Powers & Abilities Could old Garling have a black blade?

#1
Young Garling obviously didn’t have one. But like 40 years has passed since God Valley.

Since then, Garling became supreme commander of the god knights and now Gorosei. He obviously got stronger.

Personally, I think he should have one. Don’t think it makes sense for the black blade to be exclusive to Mihawk, Ryuma, and maybe GB.
 
#5
the fact that PK doesn't have a black blade should tell you that it's not about being stronger. it's about skill.

cause mohawk himself puts him below pk and his rival.
It tells me non-WSS, non-black blade user Roger wasn't strong enough.

Also Mihawk doesn't put himself below PK and his rival, but I'm not going through that conversation for the 1000th time, so don't bring that point to me, enjoy the thread about that if you want to.

Mihawk is factually above Roger's mid-gen stand-in Shanks.

PD: I re-read the post that you were quoting and I didn't even claim Mihawk was stronger than any of them in it, I just claimed "better". So I'm not allowed to call the called "strongest", stronger, but I'm also not allowed to call the called "more skilled", better? Get out of here.
 
#10
No, the only person that could have a Black blade in the future is Rocks if he wielded one. Otherwise, only Mihawk & Ryuma. Garling should be below his son Shanks do doesn't have one.
 
#15
Haven't we already seen his blade ?
The family of Shanks won't have one, they'll have the same fighting style. Garling and Shamrock having a fruit only means Gryphon does too.
 
Top