Let’s remember what the argument was from the beginning
A: -Shanks is a swordsman therefore he is weaker than Mihawk
B: - Are toi saying that Mihawk is Yonko level? Are you insane??! Anyway Shanks is not a swordsman
A: -He is rival to Mihawk
B-Shanks use haki and swordsmen did not therefore he is not a true swordsman. Out of here with your wanking!
*We see Zoro used Haki*
A: So...
B: -Shanks has another fighting style!!!
A: -Which is ?
B: -We need to see Shanks fight at full power to know. If he fights at full power with a sword he is a swordsman. But it is obvious that he is not just a swordsman
*We see Roger fought his strongest rival and his equal with a sword, we even seen him used a named attack with a sword *
A: -So...
B: -Roger is not a swordsman!!!
A: -But you said that if someone fight at full power with a sword he is swordsman...
B-Yeah but even if you fight at your full power with a sword you could not be a swordsman!!
Moving the goal post everytime, every god damn time.
i admit that I did not saw the last argument coming tho
At this point it is like arguing with someone who says that Ostriches are not birds because they cannot fly