Search results

  1. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    I need proof that Kaido has beaten the other Yonko and Mihawk. That’s how these things work - Oda needs to show us a World’s Strongest beating everyone in that category:cheers: Funny how that works...
  2. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    Yo, so does this mean King Punch actually one shots Yonko? That's what was said about it, that means it's true right? And since it doesn't mention admirals, they're obviously fine.
  3. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    He does have the highest bounty, suggesting great skill at piracy. That’s a great point :zehaha: Edit: not to mention how he escaped imprisonment 18 times.
  4. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    As long as the same people who are pushing Killer’s statement also agree 100% with Mihawk’s title, I have no problem with it. It’s the inconsistencies that bother me (like I mentioned above)
  5. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    I’m talking about the people who invent shit like Pure Swordsmanship and translate “strongest” as “most skilled” only for Mihawk lol. They’re the ones who seem to be making the biggest deal about this.
  6. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    Probably the same part that Mihawk downplayers have understanding in strongest swordsman :kayneshrug: I’ve always felt that Kaido > Mihawk, but I’m arguing against the Yonko stans because of inconsistencies in when they accept character statements as 100% canon.
  7. Cyrus the Cactus

    Character Discussion "Kaido, the strongest pirate" - how valid are characters statements?

    Stephen Paul is a biased and untrustworthy translator according to @Erkan12 so we can’t believe it.
Top