There are arguements on this thread, I explained you the difference between popperian and non popperian science a long time ago, now go search for it, I won't waste my time trying to talk to a science denyer.
There are arguements on this thread, I explained you the difference between popperian and non popperian science a long time ago, now go search for it, I won't waste trying to talk to a science denyer.
I think they can be valid in certain discussions and can even have objective weight to them but being objective or factual does not mean they are sciences
carrot dont think so
but again he's a ideologue so who gives a shit about his biased opinion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.