It doesn't work, it always leads to economic collapse. Companies could never sink due to losses, banks would lent to failing companies, everything depended on the state, then the state went into massive debt to maintain this somehow.
THEN you get inflation and shortages as a consequence. Then the economy collapses. And then you don't have food.
Perhaps you are looking at a system that would not work the way the system is structured now. This can't be 1 and 0. There is a transition period to create. Something that we have never experienced on the planet really..
What do you think about the reappropriation of the means of production by the workers?
Socialist countries often morphed into authoritarian regimes BECAUSE they needed to enforce economic control.
That's not wrong. This is the main reason why I'm not a real communist. but there are other solutions.
Maoism, Marxist-Leninism necessitates a one party rule. It's quite literally a feature of Marxism
There are more marxism than these two mate.
Yes, it's meant to enforce socialist policies efficiently and so it becomes dictatorial.
Why doesn't everyone know that
The dictatatorship of the proleteriat is only one of the solution that could lead toward socialism.
That's like saying capitalism cant work at all
It can't work at all
(although my reason is not really history rather than the structure of capitalism itself)
I eat pork kebab and vomit snails.
"the french way"
Gd Leftist crying a Dictator was taken down. They really have the biggest double standards ever.
Yet the country seems to be celebrating.
The right person does however need to fill the power vacuum. Hopefully it's done.
I guess commies love another commie. Blah blah blah
I guess you would not mind if China debarked in the US, with bombs and military forces to take out your political enemy leader and kill a few citizens?
You would be glad, am I wrong?