Your logical fallacy is based on points other Zoro Boys have tried to convey Acoa vs Daz Bones.... ive never discussed that topic nor give a shit about it...see the difference... Ill answer that... you definitely dont
Still with no explicit proof, the jury finds that Sanji did not bend the beak
so you don't believe zoro has Acoa...... ain't that a rare sight.. but regardless you out off all people od believe that don't you... plus ig i stated even post time skip zoro doesn't have Acoa.. but my question was just an example of how ludicrous you sound...since textual evidence is not present
you may ask me what the logical fallacy is..
Ig you have heard the apothem "actions speak louder than words"
you are presented with visual proof and you have denied it.. then you shift your arguments to Stylization which has been debunked and is dimwitted to call it a stylistic
change..it looks trash on king and contradicts the design of the actual dinosaur which is very poor for a stylistic change from some of the best mangaks on the planet.. but its a detail that has been consistently shown and Only after his collision with sanji... and the only time King does a beak attack and the witnesses like luffy are first hand are an evidence that the attack was fierce..
too much of a coincidence
lemme ask you a question Ben...
did zoro slash Kaido with enma during the rope a tatsumaki or all of his blades..