Powers & Abilities Can Law Slice Kaido (No CoA/ No Full Body CoA) in 2 using Full Haki Room

[bennbeckman]

LMFAO

And ppl still on board.

LMFAO

And ppl still on board.

I assume you were one of the 47 like me that said No

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

Baby baby baby! It's talking about armament and I don't think armament is the reason law can't move koido

Post automatically merged: Apr 9, 2021

Imagine not cladding yourself with armament and fools think armament is why you can't be moved

Wait so invincible haki not a thing anymore or what? Barrier haki also only invincible at times

 

[Krusher1357]

Wait so invincible haki not a thing anymore or what

Dunno, ask oda. We know fuck all about top tier haki, I don't doubt the possibility of it being something slightly different

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

Dunno, ask oda. We know fuck all about top tier haki, I don't doubt the possibility of it being something slightly different

I’m mean if it’s haki at all, that kind of defeats the whole purpose of the thread.

But what about Kaido durability specifically. Allowing him to tank attacks that dnt factor in his toughness?! It’s illogical, literally doesn’t make any sense

 

[Krusher1357]

I’m mean if it’s haki at all, that kind of defeats the whole purpose of the thread.

But what about Kaido durability specifically. Allowing him to tank attacks that dnt factor in his toughness?! This literally doesn’t make any sense

Don't think law being unable to move kaido and bm has something to do with just armament. I think it's just the 'haki' /willpower in general. Kaidos overall will is stronger than laws, at this time. If it's as simple as that, it explains why law wouldn't be able to dice him in room

 

[Finalbeta]

Wats this mean?

Kaido's haki defence is likely too powerful for Law's DF to affect him in any major manner despite we don't bear firm proof of it.

 

[ZenZu]

Lol. Law said kaido's haki is too strong.

So, even if Kaido isnt using any haki, law still wouldnt be able to slice Kaido in two

Lmao you really just typed those two contradictory sentences out in one post. I'll let you figure out what's wrong here.

 

[mad monk]

Law even cut full armament Vergo in half, and here we are expecting hakiless Kaido to withstand it? Hmmm.... We need @5000 ng/dl or death to preach them the truth

 

[5000 ng/dl or death]

Law even cut full armament Vergo in half, and here we are expecting hakiless Kaido to withstand it? Hmmm.... We need @5000 ng/dl or death to preach them the truth

Vergo uses a plant and hits harder than Kaido who uses a seastone club



Or Maybe thats just Vergo being so fucking strong

or a combination of both

 

[Rekien]

Because of haki... Wow it’s amazing how many people refuse to actually read the “actual canon”. Idiots literally keep saying Law can’t cut Kaido because “HaKI”.

Kaido durability based on toughness. Laws slash ignore durability/toughness completely. What exactly hard to get? Since when was toughness a factor against spatial hax...
:laughmoji:

Why didnt he cut Kaido or Big meme then?

 

[Finalbeta]

Vergo uses a plant and hits harder than Kaido who uses a seastone club



Or Maybe thats just Vergo being so fucking strong

or a combination of both

Legends suggest Smoker is still suffering a stomachache after tasting Vergo's bamboo.

 

[Haoshoku]

Law's sword went through Kaido... like butter yet still can't slice him in 2.... Kaido doesnt need his haki to be that durable because he is a fucking beast. Luffy mentioned when he first lost how durable his scales were.

So CoA isnt being used (which is clearly illustrated) then what haki is being used? regardless Law is not slicing Kaido in 2

Ch 1009 Luffy used CoA to block Kaido's attack, point is that it's clearly being illustrated so Kaido isnt loading up on CoA

Ay yo man... you do realize that invisible CoA is a thing right? Koka was never the only way armament haki could be imbued with something, that’s been the case ever since it was first depicted on panel:

Spoiler

And Rayleigh literally described it as “an invisible armor”.

It doesn’t matter how durable Kaido is, he’s still getting diced without the requisite haki to protect him. Law’s amputate slash ignores natural durability. When seastone chains are getting diced via amputate what makes you think a defenseless Kaido isn’t ending up the same?

And the poll should be made public lmao, too many people capping at the Olympic level right there.

It's pretty simple i mean 41 people agree with me and 15 agree with you. Ill take those numbers any day

Also clear-cut ad populum fallacy right here ^

 

[imacub]

Lmao you really just typed those two contradictory sentences out in one post. I'll let you figure out what's wrong here.

How do you come with that conclusion lmao, i even gave you an example to make it easier to understand

BB once said in Impel down (iirc) that luffy's haki had gotten stronger despite him not showing any signs of haki, else he wouldve beaten Smoker.

This is literally a straightforward comparison
1. Law said Kaido's haki is too strong
2. BB said Luffy's haki had gotten strong despite luffy not using any haki

What can you infer? It could be:
Law said kaido's haki is too strong despite Kaido was not using any haki

Law saying Kaido's haki being too strong doesnt necessarily mean Kaido was activating his haki at that point. Haki won't dissapear even if the user doesnt use haki at one point in time, haki will be there as long as the user is still alive. This is further proven by manga facts
1. When kaido drunk, kaido most likely wasnt using any haki, and Law didnt take such opportunity
2. When Doffy wasnt using any haki, Law still couldnt be able to slice him in two

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

Why didnt he cut Kaido or Big meme then?

The same reason he doesn’t shambles them “haki” people can’t actually be this stupid can they

 

[bennbeckman]

Ay yo man... you do realize that invisible CoA is a thing right? Koka was never the only way armament haki could be imbued with something, that’s been the case ever since it was first depicted on panel:

Spoiler

And Rayleigh literally described it as “an invisible armor”.

It doesn’t matter how durable Kaido is, he’s still getting diced without the requisite haki to protect him. Law’s amputate slash ignores natural durability. When seastone chains are getting diced via amputate what makes you think a defenseless Kaido isn’t ending up the same?

And the poll should be made public lmao, too many people capping at the Olympic level right there.


Also clear-cut ad populum fallacy right here ^

So why wasnt the original plan for law to sneak attack kaido when he is drunk and not using haki and slash him in 2... and don't say plot?

Dont worry this will always be a part of the 2 way street conondrum.

Each side thinks the other side are a bunch of fucking idiots.

 

[Rekien]

The same reason he doesn’t shambles them “haki” people can’t actually be this stupid can they

He dosent shambles them because their haki is too strong, soo if he cant shambles them for the same reason why he cant cut them...its because of haki. Meaning Trashgar Law cant cut Kaido at all because he is too weak to do soo, his "hax" abilities that you all overhyped to oblivion are not as broken as you make them to be.

Who could have though...i was right all allong.....

 

[bennbeckman]

I can settle this by making an additional poll, and ill make it public as well

 

[Rekien]

I can settle this by making an additional poll, and ill make it public as well

DEWIT

 

[bennbeckman]

DEWIT

I did and your picture is not loading

 

[Haoshoku]

So why wasnt the original plan for law to sneak attack kaido when he is drunk and not using haki and slash him in 2... and don't say plot?

Dont worry this will always be a part of the 2 way street conondrum.

Each side thinks the other side are a bunch of fucking idiots.

I’m not saying you’re an idiot nor intended to, so if it came out that way I own up to it. But you’re simply incorrect about Law here, and yeah the answer to your question is circumstantially impossible i.e plot.