Questions & Mysteries Does Zoro have Internal Destruction Haki?

Does Zoro have Internal Destruction CoA

  • Yes

    Votes: 28 28.9%
  • No

    Votes: 69 71.1%

  • Total voters
    97
But i just proved you wrong. He IS still using the same techniques that mihawk negg diffed.
Any changes to his move set are either due to his physical strength increase (36 < 360 pound ho)
Or cladding his moves in haki.
Again, it's not about the moveset. It's about improving the gracefulness of his Sword Techniques, which Mihawk was telling him was too heavy handed back on Baratie. That's what it means to refine his swordsmanship. Not that he needed to make it stronger. He needed to make it more graceful so his strength isn't wasted on sloppy technique.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Again, it's not about the moveset. It's about improving the gracefulness of his Sword Techniques, which Mihawk was telling him was too heavy handed back on Baratie. That's what it means to refine his swordsmanship. Not that he needed to make it stronger. He needed to make it more graceful so his strength isn't wasted on sloppy technique.
So apart from haki and zoro being stronger.
Tell me what was the difference between sanzen sekai vs mihawk and pica.

Go on tell me the difference in gracefulness lmfao
 
So apart from haki and zoro being stronger.
Tell me what was the difference between sanzen sekai vs mihawk and pica.

Go on tell me the difference in gracefulness lmfao
Do you think Mihawk would need an up close and personal named attack to cut Pica's Golem in half? Of course not. He could do it half a mile away with a single no named slash. Do you think that's because he's still so much more physically stronger than Zoro?
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Do you think Mihawk would need an up close and personal named attack to cut Pica's Golem in half? Of course not. He could do it half a mile away with a single no named slash. Do you think that's because he's still so much more physically stronger than Zoro?
Yes and his ryou is far superior.
 
Luffy only trained if after he unlocked it in an extreme situation. I e saving hyou.

So sanji fought okama luffy fough beasts and zoro the fighter fought noone ?
I see no problem in this.
Sanji did not get direction from the Okama. at least its not stated afaik.

the beast Luffy fought were sturdy. they required high AP moves to be taken out. that does not mean they were capable enemies or even a threat to Luffy. especially since he had his little safe spot on the island.
they are definitely not the same as fighting humans. they are still animals after all.

if it was anything like real life then Zoro spent most of his time training alone. and I do not mean alone as in there is no one near.
alone in the sense of following instructions and practicing. maybe Mihawk actively participated in Zoros practice, but I see no actual need for it. not to justify growth.
Zoro also tamed Enma without fighting anyone and thats supposed to be a really great progress for his haki.
 
Why is zoro still using the same techniques that got him negged then ?
Why was mihawks first lesson haki ?
Which baboon was the santoryu baboon ?
These are all good questions.
1) Because those techniques will be much stronger after he refines his swordsmanship.

2). Because Zoro was injured and couldn't do any physical training.

3). The third one from the bottom that walks with swag, and smokes cigars.

So I ask you again, why did Mihawk make it a point to comment on Zoros janky swordsmanship if it wasn't something that would eventually need to be addressed.

I also ask you why did Oda even put the baboons on the island and give them the unique trait of being able to mimic people and use weapons?
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
1) Because those techniques will be much stronger after he refines his swordsmanship.

2). Because Zoro was injured and couldn't do any physical training.

3). The third one from the bottom that walks with swag, and smokes cigars.

So I ask you again, why did Mihawk make it a point to comment on Zoros janky swordsmanship if it wasn't something that would eventually need to be addressed.

I also ask you why did Oda even put the baboons on the island and give them the unique trait of being able to mimic people and use weapons?
Btw thats a shit translation.
Mihawk never commented on zoros janky swordsmanship but said its ferocious
 
Btw thats a shit translation.
Mihawk never commented on zoros janky swordsmanship but said its ferocious
The implications are the same. This is what Stephen translated...

Zoro: I've never seen such a graceful sword.

Mihawk: There is no strength in a sword without softness.

Mihawk: What violent swords...

Mihawk says there is no strength in a Sword without softness, and called Zoro's swords violent. Ergo, saying there was no strength behind Zoro's swords because the technique was too violent.
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
The implications are the same. This is what Stephen translated...

Zoro: I've never seen such a graceful sword.

Mihawk: There is no strength in a sword without softness.

Mihawk: What violent swords...

Mihawk says there is no strength in a Sword without softness, and called Zoro's swords violent. Ergo, saying there was no strength behind Zoro's swords because the technique was too violent.
The first part is before hes even seen zoro fight so stop talking shit.
At no point does he reprimand zoros technique. Stop wasting my time cause you cant admit youre talking shit and have santoryu baboon fantasies
 
The first part is before hes even seen zoro fight so stop talking shit.
At no point does he reprimand zoros technique. Stop wasting my time cause you cant admit youre talking shit and have santoryu baboon fantasies
Yes, it was before that, and he said "There is no strength in a sword without softness."

Does the fact that he called Zoro's swords violent a minute later somehow negate his first statement? Like all of a sudden that sentence no longer applies to Swordsmanship?
 

HA001

World's Strongest Swordsman
Yes, it was before that, and he said "There is no strength in a sword without softness."

Does the fact that he called Zoro's swords violent a minute later somehow negate his first statement? Like all of a sudden that sentence no longer applies to Swordsmanship?
The comment on violent has nothing to do with that but mihawk wondering why zoro was fighting so hard



Zoros fighting style is no different now than back then talk, the only difference is he is stronger and has haki.
 
was it stated anywhere that Zoro sparred with Mihawk? afair not.

@PurpleSwordsman its a common mistake for Luffy wankers. not sure if you are one of those.
they tend to blow Rayleighs statement about haki out of proportion to justify putting Luffy on YC levels and above.
while haki can bloom in fights, it does not do so in every fight. nor is this the only way to advance it.

Luffy learned to use GK haki while doing basic training vs trees...

Zoro could have learned everything Luffy did and more during the TS without ever laying a hand on a single foe. Mihawk or Humandrill or w/e.
Why someone would need Rayleigh statement for putting Luffy on YC lvl? Luffy beat a YC1 lmao

Luffy set the foundation for the Advanced Haki against fodders and after that there were no more fodders for practice unless he does with his crew and people from the alliance... Ofc he will train against trees. But since when is better to train with trees than real rivals? lol

"Could", not "did".
 
Top