long time as well but his hands were tied.
This year Israel has legislative elections and survey was showing that Bibi's party was behind in polls.
I think war against Iran became a domestic political necessity for Bibi.
At the same time, Trump was on hot seat due to Greenland fiasco followed by Epstein files.
So perhaps both thought a campaign against Iran would help them more in elections.
But I don't think they expected Khamenei's death and Iran's hard stance which followed leading to Hormuz control.
Now, you can clearly see the difference in their stance.
Bibi says it was bound to a long term campaign while Trump who isn't so diplomatically tuned said it was weeks long campaign.
Short campaign is also evident from build up around Hormuz before war started. I doubt US can make such a strategic blunder if they were planning or were anticipating long campaign.
Iran proxy war through Hamaz and Hezbollah is not hidden from anyone. There's strong dislike for Iran in Israel. You can say popular sentiments is in favor of taking action against Iran.
Bibi has been advocating actions against Iran for a long time as well but his hands were tied.
This year Israel has legislative elections and survey was showing that Bibi's party was behind in polls.
I think war against Iran became a domestic political necessity for Bibi.
At the same time, Trump was on hot seat due to Greenland fiasco followed by Epstein files.
So perhaps both thought a campaign against Iran would help them more in elections.
But I don't think they expected Khamenei's death and Iran's hard stance which followed leading to Hormuz control.
Now, you can clearly see the difference in their stance.
Bibi says it was bound to a long term campaign while Trump who isn't so diplomatically tuned said it was weeks long campaign.
Short campaign is also evident from build up around Hormuz before war started. I doubt US can make such a strategic blunder if they were planning or were anticipating long campaign.
