General Feedback & suggestions
- Thread starter Noctis
- Start date
- Tags unban beta from this he speaks facts we need new mods
Just saying that if people dont like post caps in mafia games then simply dont sign up.
Many people around different communities vouch for post cap games because they are so much easier to play. Its more fair to everyone.
As for myself...I will have alot of future games with a maximum post cap, except the 30+ player SRMs will run normally. But expect me to introduce post caps in my normal RMs or Light Games in future, and if one doesnt like it, simply dont sign up.
Many people around different communities vouch for post cap games because they are so much easier to play. Its more fair to everyone.
As for myself...I will have alot of future games with a maximum post cap, except the 30+ player SRMs will run normally. But expect me to introduce post caps in my normal RMs or Light Games in future, and if one doesnt like it, simply dont sign up.
This isn't just about my preferences though 
It's literally about the forum rules which suggest that spam should be contrasted. Having people post 1000s in a single game spread across 10 days of period of time with specifically many of those posts constituting chains of one liners that could have been avoided if put in one single post (which is entirely the issue) isn't a behaviour that should be accepted in any serious forum board.
I'm fully aware that I'm personally not the best example of anti spam conduct, but that doesn't change the objective point I'm making here.
I'm not the one who makes the rules so it's not up to me to decide but suggesting is different.
Regardless my job was to make suggestions since this is what the thread is about, so I can dip.
It's literally about the forum rules which suggest that spam should be contrasted. Having people post 1000s in a single game spread across 10 days of period of time with specifically many of those posts constituting chains of one liners that could have been avoided if put in one single post (which is entirely the issue) isn't a behaviour that should be accepted in any serious forum board.
I'm fully aware that I'm personally not the best example of anti spam conduct, but that doesn't change the objective point I'm making here.
I'm not the one who makes the rules so it's not up to me to decide but suggesting is different.
Regardless my job was to make suggestions since this is what the thread is about, so I can dip.
I think u have a point with the 'likes', but i dont see them getting turned off here tbh.
I wouldn't be surprised if theres ppl who get swayed or manipulated by it if someone uses them to get ppl on their side. One could say its part of the game we play, manipulating someone is at the end of the day part of it, whether its a townie trying to lynch scum, or scum trying to make convincing arguments to mislynch someone outside of their team.
No one cares about post count and u have a clear agenda ur trying to spin here.
U prolly haven't considered that some ppl would use "but posts dont count here anyway" as an excuse to post even more spam if they're new to the section or smth.
I wouldn't be surprised if theres ppl who get swayed or manipulated by it if someone uses them to get ppl on their side. One could say its part of the game we play, manipulating someone is at the end of the day part of it, whether its a townie trying to lynch scum, or scum trying to make convincing arguments to mislynch someone outside of their team.
No one cares about post count and u have a clear agenda ur trying to spin here.
U prolly haven't considered that some ppl would use "but posts dont count here anyway" as an excuse to post even more spam if they're new to the section or smth.
This isn't just about my preferences though
It's literally about the forum rules which suggest that spam should be contrasted. Having people post 1000s in a single game spread across 10 days of period of time with specifically many of those posts constituting chains of one liners that could have been avoided if put in one single post (which is entirely the issue) isn't a behaviour that should be accepted in any serious forum board.
I'm fully aware that I'm personally not the best example of anti spam conduct, but that doesn't change the objective point I'm making here.
I'm not the one who makes the rules so it's not up to me to decide but suggesting is different.
Regardless my job was to make suggestions since this is what the thread is about, so I can dip.
It's literally about the forum rules which suggest that spam should be contrasted. Having people post 1000s in a single game spread across 10 days of period of time with specifically many of those posts constituting chains of one liners that could have been avoided if put in one single post (which is entirely the issue) isn't a behaviour that should be accepted in any serious forum board.
I'm fully aware that I'm personally not the best example of anti spam conduct, but that doesn't change the objective point I'm making here.
I'm not the one who makes the rules so it's not up to me to decide but suggesting is different.
Regardless my job was to make suggestions since this is what the thread is about, so I can dip.
The point would have been to remove them in order to reduce the spam so people would see it as a reinforcement instead of loosening up their behaviour and see it as a way to counter it to spam more but I also don't think that would have made for a major difference so I proposed post cap by attaching my thoughts to Ekko's original proposal.
But anyway it doesn't seem like any of my proposals had enough success so I will stop making suggestions that aren't properly appreciated.
But anyway it doesn't seem like any of my proposals had enough success so I will stop making suggestions that aren't properly appreciated.
I mean I'm ok with them being reinforced. I will adapt as well, no prob. I always strive for uniformity. If things were reinforced here they would be reinforced on the OP sections as well and I would cope with it but at least me Udell and a few other players who had no choice but step back would be able to return.
But something tells me nothing will be done to tackle the issue so I will just sit and stop presenting new proposals.
But something tells me nothing will be done to tackle the issue so I will just sit and stop presenting new proposals.
I meant as in changing the policy. I would have no problem to adapt as well in order not to arrive to such point. I don't even have much time to post on this site anymore, I have a busy life unlike those people who post 1000s in 10 days in this section.
As long as the issue was tackled here I would be ok with adapting across the other sections as well if the spam policy became more severe in general, even much more severe, on this forum.
As long as the issue was tackled here I would be ok with adapting across the other sections as well if the spam policy became more severe in general, even much more severe, on this forum.
