Seriously wtf. The amount of assumptions and victimization is just insane. People arent crazy or weird for not opening their doors to a jehovah witness who shows up everyday.
This.
This is an incredibly ignorant statement because it relies on assumption on so many levels. Many religions talk about the afterlife, and atheists know where they are going.
Its an extremely low hanging fruit statement.
This is also part of the issue. There isnt the slightest bit of...
True. Imo it is perfectly fine to critize the authenticity of religion, the hypocrisy of its followers, and its political connections. Hell, someone saying all religion is a scam is ok depending on context. Calling other religions false while promoting yours as the one true one is a different...
We censor anything that can fall under the category of "fucking crazy." lol. What Blax said was "fucking crazy." That's all there is too it.
But there's still levels and contradictions with it
Not really the same. Saying "your religion is trash" is whole different ballgame than saying "your political spectrum is trash."
Political beliefs should be rooted in facts which places those who don't use facts under scrutiny. Those who base their entire belief system on lets say...the...
No way to tell whether it will or not with absolution, but the likelihood increases as Trump gets clowned on more and loses momentum.
Trump and Israel thought the attack would be quick and easy like with Venezuela and didn't account for Iran actually having backbone.
Assuming I'm not too out of the loop and butting in like an asshole, but what's the problem?
If someone is criticizing the customs of Nigeria for example, there are leftist out there that will throw a fuss because Nigerians are minorities in the U.S. and France. They act like Nigeria operates...
That is not the advocacy for violence like most associate it with. As I said, many think of Stalin, Lenin, and the actual violent revolutions when they think of Marxism. They assume Marxist WANT violence and that the theory is about spreading violence. They say "They're Marxist!" in the vein...
Yeah Capitalism back in his day was absolutely F.U.B.A.R(fucked up beyond all recognition). Capitalism went through many revisions and modifications since then whenever it started to collapse.
Not the same as Leninism and the like. Marx still saw violence as an inevitability since exploitation...
In practice within the current and past landscapes yes. Capitalism is dominant on a global scale, and there's no way you can quickly implement massive overhauls of an entire economic system without force. But doing it by force guarantees significant social and economic unrest, prompting even...
:risisweat:
So many associate Marxism with violent extremism. Nowhere in Marxism/Karl Marx's work does it advocate for violence. It simply theorizes that the worker class will revolt and takeover after enough exploitation from the owner class. Communism doesn't advocate for violence either...
Had no goals relating to Socialism, had no actions to bring about or strengthen socialism, and flat out tried to eliminate socialism from the country.
Hitler himself said his movement had nothing to do with Socialism and the name was to get the people on his side.
Stalin was a leftist. But Hitler and Mussolini were objectively textbook far rightist.
Not true. Hitler and Mussolini were objectively right wing. Fascism and Nazism are far right ideologies by definition, and has nothing to do with the left.
Back then it was prbabaly taken as an attack on the religion itself. I dunno
Thanks for what? What I do???
Not in his version of the Bible. We are definitely uneducated and evil for actually reading the Bible I'm sure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.