Is Bleach Better than Kingdom?


  • Total voters
    176
just an fyi if all this seems weird:
Here is the thing, and this goes for everyone on this sub.

Hara only follows one historical record as a source: the Shiji by Sima Qian.

And in the Shiji, the descriptions of the events on this year 233 B.C. are particularly limited, they do not mention anything about numbers or tactis employed by either the Zhao or Qin armies in this engagement.

It only mentions Huan Yi (Kanki) taking Yi'an, killing a Zhao General, then being repelled by Riboku (Li Mu) at Feixia, and Riboku (Li Mu) becoming the Lord of Wu'an after the battle.

If you are going by the wikipedia description on the Battle of Fei, I'm sorry to break all your hearts but none of that is in the Shiji, that's the reason why Hara isn't sticking to that.

Something similar happens with the whole Kanki/Hanoki thing fleeing to Yan, that's a theory from another historian, Sima Qian never wrote about that, Shiji doesn't mention Huan Yi (Kanki) ever again after the engagement in Feixia, so Hara has open room to fill the fate of Kanki; that being said, since Hara only follows the Shiji not other scholars, I highly doubt that he's gonna go with the theories of other people that are not Sima Qian.



this is from reddit a couple months ago.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Kingdom/comments/w2wdyk
 
just an fyi if all this seems weird:
Here is the thing, and this goes for everyone on this sub.

Hara only follows one historical record as a source: the Shiji by Sima Qian.

And in the Shiji, the descriptions of the events on this year 233 B.C. are particularly limited, they do not mention anything about numbers or tactis employed by either the Zhao or Qin armies in this engagement.

It only mentions Huan Yi (Kanki) taking Yi'an, killing a Zhao General, then being repelled by Riboku (Li Mu) at Feixia, and Riboku (Li Mu) becoming the Lord of Wu'an after the battle.

If you are going by the wikipedia description on the Battle of Fei, I'm sorry to break all your hearts but none of that is in the Shiji, that's the reason why Hara isn't sticking to that.

Something similar happens with the whole Kanki/Hanoki thing fleeing to Yan, that's a theory from another historian, Sima Qian never wrote about that, Shiji doesn't mention Huan Yi (Kanki) ever again after the engagement in Feixia, so Hara has open room to fill the fate of Kanki; that being said, since Hara only follows the Shiji not other scholars, I highly doubt that he's gonna go with the theories of other people that are not Sima Qian.



this is from reddit a couple months ago.

Interesting post, leaves up a lot of room for what exactly Kanki's fate follows, basically his own imagination from this point.
 
Hara is going to have Riboku beat Kanki while still making him look like a dumbass. Like why tf do you start chatting about anger and psychology with him and his army still there? At most take him prisoner and have the chat later
:suresure:
Because he wants to and he can?

Such is the privilege of the victorious.

Ri Boku decides whether he offers Kan Ki and his men a chance to live. He decides whether he slaughters them all to the last man. He decides when and where he wants to chat.

What's Kan Ki going to do to stop him, run away again? He did plenty of that this arc already. This is the end of the road.

It's so fucking bizarre how dumb people get just because they dislike Ri Boku. You're not even making any goddamn sense.
 
Top