Search results

The only way to properly understand the manga is reading wrongly translated photoshopped magazine interviews of a One Piece editor's uncle's best friend.

The only one I'm taking lessons on Haki from is GOATbeer.

You need to have a deep mental retardation to try and reactionscale G5 of all characters in fiction.

Maybe if he focused on Luffy he wouldn't have failed his assassination like 3 times in a row.

I don't know where you got that Haa Zee bullshit but it's an outright lie they both just mean panting. It looks like some random ass discord log to me.

Why are people suddenly pretending that lightning is ACoC when it's been used a million times before Oda even introduced it. It's definitely not for lack of reading cause it's been everywhere so it's almost like they think if they lie enough it'll become true.

Did you already forget the part where he timeskipped an entire day, with the capture of York, the Seraphim and everyone's offscreened fights?

Do Sanji fans really think Oda knows what "COC" means?

You're supposed to read this right to left yo

It's pretty simple. Akainu gets embarassed? It's Plot. Luffy gets embarassed? It's a feat.

According to the manga panel, I find it very hard to believe that it's anything but a black blade. The actual question that should be asked is whether he forged it himself or whether he took it from someone he defeated/stole it.

Immune not, but definitely still incredibly resistant. Before, Haki attacks completly bypassed Luffy's fruit power, so if blunt attacks used to be reduced by say 99%, then that number decreased straight to 0% damage reduction with Haki. It seems with G5 he maintains some elasticity through Haki...

Zoro had a black blade but he didn't turn it into one. Dunno why the same can't apply here, there is literally zero proof on whether he is a swordsman or not, just conjecture, but the fact that so far he has not used his sword once but isntead fought purely with his devil fruit is already...

Swear to god this site argues with anything except the actual manga. Next thing you know you'll be quoting the one piece ice skating play to prop up Kuzan.

Do you even read the story? Zoro literally gives fucking funerals to the swords that are destroyed. "A Dead Sword", literally implies it's more than just a tool.

Actually all those times theh were talking about swordsmanship, and skill, and code of honour, they really just were talking about Haki and Advanced Conqueror's.

I feel like this was Oda outright answering the question and seetling it for good. It doesn't get any clearer. King is outright stated to not be a swordsman, because he doesn't fight using an arbitrary set of swordsmanship rules. However, at one point, he decides to humour Zoro and fight a...

Or it could've been, you know, fucking Shusui. Which the exact same thing happened to Zoro when he used it, pointing out how his flying slashes were way stronger and heavier.

Of course Swordsmanship is real.

That explosion is as big as the ship and Shanks is right fucking next to Kidd. If it was meant to do anything then his entire crew and not just Killer would've been hit, and Shanks was literally unscathed. It's just a flair explosion, to look cool.