Powers & Abilities Can Law Slice Kaido (No CoA/ No Full Body CoA) in 2 using Full Haki Room

[bennbeckman]

I’m not saying you’re an idiot nor intended to, so if it came out that way I own up to it. But you’re simply incorrect about Law here, and yeah the answer to your question is circumstantially impossible i.e plot.

I wasnt calling you out you were pretty cordial about it, but if you read previous comments it's clear how each side of the coin views it.

Also made an additional poll to get the true clarification

Because of everyone giving that answer... this question is then is just a catch 22

 

[Finalbeta]

So far the manga is siding towards an unfavorable direction.

It seems like Law probably won't be able to until his power (probably haki foremostly if not solely) shall prove strong enough.

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

He dosent shambles them because their haki is too strong, soo if he cant shambles them for the same reason why he cant cut them...its because of haki. Meaning Trashgar Law cant cut Kaido at all because he is too weak to do soo,

Man so bias he didn’t even read the thread title before posting. It’s no haki Kaido moron, so “haki” can’t be the reason why here... now can it.
:laughmoji:
We really need to do something about letting just anybody post

his "hax" abilities that you all overhyped to oblivion are not as broken as you make them to be.

All this headcanon & literally not reading. Just to push headcanon about a cartoon

Who could have though...i was right all allong.....

Read the thread please this is more embarrassing the the first guy

 

[Rekien]

Man so bias he didn’t even read the thread title before posting. It’s no haki Kaido moron, so “haki” can’t be the reason why here... now can it.
:laughmoji:
We really need to do something about letting just anybody post
All this headcanon & literally not reading. Just to push headcanon about a cartoon


Read the thread please this is more embarrassing the the first guy

You dont even know hoe Law's abilities even work you morron LMAO, i will say again, trashgar law cant cut stuff with his abilities that he cant cut normaly using his sword, the ability only extends his reach at the cost of not "hurting" his opponent.

Thats what Oda confirmed for us, Law cant cut kaido's skin at all.

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

You dont even know hoe Law's abilities even work you morron LMAO,

Truly sad how bias can rot the brain.

i will say again, trashgar law cant cut stuff with his abilities that he cant cut normaly using his sword, the ability only extends his reach at the cost of not "hurting" his opponent.

Thats what Oda confirmed for us, Law cant cut kaido's skin at all.

Wow how’d u make claims of someone not understanding Laws abilities. Then go on an show u have no understanding

In canon Laws cut sea stone. If u read the story in any capacity you know is the hardest substance in the verse. So ur basically saying Law without his DF, can cut the hardest material in the verse. But not Kaido because “haki”, something banned in the thread title
:laughmoji:

 

[Krusher1357]

Because of haki... Wow it’s amazing how many people refuse to actually read the “actual canon”. Idiots literally keep saying Law can’t cut Kaido because “HaKI”.

Kaido durability based on toughness. Laws slash ignore durability/toughness completely. What exactly hard to get? Since when was toughness a factor against spatial hax...
:laughmoji:

yet again, if he can't move em bc haki then he shouldn't be able to slice em in half either. It's CoC cladding not CoA cladding. The thread states CoA, not CoC

 

[Worst]

I don't think CoA is the problem but the haki itself, like Kaido's haki is so strong that Law's power can't bypass that so i don't think, he said he couldn't move them because of their haki but it's not like they were trying to portect themselves from law moving them it was just their haki so strong that law couldn't do sh** i think that's the limit of Law's df is someone's haki is >> his he can't use his df offensively at his full potential

 

[Rekien]

Truly sad how bias can rot the brain.

Wow how’d u make claims of someone not understanding Laws abilities. Then go on an show u have no understanding

In canon Laws cut sea stone. If u read the story in any capacity you know is the hardest substance in the verse. So ur basically saying Law without his DF, can cut the hardest material in the verse. But not Kaido because “haki”, something banned in the thread title
:laughmoji:

When did Law cut a full blown block of seastone? And when did Kaido mentions his skin to be impenetrable due to haki like big mom's?
Yet its a fact he cant pierce kaido's skin, as we have seen this chapter LMAO.


Stop being a stupid monkey and take your L.

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

yet again, if he can't move em bc haki then he shouldn't be able to slice em in half either. It's CoC cladding not CoA cladding. The thread states CoA, not CoC

Ask the user specifically. His intent is specifically NO HAKI. I know because the thread was create off our convo. Hes asking Specifically about Kaido “Durability” vs spatial manipulation. It arguably one of the dumbest convo I’ve been in.

Ur argument itself headcanon. So not much to take away from it.

Post automatically merged: Apr 9, 2021

When did Law cut a full blown block of seastone?

This what I really dnt get about u clowns. We all have access to the same manga. Did u sleep all of PH[/QUOTE]

And when did Kaido mentions his skin to be impenetrable due to haki like big mom's?

smh what??

Yet its a fact he cant pierce kaido's skin, as we have seen this chapter LMAO.


Stop being a stupid monkey and take your L.

Amazing actual proof finally. Dumbass can’t tell the attack on Kaido this chapter doesn’t bypass durability. The thread specifically talking about amputee an ability “that bypasses durability”. Bias is a Poison

 

[Krusher1357]

Ask the user specifically. He intent is specifically NO HAKI, he asking Specifically about Kaido “Durability” vs spatial manipulation. It arguably one of the dumbest convo I’ve been in.

Ur argument itself headcanon. So not much to take away from it.

Go reread chapters 1009 and 1010 please

 

[bennbeckman]

The original argument was Kaido not applying any CoA. Ch 1009 changes things around

Ch 1009: Is that CoA or CoC, what type of Haki is that? Invisible CoA, Invisible CoC,

 

[Finalbeta]

The defence against DF hax is most likely constituted by opposing against it rather than it being a granted. I see a different misconception being too spread overall.

 

[Trafalgar_D_Law]

Go reread chapters 1009 and 1010 please

Again what relevance does it actually have


beside there’s no evidence it’s not CoA...

 

[Krusher1357]

Again what relevance does it actually have


beside there’s no evidence it’s not CoA...

What relevance does your bullshit have? None there's no evidence it is CoA. your own points are your downfall lol. You are officially 2 hectic 4 me

 

[Warchief Sanji D Goat]

One more time, Law could have cut Kaido in half if he's not on guard or anything like that. In Dressrosa, Law managed to move Doffy for a bit but that's because Doffy wasn't aware of Law's attacks.

 

[Finalbeta]

One more time, Law could have cut Kaido in half if he's not on guard or anything like that. In Dressrosa, Law managed to move Doffy for a bit but that's because Doffy wasn't aware of Law's attacks.

That has been my argument for an entire week but some users would not comprehend probably.

Big Mom obviously put resistance against being teleported. Or at least why would not she.