Are you for or against immigration?

[Warchief Sanji D Goat]

As an immigrant myself, I'm not entirely against it as long as you follows the laws and live peacefully there in different countries. No reason for countries should close their borders unless the immigrants are some kind of threat.

 

[Sakazuki-Singh]

I'm for a very strict controlled immigration policy

Some countries are just too kind with immigrants and it penalizes honest immigrants [Hello, Europe]

 

[Mansex]

I'm for a very strict controlled immigration policy

Some countries are just too kind with immigrants and it penalizes honest immigrants [Hello, Europe]

As a German with Balkan origins (my grandparents immigrated to work in Germany), it's honestly frustrating to see in Germany how badly sometimes hard working immigrants are treated and how criminal immigrants get a free pass.

They are too kind to the wrong people.

 

[Orojackson Refugee]

Against refugees yes.

Fuck refugees. Fucking money whores who only want to sit down in country and eat for free from tax money.

Indeed. The only good refugee is this one
⬅⬅⬅⬅⬅⬅⬅⬅⬅

 

[RobertoTheOharaSurvivor]

yes but it depends on the country where views on it can be drastically different

 

[Blackbeard]

completely missing the point and failing to answer again.

how is any of what you wrote NOT possible in a homogenous society?
its unnecessary to have, say, a turk living next door to understand the turkish.
nor does being homogenous imply a superiorty complex or aggression or whatever nonsensical thing nationalism gets confused with. which, btw, is also not an answer to the question and rather a deflection.

it may be hard to accept in todays propaganda driven ideology shitfest, but diversity is NOT a strength.
its at best endured or tolerated.
no matter what mental gynmastics you use to whitewash it.

do not get the wrong idea. I like foreigners and I like having direct access to different cultures and viewpoints.
I would still never try to delude myself that my country will be worse off with all of that gone.
[automerge]1627595635[/automerge]
what you describe i

this is bleeding the country of origin dry.
its what is happening to Pakistan with doctors.
and its not like the west is unable to produce capable doctors.
both sides lose in the long run.

the Dalai Lama said it good in 2016.
people who seek asylum must return once imminent danger is gone. to help rebuild their own country.

There's a female country, no need to mention its name, that has a problem of lack of births, and because there are no men who solve it from its root, you find them resorting to the cowardly solution of opening the boarders for immigrants to kidnap their offspring and ideologize them on their whims for fear of an inevitable cultural change.

 

[Finalbeta]

Ok with it as long as it can be decently supported and depending on the reasons too however.

 

[AkainuTheGrimReaper]

I am for immigration but it literally depend on strength of nation. Obey the laws or get wrecked is pretty general sense of most nations in nutshell. Literally mean follow the laws or get kicked out.
If you disagree with laws, you have to complain the law makers.

Anti immigration parties increased in Europe which they are called far right parties by media since 2010s even though they are just aganist immigration. And European nationalism increase every year.

 

[Ballel]

a female country

What's that please🤔

 

[Sasparan]

No,not most of the time but taking too many immigrants is a no for me.

 

[IsaziSempi]

I'm ok with everything but Ukrainian refugee's.

 

[Sasparan]

I'm ok with everything but Ukrainian refugee's.

Are you against all the refugees or you are saying it for this specific situation.

 

[IsaziSempi]

Are you against all the refugees or you are saying it for this specific situation.

I'm kidding, I particularly don't support or admonish refugees. I do believe that refugees should obviously be allowed safe passage into any country in times of natural disaster. You're a monster otherwise.

 

[Sasparan]

I'm kidding, I particularly don't support or admonish refugees. I do believe that refugees should obviously be allowed safe passage into any country in times of natural disaster. You're a monster otherwise.

I agree that refugees should go to other countries and they should be sade but there needs to be limitations for that.
But some countries in Europe is refusing to take refugees sometimes.

 

[Adam 🍎]

But some countries in Europe is refusing to take refugees sometimes.

There is a difference between a refugee and someone trying to sneak in without any documents

- i worked on the border during immigration crisis

 

[Sasparan]

There is a difference between a refugee and someone trying to sneak in without any documents

- i worked on the border during immigration crisis

I am not talking aboutdocuments tho.
Countries agree to take how many refugees they want to take thats his things go.
But some countries only taking 50 refugees while there are so many others are suffering from the war.

 

[Adam 🍎]

But some countries only taking 50 refugees while there are so many others are suffering from the war.

Because countries have different options for supply and need. During immigration crisis hundreds of thousands flocked to Germany through most poorest regions of Europe, of course that strains manpower and supplies. Then there is the question of integration and overall workforce needed.

Countries agree to take how many refugees they want to take thats his things go.

How many refuges did Saudi Arabia take during immigration crisis? Or Iran? Or Egypt? Sudan? Pakistan?

Thousands were sent to Europe knowing full well Europe doesn't have the capacity to take everyone.


Immigration is a difficult thing, it is isn't simply hey hey come here.

 

[Sasparan]

Because countries have different options for supply and need. During immigration crisis hundreds of thousands flocked to Germany through most poorest regions of Europe, of course that strains manpower and supplies. Then there is the question of integration and overall workforce needed.


How many refuges did Saudi Arabia take during immigration crisis? Or Iran? Or Egypt? Sudan? Pakistan?

Thousands were sent to Europe knowing full well Europe doesn't have the capacity to take everyone.


Immigration is a difficult thing, it is isn't simply hey hey come here.

Countries can bring supply and need thats no issue we are not talking about some massive number but a considerable amount. Your priority should be taking childs and womans from the war until they can return.

 

[Adam 🍎]

Countries can bring supply and need thats no issue we are not talking about some massive number but a considerable amount. Your priority should be taking childs and womans from the war until they can return.

Priority of any nations is to secure the safety and needs of its own people first. Refuges are secondary, harsh truth but it is the way how it goes.

Not a single country will take so many refuges it starts hurting its local populace

 

[Sasparan]

Priority of any nations is to secure the safety and needs of its own people first. Refuges are secondary, harsh truth but it is the way how it goes.

Not a single country will take so many refuges it starts hurting its local populace

Yes i know they are secondary and i know that they are the minority and has to face so many difficulties. I know it because i know a lot of refugees and i see their difficulties by the first hand.
I guess we have to agree to disagree.