That's because Marxism and Fascism are far-leaning ideologies, and far-leaning ideologies typically require/advocate for use of force.
Marxism(in general) is a far left ideology advocating for a revolution that leads to a dictatorship of the worker class, all to bring about a specific economic...
Reagan was the result of Nixon's and Carter's failures. Reagan layed the blueprint for the Republicans to run with ever since. Trump ran with it, and took it in all kinds of crazy directions to the point it became his very own blueprint.
They were actually very similar. It ain't all just about ideology and leaning(Conservative Neoliberal vs Far Right Populist), but about what they did and pushed for. Trump was always a more extreme version of Reagan even during his 1st term, and went completely into pure insanity during this...
Not really. Some can have amazing domestic policy but terrible foreign policy, obviously with the reverse being true. I just agree with the idea of building statues of people for something they specifically did when their other actions are questionable to terrible.
Robert E. Lee was good to...
It's crazy to compare 2 guys with the same slogan, mirroring policies, similar rhetoric, similar goals etc?
Difference is that Reagan wasn't a wannabe dictator and manchild, and so blatantly corrupted.
And things are terrible in Reagon's own country because of his trash policies and propaganda. It's not just his fault but he was a certainly an accelerator.
A person could save my life, but I'd still condemn him if he was an Epstein client.
If people are building statues of fucking Reagon of all people, you shouldn't be surprised of the Trump worship and leniency. Reagan walked so that Trump could run.
The amount of times he contradicts himself needs to be studied. On day he likes and agrees with all of my takes and in the next, disagrees when I repeat. He'll agree with textbook definitions but then deny them the instant they become inconvenient.
So you judge people are not thinking exactly like you. Nowhere is it stated that you have to make up definitions and greatly confuse people to be radical though?
There ya go. Not the actual leftism by definition and its historical context, but your personal version. So it is perfectly fine for...
See this here is a big showcase of your problem. I did no such thing. Nothing about what I said suggests or imply a connection between hate and being radical.
My posts are obviously critical about your assumptions about me that has been proven wrong and admitted by you time and time again.
And...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.