Search results

No way youre really this dense bro, this is getting hilarious lmao. yes

You can, just look at the tabulated data of the result. Or you can simple use the search and find and search "+H". He considered a ABE_H+H model, which is basically homo sapiens having different ancestor than ABE (Archae, Bacteria, Eukaryotes including metazoans). You didnt get the whole...

It is not and i already explained it Not just the holes missing in evolution theory, but there exists conflicting studies against darwinian evolution such as some ERVs not existing in human but exists in chimp and gorilla, etc. Their proposed alternatives also dont have conclusive evidences...

I believe humans were created in their present form and i also believe that the current evolution theory is still a valid theory, so far. Both dont conflict with each other as it is not a fact. Also, you're still on this logical fallacy train What did i say? I say biologists think CA is an...

Ive met 3 so far that considers that possibility and i already cited it in my earlier response. They were Theobald, Michael Gilchrist, and Rob Knight. I'm pretty sure there are more if you spend your time scrolling through pages in credible scientific journal. And you're still on this kind of...

Well, it doesnt matter much if ERVs have nothing to do with homology anyway cuz the vocal points have already been adressed. Skepticism is always open in science (I mean youre an Atheist you should know it already), it doesn't matter if you have doubts because of your conflicting beliefs as...

It kinda is in principle as @BleakAsh said They found that humans, chimpanzees, and other nonhuman primates share the same exact spot of ERV insertion in the DNA sequence. Thus, they infer that it must be conclusive proof that we share a common ancestor with other primates. I promise you...

I myself never actually read the scientific paper in detail. But i remember it vividly i read it first from an article that quoted a saying from a Nobel Prize winner. I just did some quick research and i found out it's Ilya Prigogine, who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry twice. This is also...

Scientific papers will indeed be presented, i never claimed the opposite. But the first impression they give is most of the time limited to the abstract and the conclusion; unless you ask them for more details. You're also still ignoring about the fact that the forum has a good scientific...

You and he literally said science and religion DIRECTLY goes against each other. How come something be like that when it is still a controversial debate retard, are you backtracking now

I cited one reference that talked about web of life model. And i already adressed what web of life model mean. If branches stem from only on node/ancestor, that would not be called a "web" And the vocal point is that UCA is becoming more problematic, thus mistakingly taking it as if it is a...

Already adressed, and youre still deaf. Not that they straight up thinking of that. But they do imply possibility that might not be necessarily true, especially for the web of life mode. Exactly lmao,

You disagree when the evolutionists think otherwise lmao

Before 2010s, UCA is done qualitatively based on similartiy of DNA, morphology, fetus, etc. Professor Theobald started the first quantitative study about the reliability of UCA model using computational statistics. He did find that the probability of the UCA model being true is 10^2860 more...

You being deaf and disingeneously misinterpretating my points is a proof youre an atheist not because of genuine reason, but because of other motive As i said, these evolutionists, some of which are atheists said it remains controversial. They are scientific atheists because of genuine reasons...

thats why i said "self-claimed", youre so dense lmao. You didnt explicitly claim that, but your attitude does. Yea keep being deaf Evolutionists: It's still an open debate and remains controversial between the web of life and tree of life model Web of Life Model: every node can have a...

I also read that, difference being you're misinterpretating my point when my actual point is the fact that the UCA model is becoming more problematic, not specifically the model hypotheses proposed by the author. You can google that what scientific athesits mean, but they share a common...

usual concession by retarded self claimed scientific atheists that actually knows nothing about it

I did read that, youre just a moron Why are you quoting something that i already answered above. Theobald himself said it's still an open debate and remains controversial after that study of his. I also answered why this is the case supported by studies done by chinese and japanese biologists...

So now you're saying that these well-known biologists produce not-scientific papers lmao. One of them even has a h-index of over 80, when 60 is already considered exceptional. One of them is also a top 2% scientist. It's not something whether it supports not every mammal share the same common...