Questions & Mysteries Did Sanji bend King's Beak

Did Sanji bend King's Beak


  • Total voters
    77
Status
Not open for further replies.

Calypso

"It is warm within the mansions of Hel"
Lol no?

Are you so desperate about some new sanji threads?
Even if.. how should he do that? I just clinged at the beak and cried like a bitch. He didn't do anything.​
 
You have already lost this argument by asking a logically fallacious question.
:cheers:
Your logical fallacy is based on points other Zoro Boys have tried to convey Acoa vs Daz Bones.... ive never discussed that topic nor give a shit about it...see the difference... Ill answer that... you definitely dont

Still with no explicit proof, the jury finds that Sanji did not bend the beak
Post automatically merged:

That Morgan is a fucking albatros, so there is no stylistic choice, pteradons have straight beaks. Mfers are you legit retarded?
pot calling kettle unintelligent, you must've missed the clear pictures of the beak having different shapes
 
@GreenEggsAHam I misread your comment as the other Morgan from our previous convo so my bad on that response

There are clear illustrations proving the point of stylistic beaks
Post automatically merged:

@BakiDou look at all these retards man
Still waiting on the proof that states Sanji explicitly bent the beak... we're waitinggggggggggggggg, since you guys are so conviced Sanji 100% bent the beak, you should have no problem finding explicit proof..... LOLOLOLOLOL
 
That Morgan is a fucking albatros, so there is no stylistic choice, pteradons have straight beaks. Mfers are you legit retarded?
Except right from the get go Oda drew King with a bent beak. There has ALWAYS been a curve to his top beak. This is what you aren't getting. Your profile image is an example of what an exaggerated stylistic drawing looks like. It's NOT always that exaggerated. In fact, there are other scenes where his beak looks less bent lmao.

Oda made zero indications that Sanji hurt King. No bruising, no actual bent "ripples" or "rolls" indicating the beak is bent out of shape. No blood. No outwardly obvious damage.Absolutely zero scenes that depict King even cared about Sanji after the fact, unlike Sanji who was on the floor clutching his stomach.

Like my example with Morgans is the fact that his bent beak is NOT consistent at all. It's sometimes way less exaggerated. From the front it's not "bent" at all.

This is sad bro, stick to your 2 panels of vergo wank, at least that's where your niche lies.
 
The beak is definitely bent, or at least this is how oda draws it, the question is why? Those panels with the weird beak appeared especially after he smashed with sanji in that tower. Dunno about some of you, but this is actually a rly good reason to argue.
If its true, huge L for Ling.:steef:
Vergo still the only one who can beat Sanji in nw.

5000 ng/dl or death those nibbas are trolling, Ling trolled himself when he tried to hit Sanji.:steef:
 
1-No, nothing sugests King's beak got bent as no one at all ever comments on it.
2-If his beak bended, it wasnt Sanji, it was the raid suit as Sanji himself was incapable of doing anything to prevent King from ramming him into the building, in fact if it wasnt for the raid suit Sanji would be heavy injured at the very least.
 
Except right from the get go Oda drew King with a bent beak. There has ALWAYS been a curve to his top beak. This is what you aren't getting. Your profile image is an example of what an exaggerated stylistic drawing looks like. It's NOT always that exaggerated. In fact, there are other scenes where his beak looks less bent lmao.

Oda made zero indications that Sanji hurt King. No bruising, no actual bent "ripples" or "rolls" indicating the beak is bent out of shape. No blood. No outwardly obvious damage.Absolutely zero scenes that depict King even cared about Sanji after the fact, unlike Sanji who was on the floor clutching his stomach.

Like my example with Morgans is the fact that his bent beak is NOT consistent at all. It's sometimes way less exaggerated. From the front it's not "bent" at all.

This is sad bro, stick to your 2 panels of vergo wank, at least that's where your niche lies.
Sanji did not comment on Vergo trolling him. Vsually we saw how he did it. I guess Sanji's face said as much :)

Visually we see what the fuck is going on. No, the beak wasnt so bent originally. now its bent shape is very conspicuous lol

But Oda can choose to delay this reaction from King because we actually later get some context for how Sanji could've achieved this, ie through his hardening defence. Sanji chose not to harden up against Black Maria because he would hurt her if he did. If Oda would've laid out how King got his beak bent, that scene wouldn't have been as impactful and surprising.

That's just one example why he perhaps didn't want King to call out what had happened to us, the readers. He can have other reasons, what the hell do you or I know? All I know is what I see lol. You expect to see blood and bruises, wtf lol. You're riddiculous

@BakiDou yeah very lowlife shit lol
 
Sanji did not comment on Vergo trolling him. Vsually we saw how he did it. I guess Sanji's face said as much :)

Visually we see what the fuck is going on. No, the beak wasnt so bent originally. now its bent shape is very conspicuous lol

But Oda can choose to delay this reaction from King because we actually later get some context for how Sanji could've achieved this, ie through his hardening defence. Sanji chose not to harden up against Black Maria because he would hurt her if he did. If Oda would've laid out how King got his beak bent, that scene wouldn't have been as impactful and surprising.

That's just one example why he perhaps didn't want King to call out what had happened to us, the readers. He can have other reasons, what the hell do you or I know? All I know is what I see lol. You expect to see blood and bruises, wtf lol. You're riddiculous

@BakiDou yeah very lowlife shit lol
So no proof and just speculation at this point?

The BM incident Sanji explicitly says that though which is why we in the biz refer to as "proof"... I know... what a simple concept

:cheers::cheers::cheers:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top