completely missing the point and failing to answer again.
how is any of what you wrote NOT possible in a homogenous society?
its unnecessary to have, say, a turk living next door to understand the turkish.
nor does being homogenous imply a superiorty complex or aggression or whatever nonsensical thing nationalism gets confused with. which, btw, is also not an answer to the question and rather a deflection.
it may be hard to accept in todays propaganda driven ideology shitfest, but diversity is NOT a strength.
its at best endured or tolerated.
no matter what mental gynmastics you use to whitewash it.
do not get the wrong idea. I like foreigners and I like having direct access to different cultures and viewpoints.
I would still never try to delude myself that my country will be worse off with all of that gone.
[automerge]1627595635[/automerge]
what you describe i
@trav
i agree with your pov but that works in an ideal case.
in this world the resources and money arent distributed equally all around the world. same thing with talent and ability.
so if a highly qualified and talented person from a country tries to immigrate legally to a country with resources, wealth and more importantly ability to provide a better future than country 1 for its citizens, it would foolish to stop it because it disturbs the homogeneous nature of that society because he can bring in value by virtue of his talent and work in exchange for recieving a better future for himself and his family.
this is bleeding the country of origin dry.
its what is happening to Pakistan with doctors.
and its not like the west is unable to produce capable doctors.
both sides lose in the long run.
the Dalai Lama said it good in 2016.
people who seek asylum must return once imminent danger is gone. to help rebuild their own country.