Jiihad never learns. Why do use Shanks? Why? 
Didn't I already tell you? When did E.Oda ever say Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more? When did he even show us that how Shanks even fights?
He never did that.
Only zoro/mihawk fans wants to think and dream that. You guys want to assume that Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more, because you can't overrate your favorite character without using Shanks, right?
Can you hype and overrate mihawk without using Shanks? You can't. But the irony of it that you can't even prove that Shanks is just a swordsman or fights only like a swordsman. Based on a single panel, then take Big mom's clash with Kaido, zoro fans would also say that Big mom is just a swordsman, because that was the only thing based on one panel that we've seen. This is how ridiculous your mihawk arguments are, you guys are trying to overrate mihawk based on only Shanks being a swordsman, when we've no idea how Shanks really fights, and even E.Oda says he doesn't know how Shanks fights in SBS.
D: What's the name of Red-Haired Shanks's sword? -P.N. Kooshi
E.Oda: Apparently it's called ''Griffon''. We've known Shanks ever since the very first chapter, but how does he actually fight?
But you mihawk fans seems to know better than E.Oda. And you guys seems to know everything about Shanks, every skill of Shanks, so you assume that Shanks is just a swordsman for %100 possibility in your mind, and overrate mihawk over this %100 confidence that Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more, do you even guys consider the fact that Shanks might not be a swordsman only? What will you guys do if Shanks isn't just a swordsman, how can you overrate mihawk without using Shanks? How desperate you guys will be?
Another irony; swordsman mihawk vs. Pre-Yonko Shanks, what happened? mihawk never beat Pre-Yonko Shanks in their duel. But mihawk accepted as no.1 swordsman by some people, while mihawk couldn't even beat a weaker and according to you mihawk fans; a Swordsman only Pre-Yonko Shanks. So how can mihawk be the no.1 swordsman in the world, without proving his swordsmanship superiority over Pre-Yonko and according to you ''swordsman only'' Shanks? He can't. Unless Shanks isn't just a swordsman, he is like Whitebeard, who uses a sword weapon and other abilities to fight, no one doubted that whitebeard > mihawk, when whitebeard was using a sword as well.
-Is that a Great sword?
E.Oda: ''Whitebeard's Naginata is called "Murakumogiri (Cloud Cutter)", it's a Supreme Grade Blade/Sword ''
-SBS Volume 93
It was whitebeard > mihawk, no one was going to claim mihawk becomes stronger than whitebeard because whitebeard uses a sword.
It's the same with Roger, mihawk won't be > Roger, based Roger holding a sword.
mihawk didn't even beat a weaker Pre-Yonko Shanks when they fight, there is no reason to believe mihawk is even close to Shanks's current Yonko level.
What language is this?
No, monkey d. luffy is lying as usual, I don't believe earth is flat.
Didn't I already tell you? When did E.Oda ever say Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more? When did he even show us that how Shanks even fights?
He never did that.
Only zoro/mihawk fans wants to think and dream that. You guys want to assume that Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more, because you can't overrate your favorite character without using Shanks, right?
Can you hype and overrate mihawk without using Shanks? You can't. But the irony of it that you can't even prove that Shanks is just a swordsman or fights only like a swordsman. Based on a single panel, then take Big mom's clash with Kaido, zoro fans would also say that Big mom is just a swordsman, because that was the only thing based on one panel that we've seen. This is how ridiculous your mihawk arguments are, you guys are trying to overrate mihawk based on only Shanks being a swordsman, when we've no idea how Shanks really fights, and even E.Oda says he doesn't know how Shanks fights in SBS.
D: What's the name of Red-Haired Shanks's sword? -P.N. Kooshi
E.Oda: Apparently it's called ''Griffon''. We've known Shanks ever since the very first chapter, but how does he actually fight?
But you mihawk fans seems to know better than E.Oda. And you guys seems to know everything about Shanks, every skill of Shanks, so you assume that Shanks is just a swordsman for %100 possibility in your mind, and overrate mihawk over this %100 confidence that Shanks is just a swordsman and nothing more, do you even guys consider the fact that Shanks might not be a swordsman only? What will you guys do if Shanks isn't just a swordsman, how can you overrate mihawk without using Shanks? How desperate you guys will be?
Another irony; swordsman mihawk vs. Pre-Yonko Shanks, what happened? mihawk never beat Pre-Yonko Shanks in their duel. But mihawk accepted as no.1 swordsman by some people, while mihawk couldn't even beat a weaker and according to you mihawk fans; a Swordsman only Pre-Yonko Shanks. So how can mihawk be the no.1 swordsman in the world, without proving his swordsmanship superiority over Pre-Yonko and according to you ''swordsman only'' Shanks? He can't. Unless Shanks isn't just a swordsman, he is like Whitebeard, who uses a sword weapon and other abilities to fight, no one doubted that whitebeard > mihawk, when whitebeard was using a sword as well.
-Is that a Great sword?
E.Oda: ''Whitebeard's Naginata is called "Murakumogiri (Cloud Cutter)", it's a Supreme Grade Blade/Sword ''
-SBS Volume 93
It was whitebeard > mihawk, no one was going to claim mihawk becomes stronger than whitebeard because whitebeard uses a sword.
It's the same with Roger, mihawk won't be > Roger, based Roger holding a sword.
mihawk didn't even beat a weaker Pre-Yonko Shanks when they fight, there is no reason to believe mihawk is even close to Shanks's current Yonko level.
What language is this?
No, monkey d. luffy is lying as usual, I don't believe earth is flat.
