Powers & Abilities Can Law Slice Kaido (No CoA/ No Full Body CoA) in 2 using Full Haki Room

Can Law Slice Kaido in 2 using Full Haki Room

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 25.0%
  • no

    Votes: 54 75.0%

  • Total voters
    72

ZenZu

The only one who can beat me is me
I had no idea you could hear me talking???

Like the other guy, if you want to have a cordial discussion we can start from scratch ill welcome it. If you guys want to keep the petty insults coming keep going, ill ignore you from this point and you guys get your one last free shot if you want to keep stooping.

Let me know about that cordial convo
Figure of speech. And there's no convo to be had, I quoted you with an explanation, you already responded, you're either trolling rn or being disingenuous. What's worse is you were referencing last chapter like it didn't confirm that Kaidou's haki was the reason Law couldn't use shambles, not his natural durability.

It's not difficult to grasp to begin with, it's hard to have this debate without questioning someone's intelligence, assuming you're being genuine here. Without haki, durability doesn't mean anything to Law, he already proved it when he split seastone casually.

This is like asking if Luffy can stretch, if Robin can sprout arms, if Enel can produce lightning, and the list goes on. You're basically asking if Law's fruit can do what we already know it can do, which is ignore durability (haki aside). If you didn't know he has those feats that's one thing, but that doesn't seem to be the case as you've already been told these things.

If you want to change your premise to hardening only, then that's also another thing. But that's also not where you seem to be going with this when you say things like this:
Kaido doesnt need his haki to be that durable because he is a fucking beast.
Like being a beast or naturally durable has anything to do with why Law's ability wouldn't work on him lmao.
 
Figure of speech. And there's no convo to be had, I quoted you with an explanation, you already responded, you're either trolling rn or being disingenuous. What's worse is you were referencing last chapter like it didn't confirm that Kaidou's haki was the reason Law couldn't use shambles, not his natural durability.

It's not difficult to grasp to begin with, it's hard to have this debate without questioning someone's intelligence, assuming you're being genuine here. Without haki, durability doesn't mean anything to Law, he already proved it when he split seastone casually.

This is like asking if Luffy can stretch, if Robin can sprout arms, if Enel can produce lightning, and the list goes on. You're basically asking if Law's fruit can do what we already know it can do, which is ignore durability (haki aside). If you didn't know he has those feats that's one thing, but that doesn't seem to be the case as you've already been told these things.

If you want to change your premise to hardening only, then that's also another thing. But that's also not where you seem to be going with this when you say things like this:

Like being a beast or naturally durable has anything to do with why Law's ability wouldn't work on him lmao.
Why didn't Law just sneak attack Kaido while he was initially drunk?
 

ZenZu

The only one who can beat me is me
Why didn't Law just sneak attack Kaido while he was initially drunk?
Why didn't Law take out Doffy's heart and crush it instead of using counter shock on a defenseless Mingo? Why didn't Kizaru shoot Luffy in the head with a light beam instead of aiming for the tiny keys in Luffy's hands? Why didn't Akainu take Whitebeards head off instead of aiming for his body when he had a heart attack? Why didn't....
 
Nothing changed. The 35 who voted no, still need to visit their local doctor for a checkup.
Lol. Law said kaido's haki is too strong, not that kaido was currently using strong haki. The two are obviously different, BB once said in Impel down (iirc) that luffy's haki had gotten stronger despite him not showing any signs of haki, else he wouldve beaten Smoker. So, even if Kaido isnt using any haki, law still wouldnt be able to slice Kaido in two
 
Lol. Law said kaido's haki is too strong, not that kaido was currently using strong haki. The two are obviously different, BB once said in Impel down (iirc) that luffy's haki had gotten stronger despite him not showing any signs of haki, else he wouldve beaten Smoker. So, even if Kaido isnt using any haki, law still wouldnt be able to slice Kaido in two
what? How’s Kaido haki preventing him from using shambles. If he’s not using haki, the bias is unreal....
:milaugh:
 
what? How’s Kaido haki preventing him from using shambles. If he’s not using haki, the bias is unreal....
:milaugh:
Haki and devil fruit is a fictional abstract concept, it's not even exist in our very world, so you're expecting a logical answer why kaido haki prevents him from getting shambled is pointless, If oda want to make it that way, then so be it.

Law said kaido's haki is too strong, not that kaido was currently using strong haki. The two are obviously different
 
I did, it's not possible
Post automatically merged:
Man claims Law can’t cut Kaido because Haki. In a thread Kaido doesn’t have haki
:choppawhat:

Grow a pair and accept you're a bitch boy that's wrong. I'm sorry your pride can't be kept when you make accusations likes these
how are u claiming I’m making random accusations. When it canon Law can bypass durability with his slashes. Is Kaido defense magic??
 
Law cant cut Kaido, your fault realy for thinking his ability was more OP than you thought it was.
:kayneshrug:
Because of haki... Wow it’s amazing how many people refuse to actually read the “actual canon”. Idiots literally keep saying Law can’t cut Kaido because “HaKI”.

Kaido durability based on toughness. Laws slash ignore durability/toughness completely. What exactly hard to get? Since when was toughness a factor against spatial hax...
:laughmoji:
 
Man claims Law can’t cut Kaido because Haki. In a thread Kaido doesn’t have haki
:choppawhat:

how are u claiming I’m making random accusations. When it canon Law can bypass durability with his slashes. Is Kaido defense magic??
Baby baby baby! It's talking about armament and I don't think armament is the reason law can't move koido
Post automatically merged:

Unfortunately, Oda wrote "the ONLY counter" to DF ability is armament Haki.
Imagine not cladding yourself with armament and fools think armament is why you can't be moved
 
Top